Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Forty nine years ago ... | Main | Haines blasts Temby »
Saturday
Jan012000

Forbidden sex

It was a very different world in 1989 ... In Scotland gay judges were being hounded off the bench ... Victualler at Valentine's Bar heard loose tongue flapping ... Hooker tapes Honkers prosecutor asking for underage sex ... From Justinian December 1989

Allegations about rampant homosexuality on the Scottish bench have thrown the normally tranquil, porridge-loving Scots bar into disarray.

Lord Dervaird (married wit three children) has stepped down from the bench to avoid being the subject of an inquiry, while Lord Hope, the Lord President, made a very important ruling, at a press conference in his home, no less.

He declared that "homosexuality would, of itself, be no bar to being a judge".

This ruling, believed to be the first of its kind in the common law world, will doubtless come as an immense relief to quite a number of judges in jurisdictions far from Scotland.

Apart from Lord Dervaird, the accusations concern four other judges, disconcertingly described by Lord Hope as A, B, C and D.

Judge A is supposed to have visited a "gay" bar with a junior member of the bar with whom he is reputedly "having a relationship".

An allegation that he indulged in criminal conduct with "rent boys" at Lord Dervaird's cottage at Stranaer Bay was investigated by local police at the Crown Office and found to be "without foundation".

Judge B is said to have visited a disco frequented by homosexuals in Glasgow, but "left in disgust". The Lord President was satisfied that the allegations against him were "without foundation".

Nothing is known about judge C, while judge D once shared a flat 25 years ago before he was married with either of Lord Dervaird, or judges A, B or C.

Another judge, Lord Weir (58, married, three children) admitted he had been questioned by Lord Hope about the rumours, but denied any allegation against him, and threatened to sue anyone who repeated them.

Lord Dervaird's resignation is perplexing. Homosexual practices between consenting adult males have been legal in Scotland since 1980. If he was within the law, why should he resign?

 

From the Daily Record, December 23, 1989

Alternatively, if he had done something not only scandalous, but illegal, why should he be exempt from disciplinary action? Was a deal done to protect good name of the judiciary?

Lord Denning was quoted in The Sunday Times as making the helpful remark:

"Supposing an accused man gets to hear of a judge's homosexual relationship and sends him a note saying, 'I will expose your relationship if you send me to prison'."

According to the New Statesman, homosexual members of the English bar say they are only too well aware of the immense hostility held by the civil servants of the Lord Chancellor's department towards them.

It would be almost unheard of for a barrister, whose homosexuality was widely known, to make it onto the bench.

I'm also indebted to The Independent for this explanation:

"Experience shows that for a small minority of those in public life, the pleasures of sex gain an added frisson from being enjoyed in risky or even downright dangerous circumstances."

Noel Nesbitt, the victualler at Valentine's Bar, a well known lawyers' watering hole in Edinburgh summed-up the situation:

"The lawyers' tongues are loosened when they come in here. If they have had a good day, winning a case, then it's bottles of the best champagne at ₤30 a go. That's when the stories start flying around the place. It's usually a flash flood. They have all gone in an hour or two. Presumably home to their wives."

*   *   *

It may have been the frisson that was the factor that has led to problems for the Deputy Senior Crown Prosecutor in Hong Kong, Christopher Harris.

Mr Harris is being prosecuted for incitement to procure underage girls for sexual purposes.

The ages of 13 and 14 seemed to be particularly exciting for Harris.

Unfortunately, a prostitute with whom Harris liked "talking dirty" wired herself to tape record the crown prosecutor's requests to procure a particularly delectable young Caucasian girl.

The DPP and the Attorney General decided to try to cover it all up and to allow Harris to resign from the Crown Prosecutors' Department.

Harris even attended a jolly farewell drinks party in the mess with all his chums.

Not long after, the taped conversations with the prostitute were leaked to Mr Murdoch's South China Morning Post.

The Post gave the story major splash treatment and after a delay of four months the Attorney General, Mr J Mathews, was forced to backtrack and have Harris charged.

Police had gathered further evidence following a raid on the prostitute's flat.

Harris was talking respectable amounts of money for these "sessions" with the young girls. About $A1,000 a pop.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.