Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Polly gets a cracker ... The Parrot falls from his bully pulpit … Performances … The end of the Wharf Revue … Bruce McClintock on stage at The Onion Club … Freaks on the loose in Washington ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Helen Haines looks on concerned & calls out NACC’s Paul Brereton after he claims ppl referring cases to NACC “Doesn’t mean” they’re concerned of “corruption”😳🤦‍♂️ Haines “would be a fair assumption that most ppl referring to NACC would be doing so bcoz” of “corrupt behaviour”🔥

[image or embed]

— stranger (@strangerous.bsky.social) November 22, 2024 at 5:22 PM

 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Vitamin D deficiency ... Anti-vax solicitor birched for "friendly warning" to schools ... Budget measures hit private school fee payers and their personal jets ... Robing room "humour" ... Equality and sensitivity training missing in action ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Over many years, certain journalists employed by Nine (formerly Fairfax) newspapers have been resentful of our client’s prominence as a commentator on many political and cultural issues, and the malicious and concocted allegations giving rise to the imputations constitute a concerted attempt to destroy our client’s reputation. 

Following the Sydney Morning Herald's exposure ... Mark O'Brien, Alan Jones' solicitor, December 12, 2023  ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Fee, fi, fo, fight | Main | Goodbye Gummow »
Wednesday
Oct102012

Keddies update

It's foggy in Barakat-Land ... Is that a Le Wrap? ... Settlement likely with Mrs K ... Hiding assets in clumsy deceits on creditors is something up with which the Law Society should not put 

A young Russell Keddie (left) hiking his way to a fortune

WHAT'S the latest with the Keddies Katastrophe, I hear you cry? 

Word from Max Donnelly, the receiver of Russell Keddie's bankrupt estate, is that a committee of inspection has been created to go through Russ's affairs. 

The committee mainly represents the clients of Firths Compo Lawyers, who had won a slate of overcharging cases against the old Keddies' law shop. 

Negotiations are underway with Mrs Keddie (aka Sarah Key) over properties in Sydney and London that are in her name and in which, at various stages, her struck-off hubby had an interest.  

An offer is on the table and Donnelly is hopeful of a settlement with Mrs K.

Claims against Russell's estate total between $21-22 million.  

*   *   *

Pitt St, Redfern: all quiet at Barakat & Co

MEANWHILE, a fog has descended over the affairs of Tony Barakat. 

No one is willing to give us a straight answer as to whether he is still trading as Barton Lawyers and if the Law Society has asked him to show cause why his ticket shouldn't be cancelled. 

Surely, there's a serious issue here - a bankrupt solicitor trading as a sole practitioner. 

Barakat is still listed by the Law Society as an "unrestricted principal". 

Details of his legal services are here

One would have thought the amount of Barakat family treasure salted in trusts and way from the grasping hands of creditors would sufficiently prompt those charged with protecting the honour and glory of the solicitors' trade. 

See: Bankruptcy bollocks  

See: No doubt about it

The Law Society says it won't say anything because the matter is confidential but that "if the council of he Law Society decides that any action should be taken" then it will be in touch.  

We asked Barakat what was going on. 

"Are you still in practice with Barton Lawyers or have you moved to a different firm? 

Also, has the Law Society asked you to show cause in relation to your PC?" 

We added that there were rumours swirling around, so we needed clarification. 

Barakat wanted to know "what rumours" and "by the way, are you a lawyer?" 

Funny, that was what we wanted to know of him. 

Justinian replied: 

"I'm trying to confirm whether you are still in practice and whether the Law Society has done anything about your bankruptcy?" 

The screen went blank and at the time of going to press there was no reply. 

We also believe that that the "costs consultancy" Barakat operated as a way of running harassment on Stephen Firth has also shut-up shop. 

Maybe Tony will immerse himself in his fast food business, Le Wrap. 

*   *   *

 

WHETHER former Law Society senior vice-president Scott Roulstone will be asked to show cause by his old chums is a withering thought. 

We know Barakat's trustee PPB Advisory got a Federal Court order on August 10 to freeze $1.6 million the solicitor was trying to squirrel into his Vanair Trust. 

He had attempt to move this money into Vanair just before he filed his debtor's petition in order to repay a "loan" the trust had made to him. 

If bankrupt lawyers can crudely attempt to hide assets so as to do down their creditors then there is a "fit and proper" question, quite apart from how they manage to run solicitors' trust accounts in these circumstances. 

The question is so demanding an answer that everyone has gone catatonic. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.