Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


NSWDCJ Robert Newlinds, again ... Judgment has now been amended to remove the words "he was a good-looking young man" in [1] and to remove "She was (and remains) an attractive young lady" from [2]". Well done Robert ... Fazldeen v State of New South Wales >>

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Wymyn baristas | Main | Supreme Court of Riverview »
Friday
Feb222013

Fair trials for lawyers

Staying criminal trials in the hope that legal aid will stump-up more money ... Solicitorless in a fused world ... Too much work for barristers ... More lawyers needed for cases that are not complex 

Lasry J: stay a while

IN the past week, two criminal trials have been brought to a halt in Victoria because counsel were going to be without instructing solicitors for the duration of the trials. 

New Vic legal Aid regulations, aimed at reducing a $3.1 million deficit, dictate that an instructing solicitor will only be provided for two and half days of the trial. 

See The rich tapestry of the law 

Last Friday, Justice Lasry's court heard that Andrew Jackson, counsel for the accused in an attempted murder case, was forced to head on down to the local magistrates court to locate his instructing solicitor. 

Despite admitting that "in the context of trials in this Court, [the case] could not be regarded as complex", Lasry was hesitant to allow Jackson to continue to fly solo. 

Although Lasry concluded he could not provide a remedy to the situation under s.197 of the Criminal Procedure Act, he ordered a temporary stay under the guise of an accused's right to a fair trial. 

HH said proceedings would not resume until counsel has a solicitor for the entire trial. 

His reasons provided an exhaustive list of tasks that differentiate a solicitor from a barrister both prior to and during the trial, including: 

  • The briefing of counsel, by then armed with a thorough knowledge of the case and an understanding as how a trial could or should be conducted; 
  • Being present at discussion concerning whether the client should plead guilty or not guilty; 
  • Consulting with counsel on how to most effectively cross-examine prosecution witnesses; 
  • Being present at all conferences with client and counsel. 

Lasry was also concerned about an increased workload should a barrister have to complete "administrative tasks". 

The following Monday saw Justice Terry Forrest in lock-step with Lasry, also awarding a temporary stay until an instructing solicitor could be guaranteed for the entire trial in a murder case. 

He thanked Lasry for compiling the list of solicitors' duties.

The rumour-mill at the Vic Supremes has it that the Chief Justice has been calling her peers in other jurisdictions to see if the justice system still works with only one defence lawyer. 

However, all this careful listing of the separate tasks of lowly solicitors seems a bit unnecessary - particularly in a jurisdiction that is technically fused, and where solicitors and barristers are supposedly interchangeable. 

According to practitioners on the ground in other fused states is not unusual for serious criminals cases to be conducted with only one lawyer each side. 

Ultimately, the courts have to get on with it. The accused cannot continue to languish while judges and the government squabble over legal aid funding. 

The problems with legal aid have been going on since Lex and Terry were in shorts.

In Lasry's own words:

"There have been debates about legal aid funding for many years. This is the latest of them." 

The profession is cheering the judiciary's brave stand to get more lawyers into court, even for cases that "could not be regarded as complex". 

It's unlikey that s.197 will save the day, because it is not as though these accused do not have legal representation. The court is saying they need more legal representation. 

There's an interesting chart here, showing how the Vic and NSW governments have been milking their respective public purpose funds to prop-up legal aid, while state (and Commonwealth) funding declines comparatively. 

Reporter: Alix Piatek

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.