Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

South Australian lawyer practising without a ticket ... Latest developments in Law Society of SA v Betro ... As an alternative to invalidating all the family law trials involving the unlicenced barrister, the Full Court has been approached re possibility of granting a retrospective practising certificate ... The mother in relevant proceedings applied to be joined to argue against this ... Joinder granted on a limited basis to make written submissions. See also Unread emails 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Visigoths invade the temple | Main | Silent investor »
Friday
Nov072014

Cunneen v ICAC - hold tight

Judge says he'll deliver judgment on Monday ... Declarations sought by crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen that ICAC is acting beyond power ... Corruption commission agrees to delay public hearing into allegations till Tuesday 

Hoeben: refining his thoughts over the weekend ICAC has undertaken not to proceed with its public hearing into allegations against NSW prosecutor Margaret Cunneen until next Tuesday morning (Nov. 11). 

The matter was back in court at 2pm today (Friday, Nov. 7) where Justice Cliff Hoeben said he would not be able to deliver his judgment before Monday (Nov. 10) at 2pm. 

Cunneen, her son and her son's girlfriend are seeking declarations that ICAC is exceeding its jurisdiction and that its decision to hold a public inquiry is invalid and a nullity. 

After some argy-bargy involving Cunneen's counsel Arthur Moses, and Jeremy Kirk for ICAC, the corruption commission said that it would hold-over its proposed public hearing till Tuesday (Nov. 11). 

It was scheduled to start on Monday morning. 

If Cunneen's application is unsuccessful there will be an appeal and a further delay. 

ICAC wants to investigate whether Cunneen, her son Stephen Wyllie, and his girlfriend Sophia Tilley, intended to pervert the course of justice by advising Ms Tilley to fake chest pains at the scene of a car accident to avoid a police breath test.  

On Monday, Justinian questioned whether aspects of the allegations actually stacked-up. 

See: Mother love   

The summons for judicial review has three main components ... 

ICAC is acting beyond its jurisdiction 

The plaintiffs say that Cunneen's public position as a senior counsel and a deputy senior public prosecutor is "extraneous" to the allegations. 

"The allegations made against the plaintiffs are that each of them, acting in a private capacity, engaged in conduct, which constituted an attempt to pervert the course of justice by, in effect, deflecting the police from testing the blood alcohol level of the third plaintiff at the scene of a motor vehicle accident." 

The summons says that it is the role of the police, not ICAC, to investigate allegations of this character. 

"It would offend the principle of legality to construe the provisions of the ICAC Act, and in particular section 8(2) of the Act as if they empowered the defendant to usurp or duplicate the investigatory functions conferred by the state on the NSW police in relation to allegations which rise no higher than that persons attempted to pervert the course of justice, simply because one of the persons holds public office." 

The alleged conduct, it is submitted, is not enough to amount to "corrupt conduct" within the meaning of s.8(2), which "requires more than proof of an allegation that such a statement was made". 

Further, s.13(1)(a) of the Act requires ICAC to form an "opinion" about the alleged corrupt conduct to be investigated.  

The material put forward by the plaintiffs says that to form this opinion was "irrational and illogical [such as] to deprive any such putative opinion of the legal character of an opinion" for the purposes of the section. 

ICAC took into account an irrelevant consideration

The irrelevant consideration was that Cunneen was a deputy senior crown prosecutor and an SC. 

"The subject matter, scope and purpose of the Act do not provide that a public official and persons related to the public official are to be deprived of their fundamental rights as a citizen including the right to silence, simply because the first plaintiff is a public official in circumstances where the alleged conduct does not relate to the exercise of her functions as a public official." 

The decision to hold a public inquiry

Here the argument is that ICAC failed to take account of considerations required by s.31(2(c) and (d) of the ICAC Act, namely:  

(2) Without limiting the factors that it may take into account in determining whether or not it is in the public interest to conduct a public inquiry, the commission is to consider the following ... 

(c) any risk of undue prejudice to a person's reputation (including prejudice that might arise from not holding an inquiry),

(d) whether the public interest in exposing the matter is outweighed by the public interest in preserving the privacy of the persons concerned.

Justice Hoeben is taking longer than expected to think about all the issues. Hold tight till Monday. 

See: ICAC Act

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.