Search Justinian
Justinian's news stories

An afterlife for political flops ... The AAT has been trashed and stacked with the flotsam of the Liberal Party ... Cronyism ... Peter Dutton's "Australian values" ... The defenestration of the administrative review functions of the Commonwealth ... Read more ... 


Justinian Columnists

Hale Spiderwoman ... 11 out of 11 ... UK Supremes on a null and void prorogation ... Judicial review of the prerogative power of the crown ... Principle of parliamentary sovereignty ... Her Maj the cypher ... Welcome back Sir Edward Coke ... Procrustes explains ... Read more ... 


Justinian's Tweets


 

 

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "One of the reasons I'm enthusiastic about Boris Johnson's prime ministership is because if there was ever a cometh-the-hour, cometh-the-man moment in the recent history of this country, this is it and he is that person."    

    George Brandis, Australia's High Commissioner to the UK, speaking in Manchester at the Policy Exchange. October 2, 2019 ... Read more flatulence ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    Drugs, money and death ... The brutality of the drug business in Columbia ... Birds of Passage ... America, the greedy satan ... Complex codes of honour ... Peace and war ... Miss Lumière reviews the spectacle ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Is there something amusing, Mr Foreman? ... Defamatorium ... Outburst from barrister … Solicitor suing Financial Review ... Juror looked chastened after being directly addressed by counsel during summing-up … How to handle an outburst from the bar table... Let the transcript do the talking ... From Justinian's archive, March 2012 ... Read more ... 


     

     

    « Who is the real Inspector Clouseau? | Main | Weasels on the march »
    Friday
    Dec042015

    Salaciousness disguised as gravitas

    Book launch news ... Defamatorium ... Launch by Justinian's editor of David Rolph's steamy, yet scholarly, work on defamation law ... Cocktails and nourishment turned on by Gilbert + Tobin ... Historic occasion on which a book launch was not performed by Michael Kirby 

    Peter Leonard (Gilbert + Tobin), the editor-at-large, M. Kirby and Dr David Rolph, at the launch of "Defamation Law"

    I agreed to launch David Rolph's book Defamation Law, on condition that I didn't have to read it. 

    This is in keeping with the army of book reviewers who invariably don't read the books they are reviewing. 

    Why should this occasion be any different? After all, as is Michael Kirby's custom, the first thing I did was to check the index, only to be disappointed.

    So, I thought it would be a fitting moment to give my views about defamation and leave the book to one side. 

    After all, the cover doesn't exactly lure the reader to explore too deeply. Yet, after some furtive delving I discovered something. 

    David Rolph has produced a steamy, racy, bodice ripper of a book hiding inside a serious, scholarly, detailed, authoritative legal text. 

    It's as though English stockbrokers in the early 1920s on the Sevenoaks train to London were reading Lady Chatterley's Lover in a plain brown cover. 

    Here we have the full unexpurgated Ettinghausen v APC, Rivkin v Amalgamated TV, Advanced Hair Studios v TVW Enterprises, ABC v Hanson, Abbott v Random House

    Salaciousness disguised as gravitas. 

    It's the entire cast of characters that have made David Rolph what he is today. 

    What we also find is the brilliant way Dr Rolph has turned himself into a one man celebrity defamation echo vortex. 

    Various of his students at the law school have graduated into the refined campus of journalism where their first port of call in reporting court proceedings involving media defendants is to ring Dr Rolph for a comment. 

    Hence you see reported by Michaela Whitborne in The Sydney Morning Herald perspectives that you're unlikely to get elsewhere: 

    "Associate Professor Rolph said this is a complex case, and the outcome is unpredictable ..."

    In turn this has made David Rolph a household name. Tradies on building sites, fitters and turners, sheet metal workers are often heard to say over their quail-in-aspic sandwiches at lunchtime, "Did you see what Doc Rolph told the Telegraph on qualified privilege"? 

    As they say on Radio National, at least he has started to unpack a conversation about defamation and the fetters on the media. 

    One thing he has brought to the fore is the declining quality of defamation plaintiffs. Whereas previously the caper was confined to professional people, serious public figures and captains of industry, now the ranks of plaintiffs are clogged with jail birds, strip club operators, notoriously corrupt politicians, bikies and Muslim protesters. 

    The whole concept of reputation has changed. Now everyone has one, which makes life much harder for the free press and the freedom to get stuck into despicable people. 

    In the early days of my organ Justinian, I used to go down as see Hugh Keller at Dawson Waldron, until ultimately he said, "I can't advise you. I can't give you answers to whether it's safe to publish or not. Maybe. Maybe not." 

    If only, in those days we'd had David Rolph's scholarly book by our side to bring clarity to confusion. 

    If anything his book is a pointer to the shocking shortcomings of our defamation law, a law stuck in the age of the golf club notice board that  does not reflect the reality of what is happening with digital publishing.

    Our courts and legislators are well behind the curve in their response to information technology. 

    The courts even think that search engines can be treated as publishers of defamatory statements and this applies even where the operator of a search engine is not on notice. 

    More than anything the internet with its army of bloggers requires the response of a single publication rule, a serious harm test, someone to work out a contextual truth defence, a responsible journalism defence and an end to the unworkability of the High Court's efforts in Lange

    These are much more pressing issues for journalists, publishers and their legal advisors than amending the Racial Discriminate Act or other misplaced culture warrior ideas of improving free speech. 

    The 2005 reforms to defamation unified, nationally, a lot of old and quite poor law. It's unlikely that an attorney general, who's idea of free speech is to spy on citizens and send journalists to jail if they stumble upon something deemed to be a "special intelligence operation", will lead the charge. 

    But a campaign is needed to end defamation as a mugs game. David Weisbrot and the Press Council have signalled that they are interested in  giving the reform agenda a push and this may be the moment for the media to take it seriously. 

    I want to congratulate David on another important and splendid book, his fourth on media law. 

    And I'm more than happy to tip some of Gilbert + Tobin's sparkling refreshment over the cover and sent it down the slipway of retail triumph. 

    Defamation Law by Dr David Rolph, Thomson Reuters 

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Member Account Required
    You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.