Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Tasmanis's Lieutenant Guv (and CJ) Christopher Shenanigans is unlikely to decide the consitiutional impass ... The current guv'nor, former Circuit Court judge and family lawyer Barbara Baker returns to Guv House next week ... Labor hates the Greens and is unlikely to form a coalition government ... Another election looks likely as the numbers for both sides are brittle and unreliable ... However, Baker can ask the Labor leader to test his numbers. 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Mallard - the final curtain | Main | McLure firms »
Wednesday
Jul252012

Julian & Julian

Julian Burnside QC gets the bums rush ... Response from attorney general to questions about US investigations and possible extradition of Julian Assange ... Government reply leaves open the equal possibilities that Canberra knows everything or it knows nothing ... It is certainly doing nothing … Polly Peck reports 

Burnside: seeking answers

THE anticipated obsfurcation from the government arrived this month in reply to Julian Burnside's four questions asked on behalf of his client, Julian Assange. 

The Melbourne silk requested answers from the Attorney General to the following:  

  1. Has Australia asked the US authorities whether Assange has been investigated by the FBI or any other agency; whether a grand jury has been convened to consider charges against him or whether it has found he should be charged; whether an indictment has been prepared; and whether the US intends to seek to have Assange transferred from Sweden to the USA? 
  2. If Australia has asked any of these questions, what reply did it receive? 
  3. If it has not asked these questions, will they be asked? 
  4. Will you seek assurances from the US authorities that if they do seek to move Assange from Sweden to the USA they will give you advance notice of their intention and a reasonable opportunity for the government to oppose the proposed move? 

The fact that a grand jury has been convened in Virginia is hardly a secret. 

See: evidence at Bradley Manning's pre-trial hearing and statement from Justice Department spokesman

It is also known from Manning's case that the FBI investigation into Wikileaks runs to 45,000 pages. 

On previous occasions the Australian government has answered these questions with all the obliqueness a public servant can muster. 

Burnside claims this "arouses legitimate concern about what Australia knows". 

The non-reply from acting AG Jason (Pretty Boy) Clare, written by a departmental drone, said: 

"The Australian government has no advice from the United States to suggest that it has laid any charges against Mr Assange ... [and] no advice that the US will seek Assange's extradition from Sweden." 

Anyway, all these discussions are "conducted in confidence" 

A request for extradition from Sweden is between Sweden and the US, and "Australia would continue to make robust representations that it expects any proceedings to be undertaken in accordance with due process". 

Further, Australia has no standing in this matter. 

The acting attorney general gave no confort on the "temporary surrender" provisions of a US-Sweden bilateral treaty. 

These allow for the "requested state" to interrupt its own legal proceedings so as to permit extradition for a criminal case in the country seeking extradition. 

The government believes that the same protections exist for "temporary surrender" requests as apply in extradition proceedings. 

That is a fine gloss on the reality of temporary surrender. 

What should be read are the redacted Department of Foreign Affairs emails, which show how the government is advised to respond to questions about Assange, the US and extradition.  

See also AG's FOI page

The reply from Jason Clare is straight out of the handbook. It is also evident that Clare has not rocked the boat on his recent schmoozing visit to meet the US attorney general 

In other words, in respect of the US our government retains the traditional lap dog posture. 

A number of other points were made by Burnside, which went completely unremarked by the acting attorney general. 

For instance, it would be open to the US attorney general to arrange for the authorisation of "special administrative measures" should Assange be detained in America. 

These are the same measures that applied to Bradley Manning: solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, torture-light and restricted access to lawyers. 

Further, as with the Manning case, the prospect is that the United States would over-charge Assange in the hope of extracting a plea deal after long confinement. 

Most disturbing of all, is the realisation that George W. Bush's Svengali, Karl (Turd Blossom) Rove has fetched up as chief political adviser to the Swedish Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt - leader of the right leaning pro-USA "Moderate Party". 

Rove: advising Sweden's PM

ROVE is also a confidant of the former prime minister and now Swedish foreign minister, Carl Bildt, who has been outed in a State Department cable as a US informant. 

Bildt was a member of the International Advisory Council of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, a group supporting the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq in 2003. 

Accompanying the Melbourne's silk's missive to the government was a collection of quotes from US government officials, politicians and other worthies on how the US should deal with Assange. 

Robert Beckel took the cake. He's a Fox News "analyst" and a deputy assistant Secretary of State in the Carter administration: 

"A dead man can't leak stuff. This guy's a traitor, a treasonist [sic], and he had broken every law of the United States. And I'm not for the death penalty, so … there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch." 

See: Burnside's letter to the AG

See: Reply from acting AG 

See: Internal government email traffic about Assange 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.