Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

South Australian lawyer practising without a ticket ... Latest developments in Law Society of SA v Betro ... As an alternative to invalidating all the family law trials involving the unlicenced barrister, the Full Court has been approached re possibility of granting a retrospective practising certificate ... The mother in relevant proceedings applied to be joined to argue against this ... Joinder granted on a limited basis to make written submissions. See also Unread emails 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Oz v Overland | Main | Land of the rising bum »
Tuesday
Jun152010

Clayton Utz in workplace defo drama

Former Clayton Utz solicitor sues the firm for defamation … Email sent at the direction of former Law Soc prez Joe Catanzariti … Partners argue that proposed amended statement of claim “seriously prejudices them” ... Justice Simpson says firm’s submission is “inapt”

Solicitor Bridgette Styles is suing all the partners of Clayton Utz in a defamation action arising from aggravation in the workplace group at the Sydney branch office of the big law shop.

Styles, who worked at the firm for 16 months between August 2007 and December 2008, complains that Luis Izzo, a solicitor at Clayton Utz, defamed her in an oral communication to Joe Catanzariti, the firm’s employment law guru and former president of the NSW Law Society.

According to a judgment of Carolyn Simpson in the NSW Supremes on June 7, dealing with a dispute about the pleadings, Izzo told Catanzariti on September 20, 2008:

“Bridgette Styles, your new graduate solicitor, is making extremely serious and unjustified allegations about Abraham Ashe, Cilla Robinson and James Simpson and I [sic]. She is accusing us of conspiring to place pictures of me in Abe’s office. She is saying that she has been sexually harassed by the pictures and she is threatening to use the sexual harassment allegations as bargaining chips against the firm, to force us to let her stay in the Workplace Group after her rotation finishes. She was very aggressive and even grabbed me even though I was backing away. I don’t want to come back from secondment to the Workplace Group if she’s in it.”

Styles has pleaded four defamatory imputations arising from that communication.

She also alleged that the following day Izzo sent an email to an unknown number of people, one of whom was Sheila Rebeiro, the national HR manager of the corporate practice group.

This email was a file note giving more details of Izzo’s exchange with Catanzariti.

Catanzariti: directed email be sentIt is alleged that it was sent at the direction of Catanzariti, which makes the partnership as a whole liable for any defamatory consequences.

The plaintiff’s pleadings claim the “sense and substance” of the email were republished to employees or agents of the firm, including to Rachael Weir the Sydney HR manager who then republished them to another person.

The email also allegedly was discussed by an employee, Ms Jen Teh, “at a public bar in the vicinity of the offices of the partnership”.

An office “alert” had been placed on Styles’ email address by the firm and so she republished Izzo’s file note in circumstances of a “social or moral” duty to truthfully answer queries about why she was not at work.

Izzo’s email is the second matter complained of and Styles pleads that it gives rise to a further 16 defamatory imputations.

Clutz went to court to get bits of the proposed amended statement of claim struck out, claiming that certain paragraphs seriously prejudiced the defendants.

Since the amended statement of claim had not been filed Justice Simmo said that the application was “inapt”.

The judge said Styles could have leave to file an amended statement of claim, but she’ll need to get it “reworked”.

As Simpson put it:

“The proposed pleading would be better if it made perfectly clear that reliance is placed upon republication as only going to damages.”

By November 2011, Styles and Clutz had settled the claim

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.