Search Justinian
Justinian's news stories

An afterlife for political flops ... The AAT has been trashed and stacked with the flotsam of the Liberal Party ... Cronyism ... Peter Dutton's "Australian values" ... The defenestration of the administrative review functions of the Commonwealth ... Read more ... 


Justinian Columnists

Hale Spiderwoman ... 11 out of 11 ... UK Supremes on a null and void prorogation ... Judicial review of the prerogative power of the crown ... Principle of parliamentary sovereignty ... Her Maj the cypher ... Welcome back Sir Edward Coke ... Procrustes explains ... Read more ... 


Justinian's Tweets


 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Transcript of the week ... A solicitor appears before a Yarraside judicial registrar ... Where's my stay? ... Waiver of court fees ... What's going on? ... It's so simple ... Give me a case ... Seeking to appeal against an order that is not a final order ... No arguable case ... The next case has been called ... Read more ... 

This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "One of the reasons I'm enthusiastic about Boris Johnson's prime ministership is because if there was ever a cometh-the-hour, cometh-the-man moment in the recent history of this country, this is it and he is that person."    

    George Brandis, Australia's High Commissioner to the UK, speaking in Manchester at the Policy Exchange. October 2, 2019 ... Read more flatulence ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    Drugs, money and death ... The brutality of the drug business in Columbia ... Birds of Passage ... America, the greedy satan ... Complex codes of honour ... Peace and war ... Miss Lumière reviews the spectacle ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Is there something amusing, Mr Foreman? ... Defamatorium ... Outburst from barrister … Solicitor suing Financial Review ... Juror looked chastened after being directly addressed by counsel during summing-up … How to handle an outburst from the bar table... Let the transcript do the talking ... From Justinian's archive, March 2012 ... Read more ... 


     

     

    « Richard Beasley SC | Main | The case against appointing Queens Counsel »
    Thursday
    Jan312019

    Radical social change

    Tax deductions, gender discrimination and the US Constitution get a workout in On the Basis of Sex ... Ruth and Marty Ginsburg's great case, together ... Tenth Circuit bowled over by RBG's five minute final submission ... Breaching the legislative dam against equality ... Miss Lumière at the preview  

    RBG: words matterLawyers as heroes - who would have thought? 

    Well, Ruth Bader Ginsburg did, as far back as 1959 when she was one of only nine female students in her class at Harvard, then America's most prestigious and crustily male law school.

    A new film, On the Basis of Sex, dramatises the luminous and brilliant early career of Ginsburg, one of the few remaining liberal voices on the current US Supreme Court, who at 85 is disinclined to step down while Trumpian insanity prevails in the White House.

    Unsurprisingly, the film is directed by a woman, Mimi Leder, and is really one long feminist battle cry, albeit a skilfully acted and directed one (the usual Yankee hokeyness aside).

    The screenplay, by Ruth Ginsburg's nephew Daniel Stiepleman, errs on the sentimental side, but to be fair, it's a sentimental tale of an extraordinary marriage based on (shock, horror), intellectual compatibility, mutual respect and love.

    Even today's audiences might be stunned to find that right from the beginning, in cookie-cutter fifties America, Marty and Ruth ("Kiki") Ginsburg enjoyed a true partnership of equals. 

    At home, he does most of the cooking (she's a danger in the kitchen) and shares childcare. He champions her intellectual smarts (she consistently tops her class) and together they prepare the case that will see the beginning of the end of gender discrimination laws in the US: Moritz v Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    Interestingly, it's a tax case brought to Ruth Ginsburg's attention by Marty, a brilliant tax attorney in his own right, while she's working as a law professor at Rutgers University. 

    Ruth ends up in academia, not by choice, but because no one (read male) will give her a job to practise law in New York, despite her academic credentials (she completed her law degree at Columbia University in typically stunning style).  

    There's a terrific scene in which a young, feisty Ginsburg is interviewed by a middle-aged male partner in a less than top rank New York firm.

    As she demonstrates her aptitude and passion for the practice of law, Atticus Finch style, he leers at her cleavage and finally tells her the firm is a "close knit" one and it couldn't possibly employ a woman because the partners' wives would "get jealous".

    Hell hath no fury. And that's just this reviewer's reaction. The film is peppered with similar scenes of male entitlement drenched in disdain and in 2019 it guarantees the appropriate response - equal parts outrage and derision.

    In fact, the main problem with On the Basis of Sex is that at times it sounds like one long feminist dissertation. More demonstration would have been better.

    But I forget, this IS a film about the law, and as young Ruth says, "words matter".

    There are plenty of them and the shape and content of the legal arguments, taken from court transcripts, are truly riveting, if that's your thing; it is your reviewer's.

    Ruth, played rather well by Felicity Jones, has a way with words, as well as legal concepts. It's pure joy to let the fire of them engulf every legal scene she's in.

    Her brilliance reaches its apotheosis in the US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, where in 1972 she takes on the tax code which denies her client, a single man Charles Moritz, a deduction for the nursing care of his frail mother. The code, like countless other laws, strived to protect traditional marriage, where the husband went out to work and the wife stayed home and did the cleaning and darning.

    Deductible care expenses could only be made by a woman, a widower, divorced person, or a husband whose wife is incapacitated or institutionalised. 

    Ginsburg takes the dismissive reference made by the government's lawyer about "radical social change" as a launching pad to demolish 100 years of legal discrimination based on gender.

    At five minutes 32 seconds, her rebuttal argument alone is worth the price of a ticket.  

    Marty, played by the impossibly handsome Armie Hammer (last seen being impossibly handsome and homosexually entwined in Luca Guadagnino's film equivalent of a Norsca ad, Call Me By Your Name) is almost too good to be true. 

    But he is true. In fact, all of it is. And that's a very good reason to see it.

    On the Basis of Sex opens in selected cinemas February 7. 

    Miss Lumière is Justinian's film reviewer 

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Editor Permission Required
    You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.