Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Holding onto Hope: Gina Rinehart's Bleak House ... Seeking chunks of the huge iron ore pit, Hope Downs ... Tracing the tangled Wright, Hancock, Rinehart litigation ... Allegations of fraud against the family trust ... Manouvering ... Tax "advice" ... Shifting vesting date ... Money, the root of unhappiness ... Anthony-James Kanaan reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Pastoral care ... Election free content … Cardinal sins … The Pope leaves behind the wreckage of his predatory priests … The law keeps victims in check … Litigation loopholes … Latest cases … Catholic Church’s battle to keep the money ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

"Invasion" of the United States ...Trump deportations ... Detention in gulags ... How much of an enemy does an alien have to be? ... Trump judge turns the tables ... Bush's war on terror shows the way ... Forum shopping for habeas cases ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian is taking a break during May ... Normal operations will recommence in June ... 

Justinian's Bloggers

Conclave Part 2: Return of the Prodigal ... Vatican fraudster returns ... And departs ... Another struck-off Cardinal re-emerges ... Blowflies in the Conclave ointment ... What can go wrong? ... Silvana Olivetti reports from Rome ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from London ... Voting at Australia House ... Polling at the Vatican ... Holding down three public service jobs at once ... LibDems want to tone down the noise ... How to foul-up a cover-up ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt on the case in Blighty ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Judgment of the week ... Justice Ian Harrison in the NSW Supremes dismisses apprehended bias application ... Facebook posts by judge's tipstaff ... Claim made by family values applicant that HH's associate supports gay rights ... Battle with a noted sexual equality campaigner ... Purple pride ... Jurisdictional issue ... Finding that cases are decided by judges, not their staff ... From Justinian's Archive, May 10, 2019 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Immigration lore | Main | Biffo at the bar »
Thursday
Jul142011

Judgment time for Molongolo Supremes

Every unhappy court is unhappy in its own way ... ACT government and Supreme Court in long-running stand off ... Delays and despair ... No rush by CJ to welcome new appointment 

As expected ACT chief magistrate John Burns goes to the territory Supremes when Malcolm Gray retires at the end of this month. 

Two more appointments are to come. 

It's anticipated that magistrate Karen Fryar will get Burns' old gig as Chief Madge, but who will get Gray's job as president of the mighty ACT Court of Appeal? 

This is a hard one for a four person court (Higgins CJ, Richard Roughshagger and Hilary Penfolds-Creme-Sherry, plus new boy Burnsy). 

Ideally, it would be good to have someone who can write a judgment in under two years, which narrows the field quite a bit. 

Numerous sources tell us that unhappiness abounds. Chief Justice Terry Higgins is not meaningfully consulted by the ACT government on judicial appointments, and as for the previous two judicial appointments there were "issues". 

Justice Penfold had been a parliamentary draughtsperson and parliamentary counsel and head of the department of parliamentary services, and not a practising lawyer. 

With Refshauge's appointment in 2008 things got off to a tense start. When he was the ACT DPP he published an annual report in which he indicated there was antipathy from the bench towards his office. 

His appointment came as a surprise to the CJ, as the government had not advised the court in advance. 

It is understood that there was also a similar lack of communication concerning Burns' elevation. 

It is understood that as of five days after his appointment was announced, Terry Higgins had not offered his congratulations to the new judge.   

There was been a long-running stand-off between the court and the government. The judges ask for more resources. The government responds by saying there will be adequate funding when the judges demonstrate they are working to capacity. 

The implication being - knock-off the long lunches. 

Despite his solid credentials, Burns' appointment has not gone down well with some at the local bar 'n' grill. This may be the last judicial appointment in the territory for some time. Opportunities are dwindling. 

*   *   *

Recently we reported a two year gestation for one of Creme-Sherry's judgments, now we've come upon one of Roughshaggers that took three years. Well two days short of three years, to be fair. 

QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd was heard on March 13, 2008 and the judgment was handed down on March 11, 2011. 

The injured plaintiff lost.  

Justice Refshauge explained: 

"It is extremely regrettable that the busy workload of the court has delayed the delivery of judgment and these reasons for longer than is desirable. Nevertheless, I have carefully read the whole of the transcript and the exhibits that were tendered at the hearing as well as perusing my contemporaneous notes. I found that I had a good recall of the proceedings and the demeanour of Mr Rice as he gave evidence, notwithstanding the passage of time." 

*   *   *

Background

Fryar: in the running to be Chief MadgeBurns has spent more than 20 years as a Canberra madge. Along with Karen Fryar he made an allegation to the attorney general in 2009 that former CM Rapid Ron Cahill had perverted the course of justice.  

This related to one of Canberra long-running judicial sores concerning an assault charge against a prominent ACT citizen and judicial officer, whose name has been suppressed, even though everyone knows who he is. 

Victorian magistrate Peter Lauritsen came up to try the charge against the prominent, but unmentionable, citizen. 

Rapid Ron was a friend of the accused and helpfully provided Lauritsen with what looked like "submissions for the defence": no prior record, involvement in charitable work, and provocation by the victim. He also included a list of relevant cases and a copy of the suppression order. 

Lauritsen had the impression that he was being "got at". Ron's chambers were raided by the coppers and a few days later he resigned. 

A special commission of wise men, James Wood, Jerrold Cripps and Ted Mulligan, who had been instructed to investigate the matter, was disbanded. 

Constable Plod pressed on for another 10 months, but there was not enough in it to satisfy the DPP that he could get a conviction. 

Ron always said that in providing this material to the interstate magistrate he was just keen to make sure the prosecution ran "appropriately". It's easy to see how people might get a confused impression in a small judicial pond. 

Cahill was never charged and the unmentionable citizen had no conviction recorded in his assault case. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.