Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Litigation prophylaxis | Main | The mad dash to mediocrity »
Monday
Dec122011

Keddies must be kidding

New law year blasts off with contempt trial of three Keddies' partners … Cheque signed by Roulstone prime facie a breach of court order

After another round of spatting in the NSW Supremes between Justice Michael Adams and barrister Chris Branson, the hearing of contempt allegation against the Keddies Three has been set for February 3.

It is alleged by Sydney solicitor Stephen Firth, acting for a bunch of disaffected former Keddies' clients who have brought overcharging and breach of contract cases, that Tony Barakat, Scott Roulstone and Russell Keddie breached an injunction ordered by Adams on November 24.

The injunction sought to prevent Keddies or its agents communicating with former clients who were suing them in the District Court.

Today Adams inquired when the defendants would be ready to answer the contempt charges.

Branson, for the Keddies Three said: 

"I have not paid meticulous attention to what was necessary to meet the charge."  

The judge was amazed at this response, querying why a barrister acting for three solicitors on contempt of court charges would not have properly prioritised this matter.

Robert Stitt QC, for Firth and plaintiff clients, stressed the urgency in bringing the matter on for a hearing.

Any delay in proceedings would make a "solemn farce" of the injunction.

Stitt also accused the defence of stalling on a notice to produce documents, which had been filed on December 8.

He described Branson's reluctance to meet the notice to produce as part of their "same old story" of attempting to delay proceedings.

A further question arising from today's hearing was whether a cheque made out to a former Keddies' client, Xi Li, was evidence of contempt.

The cheque was signed by Scott Roulstone and drawn on a joint account held in the name of all three Keddies' partners.

Stitt submitted that this evidence implicated all three Keddies' partners in an attempt to compromise the proceedings by paying-out a so-called "affected client".

Such a communication would be contrary to the injunction.

Justice Adams was concerned about the current formulation of the contempt charges.

He described them as "ambiguous" on the matter of whether Barakat and Keddie consented to drawing the cheque.

The judge said he would have difficulty finding Barakat and Keddie complicit in the transaction if Roulstone merely possessed some "general authority" to act on their behalf by drawing on the joint account.

Adams recommended that Stitt amend the charges to include "knowledge and agreement" as the evidentiary basis for the allegation against Barakat and Keddie.

Seventeen days after the contempt hearing, the court will come back to the issue of the injunction and the damages claimed by Firth arising from the interference with his clients. That has been listed for five days. 

See previous report: "Grave disapproval" of Keddies

From Brigit Morris in Court 12B, Queens Square

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.