Search Archive
Search Justinian
Justinian's news stories

The quality of mercy knows no limits ... Timbo Carmody rejects application to strike-off solicitor who fraudulently inflated timesheets ... Still "an ethical member" of the profession ... "Status seeking" solicitor's "safety switch" is back-on ... Plus, Melbourne solicitor has no prospect of rehabilitation ... Read more ... 


Free Newsletter sign-up
Justinian Columnists

Rent-a-quote ... Attorney General Porter supports two contradictory notions ... Free speech to attack judges personally, but the Law Council shouldn't criticise the Family Court CJ over the Three Wigs Willy affair ... News Corpse hacks do their stuff ... Department of Cant and Hypocrisy ... Read more ... 


This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "Apart from one treacherous act of base duplicity, I enjoyed all of my time at the bar. I was lucky to start at the bar as a pupil of Griffin QC who quickly taught me three things: (a) there's nothing better in life than fees; (b) why take on only one trial brief per day if you're offered three; (c) always tell solicitors about the great victories you had achieved and never tell them about your losses."  

    Federal Circuit Court swearing-in speech by Judge Gregory Egan. February 7, 2018 ... Read more flatulence ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    Michael Finnane QC joins us on the couch to talk about himself and his book The Pursuit of Justice ... In fact, he's concerned whether the courts actually deliver justice ... The sweep of history and experience from Menzies to Turnbull ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Clayton Utz in workplace defo drama ... Former Clayton Utz solicitor sues the firm for defamation … Email sent at the direction of former Law Soc prez Joe Catanzariti … Partners argue that proposed amended statement of claim "seriously prejudices them" ... Justice Simpson says firm’s submission is "inapt" ... Read more ... 


     

    « Oz v Overland | Main | Land of the rising bum »
    Tuesday
    Jun152010

    Clayton Utz in workplace defo drama

    Former Clayton Utz solicitor sues the firm for defamation … Email sent at the direction of former Law Soc prez Joe Catanzariti … Partners argue that proposed amended statement of claim “seriously prejudices them” ... Justice Simpson says firm’s submission is “inapt”

    Solicitor Bridgette Styles is suing all the partners of Clayton Utz in a defamation action arising from aggravation in the workplace group at the Sydney branch office of the big law shop.

    Styles, who worked at the firm for 16 months between August 2007 and December 2008, complains that Luis Izzo, a solicitor at Clayton Utz, defamed her in an oral communication to Joe Catanzariti, the firm’s employment law guru and former president of the NSW Law Society.

    According to a judgment of Carolyn Simpson in the NSW Supremes on June 7, dealing with a dispute about the pleadings, Izzo told Catanzariti on September 20, 2008:

    “Bridgette Styles, your new graduate solicitor, is making extremely serious and unjustified allegations about Abraham Ashe, Cilla Robinson and James Simpson and I [sic]. She is accusing us of conspiring to place pictures of me in Abe’s office. She is saying that she has been sexually harassed by the pictures and she is threatening to use the sexual harassment allegations as bargaining chips against the firm, to force us to let her stay in the Workplace Group after her rotation finishes. She was very aggressive and even grabbed me even though I was backing away. I don’t want to come back from secondment to the Workplace Group if she’s in it.”

    Styles has pleaded four defamatory imputations arising from that communication.

    She also alleged that the following day Izzo sent an email to an unknown number of people, one of whom was Sheila Rebeiro, the national HR manager of the corporate practice group.

    This email was a file note giving more details of Izzo’s exchange with Catanzariti.

    Catanzariti: directed email be sentIt is alleged that it was sent at the direction of Catanzariti, which makes the partnership as a whole liable for any defamatory consequences.

    The plaintiff’s pleadings claim the “sense and substance” of the email were republished to employees or agents of the firm, including to Rachael Weir the Sydney HR manager who then republished them to another person.

    The email also allegedly was discussed by an employee, Ms Jen Teh, “at a public bar in the vicinity of the offices of the partnership”.

    An office “alert” had been placed on Styles’ email address by the firm and so she republished Izzo’s file note in circumstances of a “social or moral” duty to truthfully answer queries about why she was not at work.

    Izzo’s email is the second matter complained of and Styles pleads that it gives rise to a further 16 defamatory imputations.

    Clutz went to court to get bits of the proposed amended statement of claim struck out, claiming that certain paragraphs seriously prejudiced the defendants.

    Since the amended statement of claim had not been filed Justice Simmo said that the application was “inapt”.

    The judge said Styles could have leave to file an amended statement of claim, but she’ll need to get it “reworked”.

    As Simpson put it:

    “The proposed pleading would be better if it made perfectly clear that reliance is placed upon republication as only going to damages.”

    By November 2011, Styles and Clutz had settled the claim

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Editor Permission Required
    You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.