Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« The Vatican Rag | Main | A lustrous place in the sun »
Wednesday
May162012

Keddies drops claim to pay $3.4 million in damages by instalments 

Build-up of verdicts in District Court for overcharging ... Keddies Three put on affidavits as to how poor they are ... Application for time payment withdrawn as prospect of cross-examination looms 

At last count 23 damages cases commenced in the NSW District Court by former overcharged clients have been settled with the Keddies partners. 

The total verdicts this year stand at over $3.4 million and so far the Keddies Three have not paid a cent. 

In fact, they applied to pay by instalments, putting on affidavits as to their financial position - which struck those familiar with the documents as "works of fiction". 

The Keddies Boys are all millionaires, particularly after the $35 million buyout by Slater & Gordon, payable in three instalments. 

The actions against Keddies are in damages for overcharging and fraud.  

A District Court registrar refused the request for time payment of the verdicts, and an appeal was notified. 

Stephen Firth, solicitor for the plaintiffs, indicated that Russell Keddie, Scott Roulstone and Tony Barakat would be required for cross-examination on their financial statements. 

Promptly they withdrew the application for payment over time. 

Throughout the entire Keddies' saga, the partners at each step of the way have steadfastly avoided going into the box for cross-examination.  

The highest outstanding judgment is for almost $400,000 plus costs in the Mahmoud Zoulfikar case and the smallest is for $10,000, inclusive, in the Rosalind Fryer case. 

More claims are banking-up. 

It would awful if any of the three went broke.  

See: Table of outstanding judgments against Keddies

See earlier report: Keddies latest trick 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.