Free Newsletter sign-up

 

Search Justinian
Justinian's news stories

Slaters sliced ... Pulling up the anchor at Slater & Gordon ... Where are the silken crime briefs? ... Bulletin from The Map ... Language of the law ... Human right to use the court's bathroom ... Theodora reports ... Read more ... 


Justinian Columnists

Hypocrite alert ... Young Christian sacked by employer because she was a NO voter ... SSM ... Andrew Bolt, never the sharpest tool in the shed, makes a mess of his free speech credentials ... Subeta Vimalarajah on inconsistent anti-discrimination laws ... Read more ... 


This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "[Victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests] volunteered that they felt at peace with themselves after being listened to by Peter O'Callaghan. As Commissioner, Peter achieved a unique thing – in [Václav] Havel's words he helped countless people 'orient their spirit' and gave them the certainty that their lives made sense Peter gave them hope just as it is described by Havel."

    Former High Court judge Susan Crennan at the unveiling of the portrait of Melbourne barrister Peter O'Callagan QC who ran Archbishop Pell's Melbourne Response to sexual abuse by priests. The Royal Commission reported that he failed to report criminal offences to the police. September 26, 2017 ... Read more ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    Anonymous campaign against Barry Dangerous ... Restlessness among the senior prefects of the NSW Law Soc ... New junior vice sworn-in ... Councillors stirring against senior vice with strange memo in circulation ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Whitelocke on Lawmanship ... Beguiling pastiche of barristerial posturing ... The importance of looking the part ... The Velvet Salamander transforms into the Silver Canetoad ... James Hutton reviews Bullstrode Whitelocke’s essential text for advocates ... From Justinian's archive, July 13, 2010 ... Read more ... 


     

    « An informal gathering | Main | Not so wonderful Copenhagen »
    Monday
    May082017

    Manus case goes upstream

    Judge agrees to streaming for Manus class action against the Commonwealth ... Open justice ... Members of the group are widely dispersed ... Benthamites delighted ... Peach Melba with her latest Yarraside report 

    THE Manus Island class action commences on Monday, May 15 and is scheduled to run for six months. There are 1,905 plaintiffs, all current or former detainees of the Manus "processing" centre, who are suing the Commonwealth, and security providers G4S and Broadspectrum (f.k.a. Transfield) and International Health and Medical Services. 

    They are claiming negligence and false imprisonment, on the grounds that the Commonwealth was aware or knew of the risk that detention of asylum seekers was contrary to Papua New Guinea law

    Justice Michael McDonald of the Victorian Supreme Court ruled on April 7 that the class action should be live-streamed so that the proceedings would be seen by as many of the parties as possible.

    HH said many of the group members lived outside Victoria and could not physically come to court. 

    Group members are currently located at the Manus processing centre, elsewhere in PNG, Nauru, in immigration detention in Australia, community detention, on bridging visas in the Australian community and back in their country of origin. 

    The decision is that the live-streaming will be open to the public at large. There are no orders to excise from the stream the evidence of any witness, although parties can make application during the trial to quarantine evidence from public viewing. 

    Initially the Commonwealth's position was outright opposition to any form of live streaming, although later it said it would be acceptible if it was available only to group members via a secure channel. 

    G4S Australia and International Health and Medical Services did not oppose the orders sought by the plaintiff. 

    Broadspectrum wanted live streaming to be available only to group members, the parties and their legal representatives. The company said the evidence of all its lay witnesses should be excluded from the live-stream or from its witnesses who continue to work at Manus or Nauru. 

    Broadspectrum executives deposed that there would be potential for hostile behaviour on the part of some detainees towards staff who gave evidence against the interests of group members. 

    HH was not persuaded: 

    "... it is highly likely that the trial will receive extensive media coverage, including media coverage accessible via the internet." 

    He said that the risk of hostility by detainees arising from witnesses would just as likely arise in response to media coverage of the trial. 

    "I am satisfied that it is appropriate in order to ensure that justice is done in the proceeding that the proceeding be live streamed to the public at large. Considerations of open justice favour this course." 

    Journalists will welcome the access, after years of having their attempts to report on offshore detention blocked by governments here in PNG and Nauru.  

    The Australian government's strategy has been to keep the conditions of offshore detention as far as possible from the mind of the electorate. This allows Minister Dutton to attempt to mislead the community about events such as the circumstances of the Good Friday incident when shots were fired into the Manus detention centre. 

    Usually the Commonwealth settles these sorts of actions so that unpleasant evidence does not emerge into the public domain. 

    The Australian Border Force Act 2015 makes it an offence for anyone working in a detention centre to disclose "protected information", i.e. anything they learn while doing their job. 

    Eva Orner's 2016 documentary Chasing Asylum is probably the closest Australians have come to seeing the conditions of Australia's offshore detention. It had to be filmed clandestinely and showed the Manus centre to be a tropical purgatory. 

    In emphasising the importance of public scrutiny and open justice, Justice McDonald is granting the asylum seekers what they have been denied for many years: the opportunity to speak publicly about the physical and mental harms they have suffered in detention. 

    Slater & Gordon, for the the plaintiff, believes this is the first time Australian court proceedings will be streamed internationally. 

    A UNHCR report noted that medical experts have found that offshore processing is devastating for physical and mental health. 

    It's heartening to see Jeremy Bentham coming back to life:

    "Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the keenest spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against impropriety. It keeps the judge himself whilst judging under trial." 

    Elif Sekercioglu reporting

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Member Account Required
    You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.