Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Keeping the bastards honest | Main | Out to lunch »
Friday
Jun252010

Avoiding the discovery train wreck

London calling … Disclosing electronic documents … Costs have travelled north in the wake of the Woolf reforms … Less willingness to order discovery … New gardening broom in Birmingham tries to keep the lid on the cost of disclosure … Leverhulme reports

Would there be uproar if a group of male lawyers announced that they were better at a particular legal skill than women?

Would there be howls of indignation if this troop of men were to create an organisation to parade its expertise?

Well, in a delightful setting in the sleepy old town of Birmingham, no-one batted an eyelid when a group called Women in eDiscovery gathered to share their experiences about a hot topic in litigation: the disclosure of electronic documents.

Hot as it is, it might not catch fire here for a few months.

Most lawyers shy away from it because they don’t know the difference between hardware and software.

The thought of advising a client about the necessity of harvesting residual data using text qualifiers or concept searches is like being forced to learn and speak Mandarin in a week.

A document is anything upon which information is recorded. It is reckoned that nearly 90 percent of documents are generated electronically.

IDC, the global market and intelligence firm estimates that 22.2 billion emails are sent each day.

Good lawyers know the value of an email as evidence. It is generally contemporaneous (how many people feel compelled to respond to an email immediately?); it is a good indication of the sender’s state of mind (how many of us have regretted pressing the send button, specially when we were angry?); and an email unlike a handwritten letter is not private.

The old saw must now be taken literally. “A lie can be half-way around the world before the truth has got its boots on.”

Lord Justice Jacob: costs have increasedCompanies routinely destroy emails. But such evidence is hard to obliterate. The cost of searching for electronic documents can be crippling.

As Senior Master Whitaker said in Goodale, the parties usually know what paper they have but have no idea about their electronically stored information; its quantity; where it is stored and whether it is searchable.

Lord Justice Jacob, the patent specialist who writes very entertaining judgments, said in Nichia that despite the aim of the Woolf reforms being to bring down costs, practitioners have carried on much as before. Costs have increased.

Sir Robin said the time had come where proportionality required that disclosure should not normally be ordered.

In the same case, Lord Justice Pill said that a judge, with the help of the parties, should make an order tailored to achieving a just outcome, including as far as possible limiting the costs.

Incidentally, a few years ago Jakes and the Pillster had a celebrated disagreement in the Technip case after Jakes called inventors “nerds.”

* * *

Simon Brown: limit documentsA new broom is often not a popular recruit to the broom cupboard and so it is proving in Birmingham.

His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC of the Birmingham Mercantile Court takes his responsibilities seriously and is doing what the Court of Appeal directs.

He says it is gross incompetence if practitioners do not to know and practise the rules.

This judge is actively managing his cases as early as possible and keeping a cap on the costs. He is asking the parties to co-operate about disclosure, and to tell the court what searches they propose and how much they are going to cost. It is frequently done in the presence of the clients.

The judge often tells the parties to limit their documents to one file of 250 pages and warns litigants to refrain from printing them until it is absolutely necessary.

As a judge, the affable Simon Brown came to prominence in Earles, when the court penalised the successful respondent (a bank) 25 percent in costs for failing to disclose documents.

Had they been revealed two years before, the case would have ended with a quick loss to the claimant.

The decision caused a lot of muttering among commercial law firms.

However, Lord Justice Jackson has weighed in with a recommendation that lawyers should undergo training in e-disclosure, and the new broom’s approach is gaining a lot of support.

Judge Brown is sweet on IT, but not even Jacob LJ would call him a nerd.

He has a hinterland. He is the Master Gardener of the Inner Temple (seen here) and he and his wife Kathy hold open days for the public at their home and garden in Bedfordshire.

* * *

Which brings us to the Electronic Women, who hail from America where discovery or disclosure is grossly expensive and who came to England to warn the locals to avoid what they call “the train wreck in the United States”.

During the seminar, a few good men crept into the room, but they were made very welcome.

Judge Stinson: litigant finedThe message was clear. Women are better at tasks like disclosure (presumably because they are more tidy and thorough) and this is an area where young female litigators can really shine.

Maybe they are right. But women have other qualities too. Judge Jane Magnus Stinson (pic), of the Federal Court in Indiana and a judge to watch, makes Judge Simon Brown look like Pollyanna.

In a recent decision, Novelty v Mountain View Marketing, (04/21/10), Her Honour fined a party which had been coy about discovery $50,000 for wasting the court’s time.

That wasn’t all. Two counsel (both chaps) were sent on a professional conduct course entitled “Applied Professionalism Program for Newly Admitted Attorneys”.

How would that go down in Australia?

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.