Free Newsletter sign-up
PM's farewell

Search Justinian
Justinian's news stories

Innovations in fee collection ... Barrister lightly spanked for sending disturbing fee threat to former clients ... "See what happens if you don't pay your bills" ... File leverage ... Agreement not to complain in exchange for the file ... NCAT bares its gums ... Read more ... 


Justinian Columnists

Do nothing in the new utopia ... Policy vacuums ... Private sector leaders are filling voids created by sleepwalking politicians ... Voice to parliament and global warming left in the cold - which, somehow, gets us to the casualisation of the workforce, particularly at universities ... Fly-in, fly-out law school lecturers ... Full Federal Court wrestles with a "casual employee" ... Read more ... 


Justinian's Tweets


 

 

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "I am really and truly pleased that I have been vindicated and that the court has preserved the presumption of innocence."   

    Tom Domican, "colourful" Sydney identity, who provided security services to a Kings Cross drug dealer, after settling for $100,000 his defamation case against nightclub entrepreneur John Ibrahim and Pan Macmillan. September 13, 2019 ... Read more flatulence ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    David Hunt remembered ... Former NSW defamation judge and chief judge at common law ...The List with Socratic case management ... Defamation exotica ... Refinement of pleadings, perhaps over-refinement ... Prodigious worker ... International criminal law ... Tributes from Graham Hryce, David Rolph, Justice Mark Ierace and Judge Judith Gibson ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Sentencing terror ... Fabulous sentencing transcript from County Court, Victoria ... Judge James Montgomery and counsel wrestle with the dates and the years ... Pythonesque proceedings ... Court reporter struggles to keep up ... Tears to the eyes ... From the archive, June 2012 ... Read more ... 


     

     

    « Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs | Main | What's the point of law school? »
    Friday
    Jul272012

    The war against David Hicks may be over 

    Proceeds of Crime case against David Hicks folds ... Long period of vilification for Hicks may be over ... Admission of guilt in Guantanamo Bay "unreliable" ... Shadow of political meddling in criminal justice ... Soapy Brandis wide of the mark (again) 

    David Hicks - outside the NSW Supreme Court on Tuesday

    THE ultimate ignominy transpired this week when the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions withdrew his prosecution of Hicks under the Proceeds of Crime Act

    The proceedings sought to restrain further publication of the book Guantanamo: My Journey and an order for recovery of the proceeds of the book's sale. 

    The last person on the parapet shouting and pouring boiling oil on Hicks' head has been the Coalition's alternative attorney general Senator (Soapy) Brandis. He was given chest-beating space in the Murdoch press to advance his ill-conceived legal thesis that Hicks must be charged. 

    As one prominent lawyer said to me after the case was dropped:

    "Better to appoint a wombat as the next attorney general. At least it would do no harm and it would mean well." 

    Brandis could not have been across the common law or s.84 of the Evidence Act, both of which say that an admission of guilt cannot be put to a court if it was procured by "violent, oppressive, inhuman or degrading conduct". 

    The statement put out on Tuesday (July 24) by the DPP was an attempt at face saving. It claimed that Hicks' lawyers served new evidence, not previously available to the police or the prosecutors. 

    Maybe no one at the Commonwealth DPP has read Hicks' book, which detailed his mistreatment, the denial of assistance by the Australian government and the fact that he faced the prospect of staying in Guantanamo forever, even if he was successful before a Military Commission. 

    Any "new" evidence would have been an elaboration of what was already available. 

    The last sentence of the DPP's statement said:

    "I reached the view that this office was not in a position to discharge the onus placed upon it to satisfy the court that the admissions should be relied upon and decided that these proceedings should not continue."

    In other words, Hicks' admission of guilt is unreliable. 

    There is also another consideration. Not only was Hicks' admission forced by mistreatment, but the charge itself is a fabrication. Never has "material support for terrorism" (or MST) been a war crime, in the entire history of the world - until it was manufactured by the US Congress in the Military Commission Act of 2006. 

    This was after Hicks' had allegedly materially supported terrorism by "engaging in combat" against US forces in Afghanistan. 

    For the US to make opposition to Americans in a war zone a war crime and to apply it retrospectively is beyond the norms of anything previously considered in international law. 

    The issue of whether MST is a valid war crime is awaiting an outcome from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Hamdan case. The decision is imminent. 

    Maybe its very imminence is a factor that weighed on the prosecutor's mind back home. If all of a sudden the offence to which Hicks pleaded guilty was found to be invalid by a US court, his prosecution under the proceeds of crime legislation would be left looking pretty silly. 

    We've seen this late minute scuttling of prosecutions before. In 2005 a DC District Court judge, Joyce Hens Green, was on the verge of releasing her judgment in which she was to discuss Mamdouh Habib's torture. 

    Someone in the US government, perhaps Vice President Cheney's people, may have tipped off Howard & Co as there was a sudden change of tack. 

    Australia successfully sought Habib's repatriation just before the court decision was announced. 

    Drawn from Richard Ackland's SMH opinion column, July 27, 2012

    References (15)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: mydło sandałowe
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: refrain
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: tea weight loss
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: Lynchburg Realtors
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: beneficiosas
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: move house
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      Response: Arthur Falcone
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
    • Response
      The war against David Hicks may be over - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Member Account Required
    You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.