Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Tricks of the publishing trade | Main | Flattery aside »
Wednesday
Mar012006

Lap dancing in court

Girls in court ... The US Supreme Court may have had a deflating effect on Anna Nicole Smith's allure, however in London the Court of Appeal was skittish over one of the lasses from Tottenham Court Road's Spearmint Rhino Club ... Murky payments ... Shenanigans ... From Justinian's archive, March 2006  

Anna Nicole Smith on her way to the US Supreme Court (pic: Reuters)

Dahlia Lithwick complained in Slate that even in the case of Anna Nicole Smith, the US Supreme Court "somehow scatters its own unique brand of boringness and uptightness over every drama it touches". 

As Dahlia tantalising noted:

"[Anna Nicole] has stepped into the only place in America where her breasts have no power." 

Not that every superior court is so drained of life, because we've come upon a wonderful instance of relaxed cheekiness that issued from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, in the case of the lap dancer and the loans. 

It's a story as old as the oldest profession.

Lap dancer (Kay Hutchison) met R.O.B. (rich old bastard), in this instance Kieran Sutton.

She commenced a "relationship" with him, gouging a cosy £100,000 for "services rendered".

These included £800 for the pleasure of the dancer's company at dinner.

She ends the relationship after a year - she already has a boyfriend.

Life on Tottenham Court RdR.O.B. got nasty about the dumping and wanted his dosh back.

Sutton goes to court saying the monies were "loans". He recovers £73,000 and young Kay appeals on the grounds of "perversity" - but, alas, to no avail. 

We're delighted to bring you tid bits of Lord Justice Ward's droll, but racy, leading judgment: 

LORD JUSTICE WARD: The appellant is a lap dancer. I would not, of course, begin to know exactly what that involves.  One can guess at it, but could not faithfully describe it. The [trial] judge tantalisingly tells us, at paragraph 21 of his judgment, that the purpose is "to tease but not to satisfy".   

By about the end of 2002, or early in 2003, the appellant seems to have begun to tease the respondent. He, being a rich businessman, sought, no doubt, to enliven his lonely evenings in London by seeking entertainment at the Spearmint Rhino club in Tottenham Court Road where the appellant was then employed.

Having been tempted, he managed to obtain her telephone number and invited her to dinner. It was not exactly the traditional boy meets girl, 'let's have dinner, darling' kind of invitation.

It was an invitation which she accepted, but entirely on the basis that she would be there as his escort and, as his escort, she would provide the services of companionship and amusement, but for a consideration.

That consideration would amount, according to the judgment, to perhaps about £700 or £800 a night for the pleasure of her company at dinner.

But the arrangement was made on a number of occasions and, as they went on, the relationship changed and at some time early in 2003 it is common ground that the services included sexual services, for which even more money was paid as a consideration.

Whether or not Rule Two of the Spearmint Rhino Club had been breached, requiring that you could get no satisfaction, we do not know and fortunately do not have to decide.   

[snip]

The [trial] judge, moreover, had evidence from a Miss Banks who, in the context of this case, has the most unfortunate nickname of Lolly. She, too, works at the Spearmint Rhino Club, and so knew both of these parties. 

She gave evidence to the judge that on two occasions during the year, in conversation with Miss Hutchinson, Miss Hutchinson acknowledged that she was obtaining loans from Mr Sutton.

The judge believed her and that supported his finding.   

The judge therefore had, it seems to me, ample evidence from which to reach the conclusion I have read from paragraph 56 of his judgment that the documents were supportive of Mr Sutton's case.

They were, in my view, overwhelmingly supportive of his case and they were more than sufficient to outweigh any challenges about the murky payments of the monies in and out of accounts designed to act as some kind of ledger for the financial transactions between these parties but, at the same time, provide some kind of cover, obscure though it may be, for his conducting the shenanigans with her, as a married man which his wife would not like to know about."

Appeal dismissed. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.