Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Potty Mouth Solicitor Dispatched ... NSW Court of Appeal takes dim view of solicitor who laced his correspondence with disrespectful insults ... Insufficiently professional ... Arrived from Greece with only his underpants ... No contrition ... Anthony Kanaan files ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Suing for defamation - it's such a good idea ...Federal Court of Australia ... Sydney barrister loses bid for extension of time to bring appeal over decision allowing Giles George to intervene to seek an equitable lien over costs ... Falling out between barrister and firm after successful defamation action ... No error or procedural unfairness ... From Stephen Murray at the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Major victory for the media as public interest defence established in large and lengthy defamation case brought by orthopaedic surgeon ... Al Muderis v Nine Network, Fairfax and The Age ... Good journalism wins the day ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I've stopped six wars in the last - I'm averaging about a war a month. But the last three were very close together. India and Pakistan, and a lot of them. Congo was just and Rwanda was just done, but you probably know I won't go into it very much, because I don't know the final numbers yet. I don't know. Numerous people were killed, and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years, intermittently, and we solved that war. You probably saw it just came out over the wire, so we solved it ..."

President Donald Trump at a meeting in Scotland with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer ... July 28, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Home Duties ... The dumping of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus ... Behind the scenes ... Bastardry among the brothers ... Unfinished business ... Family law, privacy ... Considerable policy and legislative results ... Here's Michelle Rowland as AG ... What are her priors? ... Polly Peck reports from the Gallery ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Abolish silks ... Sydney SC writes to the editor calling for abolition of the silk system ... Appointments are anachronistic ... It's not a matter of ability, only notability ... Secret blackballing ... "Corrupt" process ... Confessions from an insider who played the game ... From Justinian's Archive, October 24, 2002 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Get your Roxon | Main | Help - I'm in the same club as Eugene McGee »
Friday
Mar092012

Have your questions developed a steady rhythm?

Transcript of proceedings foreshadows life under the new Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates ... Barristers required to meet competency standards ... Assessment panels and judicial evaluation ... The future has arrived ... Leverhulme's London Calling   




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 
CRIMINAL DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice 
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 17th November 2012 

 

Before:

Pimlico, Buttermouth and Ludlow-Scott LJJ

Al Zarooni-Appellant

V

R - Respondent

17th November 2012 (Weekend and Night-time sitting)

Transcript of Proceedings

 

Pimlico L.J: Who appears for the Appellant in the first matter?

Voice from the back of the court: I do.

Pimlico L.J: Who are you?

Interpreter: I am Mr Al Zarooni's interpreter. He says you can call him Al.

Pimlico L.J: Come forward please. Swear him in. Where is his lawyer? Sorry, under the Human Rights Act he is not obliged to have a lawyer nor is the court entitled to draw any inferences in respect of his apparent  failure to have a...

Interpreter: He says Mr Showfolk can't speak today.

Pimlico L.J: Why? This case has been listed for weeks. Who appears for the prosecution? Mr Percy-Biggins?

Mr Percy-Biggins: Well, not in so many words, my Lord. I'm here to assist.

Pimlico L.J: What does that mean? Why can't you argue the case?

Mr Percy-Biggins: My Lord, I'm not competent to appear at this level.

Pimlico L.J: You've been appearing before us for years Mr Percy-Biggins.

Mr Percy-Biggins: I know my Lord. But I've been too busy to do the advocacy training. I haven't been assessed. I need to brush up on my diversity awareness. Ms Douglas-Grave was counsel at the trial and was due to appear this morning but she didn't succeed in obtaining her compulsory renewal.

Pimlico L.J: Her what?

Mr Percy-Biggins: Her compulsory renewal under the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates - it's a product of the Joint Advocacy Group. She was required to be assessed as competent in a range of simulated court room and practical assessments as devised by the Professional Development Division of the College of Knowledge which is now wholly owned by Rockchomp Inc. a group of Russian venture capitalists.

Pimlico L.J: I don't follow you, Mr Percy-Biggins.

