Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Holiday season ... Mother's Day, Lent, Chocolate ... Publisher wants money from Russell Brand for unpublished books ... Paralegal accessed forbidden documents to qualify for legal training contract ... Birthday card payout ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The Vatican Rag | Main | A lustrous place in the sun »
Wednesday
May162012

Keddies drops claim to pay $3.4 million in damages by instalments 

Build-up of verdicts in District Court for overcharging ... Keddies Three put on affidavits as to how poor they are ... Application for time payment withdrawn as prospect of cross-examination looms 

At last count 23 damages cases commenced in the NSW District Court by former overcharged clients have been settled with the Keddies partners. 

The total verdicts this year stand at over $3.4 million and so far the Keddies Three have not paid a cent. 

In fact, they applied to pay by instalments, putting on affidavits as to their financial position - which struck those familiar with the documents as "works of fiction". 

The Keddies Boys are all millionaires, particularly after the $35 million buyout by Slater & Gordon, payable in three instalments. 

The actions against Keddies are in damages for overcharging and fraud.  

A District Court registrar refused the request for time payment of the verdicts, and an appeal was notified. 

Stephen Firth, solicitor for the plaintiffs, indicated that Russell Keddie, Scott Roulstone and Tony Barakat would be required for cross-examination on their financial statements. 

Promptly they withdrew the application for payment over time. 

Throughout the entire Keddies' saga, the partners at each step of the way have steadfastly avoided going into the box for cross-examination.  

The highest outstanding judgment is for almost $400,000 plus costs in the Mahmoud Zoulfikar case and the smallest is for $10,000, inclusive, in the Rosalind Fryer case. 

More claims are banking-up. 

It would awful if any of the three went broke.  

See: Table of outstanding judgments against Keddies

See earlier report: Keddies latest trick 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.