Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Lubyanka ... Bullying investigation into former Federal Court judge goes nowhere ... "Complaint unsubstantiated" ... Phew! ... Recommendations about staff education ... Nothing recommended for judicial induction ... More >> 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Litigation prophylaxis | Main | The mad dash to mediocrity »
Monday
Dec122011

Keddies must be kidding

New law year blasts off with contempt trial of three Keddies' partners … Cheque signed by Roulstone prime facie a breach of court order

After another round of spatting in the NSW Supremes between Justice Michael Adams and barrister Chris Branson, the hearing of contempt allegation against the Keddies Three has been set for February 3.

It is alleged by Sydney solicitor Stephen Firth, acting for a bunch of disaffected former Keddies' clients who have brought overcharging and breach of contract cases, that Tony Barakat, Scott Roulstone and Russell Keddie breached an injunction ordered by Adams on November 24.

The injunction sought to prevent Keddies or its agents communicating with former clients who were suing them in the District Court.

Today Adams inquired when the defendants would be ready to answer the contempt charges.

Branson, for the Keddies Three said: 

"I have not paid meticulous attention to what was necessary to meet the charge."  

The judge was amazed at this response, querying why a barrister acting for three solicitors on contempt of court charges would not have properly prioritised this matter.

Robert Stitt QC, for Firth and plaintiff clients, stressed the urgency in bringing the matter on for a hearing.

Any delay in proceedings would make a "solemn farce" of the injunction.

Stitt also accused the defence of stalling on a notice to produce documents, which had been filed on December 8.

He described Branson's reluctance to meet the notice to produce as part of their "same old story" of attempting to delay proceedings.

A further question arising from today's hearing was whether a cheque made out to a former Keddies' client, Xi Li, was evidence of contempt.

The cheque was signed by Scott Roulstone and drawn on a joint account held in the name of all three Keddies' partners.

Stitt submitted that this evidence implicated all three Keddies' partners in an attempt to compromise the proceedings by paying-out a so-called "affected client".

Such a communication would be contrary to the injunction.

Justice Adams was concerned about the current formulation of the contempt charges.

He described them as "ambiguous" on the matter of whether Barakat and Keddie consented to drawing the cheque.

The judge said he would have difficulty finding Barakat and Keddie complicit in the transaction if Roulstone merely possessed some "general authority" to act on their behalf by drawing on the joint account.

Adams recommended that Stitt amend the charges to include "knowledge and agreement" as the evidentiary basis for the allegation against Barakat and Keddie.

Seventeen days after the contempt hearing, the court will come back to the issue of the injunction and the damages claimed by Firth arising from the interference with his clients. That has been listed for five days. 

See previous report: "Grave disapproval" of Keddies

From Brigit Morris in Court 12B, Queens Square

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.