Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Tasmanis's Lieutenant Guv (and CJ) Christopher Shenanigans is unlikely to decide the consitiutional impass ... The current guv'nor, former Circuit Court judge and family lawyer Barbara Baker returns to Guv House next week ... Labor hates the Greens and is unlikely to form a coalition government ... Another election looks likely as the numbers for both sides are brittle and unreliable ... However, Baker can ask the Labor leader to test his numbers. 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« High class racketeering | Main | Queue See »
Saturday
May182013

Fish shop phone furore

Barrister and solicitor were parties to secret recording of mobile phone conversation while a trial was in progress ... Impropriety ... Application to tender recording rejected ... Breach of Surveillance Devices Act and Evidence Act ... Alix Piatek reports 

Fish shop case and improperly recorded phone conversation

NSW Dizzo Court Judge Philip Taylor had some strong things to say about the roles of a solicitor and a barrister in what purports to be the illegal recording of a mobile phone conversation.  

"The gravity of the impropriety of the secret recording is increased by the circumstances of this case in that it involved counsel and solicitor and it involved an impropriety in relation to the administration of justice as it concerned proceedings then being heard." 

Sydney barrister Robert Newell and solicitor Leonardo Murintini acted for Serge Wachtenheim and his company, who were sued by De Costi Seafoods and the De Costi franchise operation for monies owed by a Dee Why fish shop. 

The trial ran for 75 days and De Costi was successful in the main claim and defeated a cross-claim alleging damages for misleading conduct. 

The defendants/cross-claimants sought to tender a recording of a mobile phone conversation between a witness, David Shnider, and barrister Newell (second floor Wentworth). 

Shnider was giving evidence in-chief at the time the application was made. 

The phone conversation took place in a District Court conference room in John Maddison Tower six weeks into the trial. 

There were a number of people present, including Wachtenheim, James Turner (a witness), solicitor Murintini and Murtini's wife, Faith. 

Wachtenheim made the call to Shnider and after they had spoken briefly he handed the phone to Newell. 

According to Turner's affidavit Wachtenstein said: 

"David I am here with my barrister and solicitor and with some other people. Robert wants to speak to you. David, do you mind if I put you on loudspeaker so we can all hear you, is that alright with you?" 

An unidentified person in the room said: 

"It might be good if we made notes of what David is saying." 

Turner recorded the conversation on his Samsung S2. When the recording was finished Wachtenstein downloaded the conversation from the mobile phone to his digital recorder. 

Judge said witness not told he was on speakerphone

Judge Taylor rejected the application to tender the recording. He accepted Shnider's evidence that he "lacked trust in Mr Newell and Mr Muriniti". 

Neither Newell nor Muriniti gave evidence, which the judge described as "significant". 

Shnider said that he did not know that he was on speakerphone. 

The judge said: 

"In all these circumstances, I am not persuaded that the recording happened on a whim of Mr Turner. The circumstances (and the unexplained absence of any evidence from Mr Newell, Mr Muriniti or Mr Wachtenheim) persuade me that the matter was planned before the call was made, and that Mr Newell, Mr Muriniti and Mr Wachtenheim were all aware of the plan. I prefer Mr Shnider's evidence, and accept that he was not told about, and did not consent to, either the mobile phone being on loudspeaker or that 'other people' were able to hear the conversation." 

Stephen Stanton, for De Costi, pointed out that Turner was still under cross-examination and should not have been present discussing evidence with the cross-claimants. 

Wachtenheim had not yet given evidence and he too should not have been having discussions with a witness. 

Taylor DCJ agreed: 

"The impropriety of counsel and solicitor in having Mr Turner and Mr Wachtenheim present at the time of the conversation with Mr Shnider on loudspeaker is a basis for exclusion." 

He found that the conversation constituted a breach of s.7 of the Surveillance Devices Act NSW for recording a private conversation; and that both Newell and Muriniti acted improperly in allowing Turner and Wachtenheim to hear the conversation and record it without Shniders' consent, both a breach of s.138(1) of the Evidence Act NSW

However, he didn't think that any remedy would be likely in respect of the "inappropriate conduct". 

The application to tender the conversation was rejected during the trial last year, but the reasons have just been published (May 3). 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.