Mr Percy-Biggins: Technically, Ms Douglas-Grave's appearance today would have fallen outside the five year period for accreditation because she wishes to remain at Level 3 and does not want to progress to Level 4. She found out this morning that the assessment organisation had failed her on three grounds.

One, her questioning technique was not intuitive and did not appear to be effortless pursuant to competency standard 124.

Two, she did not readily offer sound authorities and/or solutions including novel solutions in unusual situations pursuant to competency standard 12; and

Three, and I am instructed that this was her worst shortcoming according to the assessment panel, she did not view the case holistically from the outset, which is a breach of competency standard 26.

Pimlico L.J:  How does one go about writing a simulated assessment for those things, Mr Percy-Biggins? How can one write a case study that tests whether a person's questioning technique is intuitive or whether they are viewing a case holistically? If a carpenter makes a defective table, he is liable. He shouldn't have to pass exams to progress to a sideboard. The proof of the pudding ... 

Anyway, I can see Ms Douglas-Grave sitting in the back of the court.

Mr Percy- Biggins: Well, my Lord, technically you cannot. She has disrobed. Put another way, and for the sake of completeness, she is unable to appear in these Level 4 proceedings even provisionally. But she will be appealing and is taking a jurisdictional point.

Pimlico L.J: Which is?

Mr Percy-Biggins: She says that assessment panels must comprise suitable qualified individuals with knowledge and experience of, inter alia "assessment of competence in a real work environment". She says a member of her panel did not meet that criterion.

Pimlico L.J: Why not?

Mr Percy-Biggins: Apparently, he was a journalist.

Pimlico LJ:  Interpreter. Please ask Mr Al Zarooni where his lawyer is?

Interpreter: He says Mr Showfolk is sitting in the back with the prosecutor. He is unable to speak because he didn't pass the judicial evaluation. It is different from a test set by an assessment organisation. He was required to obtain a maximum of five pieces of judicial evaluation over a 12 month period; three of which were to confirm that he was competent at his current level and ready to progress to the next level.

The judge at the trial, who Mr Al Zarooni says used to be a mechanic and did her degree part-time at the Open University, said she didn't understand the form. She finally filled it out last night. Mr Showfolk failed in a couple of competencies.

Pimlico L.J: Which were?

Interpreter:  He didn't tailor his submission to meet the expectations of the tribunal. That is competency 59. The judge wanted him to plead guilty. In fact, they got into an argument about it.

She also accused Mr Showfolk in open court of not being a good role model for other defence lawyers. Luckily she didn't know that was in the Statement of Standards at the time. Nor was she aware that he was required under competency 140 to be agile and responsive to the sentiment of the judge.

Pimlico L.J: How does Mr Al Zarooni know all this?

Interpreter: He says he was a lawyer in Yemen for five years. And in case you're wondering, he says he is entitled to live here because no-one checked his passport. He runs a legal services practice in Croydon. He kicks people out of their homes.

Pimlico L.J: I see. Go on.

Interpreter: The second problem with Mr Showfolk, he says, was the judge didn't think he was a self-assured and unflappable advocate (competency 73). But her strongest complaint was under competency 114.

Pimlico L.J: What is that?

Interpreter: His lawyer's questioning failed to develop a steady rhythm.

Pimlico L.J: What was he convicted of?

Interpreter: It is a Level 4 case and a Class D offence: "Causing a person with a mental disorder to watch a sexual act." It's a breach of Section 33 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Pimlico L.J: What happened?

Appellant: I was shagging this bloke's missus. He walked in on us and went nuts. The offence is the wrong way round. One happened after the other, in my respectful submission.

Pimlico L.J: What do you want the court to do today?

Appellant: Squash my conviction.

Pimlico L.J: Are you in a position to argue this appeal without counsel?

Appellant: Of course, I'm what they call a litigant in person. I'm told you English judges will always bend over backwards to help us.

Pimlico L.J: Us?

Interpreter: Yes my Lord, there are no lawyers in court tonight. Everyone is unrepresented - even the prosecution. It's for the best, don't you think? 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.