Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Holiday season ... Mother's Day, Lent, Chocolate ... Publisher wants money from Russell Brand for unpublished books ... Paralegal accessed forbidden documents to qualify for legal training contract ... Birthday card payout ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« When you wish upon a Tarr | Main | Barristers required to divulge fees for Hong Kong "sittings" »
Friday
Feb032012

Keddies stuck in the stalls

Judge decides no reasonable person could think he was prejudiced against former Keddies' partners ... Stay also refused ... Contempt hearing against Keddies boys now set for February 16 ... Brigit Morris reporting from the NSW Supremes 

This morning (Feb. 3) Justice Michael Adams dismissed an application that he step aside from hearing contempt proceedings against the Keddies Three on the ground of apprehended bias.

The former Keddies' partners (Russell Keddie, Scott Roulstone and Tony Barakat) are defending a contempt charge for allegedly breaching an injunction forbidding them approaching former clients.

The clients are suing Keddies in the District Court for allegedly mishandling their settlement moneys.

In his swift refusal of the application against him continuing to sit Justice Adams held that no fair-minded, lay observer could reasonably apprehend any prejudice by him towards the defendants. 

The response from Chris Branson QC, for the defendants, was to file an application to stay the contempt proceedings.

Branson relied on last December's High Court decision in Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls, where the majority held that a failure by a party to proceedings to seek leave against the refusal of an application for bias, would preclude the right of that party to appeal the decision in final judgment.

Robert Stitt QC, for Stephen Firth, the solicitor acting for Keddies' disaffected former clients, pressed the urgency of concluding the contempt hearing.

Stitt said that in light of the defence's use of stalling tactics to delay the contempt proceedings the matter should be resolved quickly.

The application for a stay of proceedings was also refused. Adams' reasons for dismissing the application will be published on Monday (Feb. 6).

The contempt of court hearing has been adjourned until February 16.

Justice Adams' reasons in full 

Brigit Morris reporting

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.