Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Sixty years on ... | Main | Rise of the refuseniks »
Monday
Oct242011

Looking at the backend

Advice from OIL sets off fiery questions from oily senator about the Malaysian Solution ... Meeting a dead-bat at the estimates committee ... What's happened to the federal courts Bill? ... Meanwhile, there's a quiet review into integrating the "backend" of federal courts and tribunals ... Polly Peck reports from Canberra 

Three times a year weary public servants trudge up the Hill for grilling by smug senators at estimates committees. 

It is not difficult for even the thickest party hack lounging on the red leather to dig-up some exciting, new ineptitude on the part of the government. 

One of the more fruitful lines of inquiry was Gillard's Malaysian Solution, kyboshed 6-1 by the High Court and them reintroduced into parliament with no prospect of getting through.

Last week saw the head of the AG's department, Roger (Bow-Tie) Wilkins, and the minister in the chair Joe Ludwig, go to inordinate lengths to shield the head of the departmental office of international law from questions by members of the senate legal and constitutional affairs committee. 

Only last month, the government rather unwisely revealed OIL was "closely consulted" and had "confirmed" the Malaysia legislation was "consistent with Australia's international obligations". 

Anywhere else this would have constituted a waiver of privilege, but having released advice from solicitor general Stephen Gageler the government was in no mind to release anything further.

Wilkins and Ludwig steadfastly blocked any questions about the OIL advice from frothy George (Soapie) Brandis. 

Senator Brandis:  I am asking you, Mr Manning, in your official capacity as the senior representative of the office of international law, whether in your view -

Senator Ludwig:  That is another way of asking the same question.

Senator Brandis:  The arrangement signed by the government of Australia and the government of Malaysia on 31 July is in all respects compliant with Australia's obligations under the Refugee Convention.

Mr Wilkins:  Perhaps the best way of characterising it is that we provided advice to the government and the government is happy that the Malaysian deal is consistent with and has expressed the view that they believe it is consistent with Australia's international obligations. Further than that I do not think it is fair to go. I certainly do not think it is fair to ask Mr Manning those questions.

Senator Brandis:  Mr Wilkins, you are a reasonably experienced public servant who has appeared before this committee many times. Might I just observe that it has not gone unnoticed by anybody following these proceedings that you are shielding Mr Manning from answering my question.

Senator Ludwig:  Let me shield Mr Manning. It is not up to you, Senator Brandis, to accuse Mr Wilkins - 

On it went for a good part of an hour without much illumination of the nature of the 11 pieces of advice OIL had given the government. 

*   *   *

With all the time consumed trying to explore Julia's foreign folly, there was nothing left over to investigate what on earth is going on in relation to federal courts and tribunals.

Legislation to merge the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court and create the Australian Military Court has been listed for introduction into parliament for nearly the last two years but  - to use suitable military parlance - it has gone AWOL.

In the meantime, the insurgency led by the FMC Workers Liberation Front has gathered pace demanding better pay and conditions for its sadly under-appreciated and unloved members.

Having secured themselves their own cookie jar and an increase in superannuation entitlements in the last budget, the Liberation Front is now set to argue in the High Court their independence is being threatened by being denied a full judicial pension.

Maybe the real problem is their failure to appreciate how impoverished they would be when they accepted the $330,000 plus job.   

And federal madges haven't picked the best time to come with outstretched hands.

Currently underway is a quiet review of courts and tribunals.

After agitating on the issue for yonks, the Department of Finance finally got its way earlier this year and had a review established to explore "options for shared services and administrative arrangements".

Headed by Mallys' consultant Stephen Skehill the review team has been meeting with senior managers of federal tribunals and courts to assess whether they are "financially viable in their current form".

With Wayne Swan looking under every couch and car seat for a few more savings to enable the government to meet its goal of returning to surplus next year, it doesn't take much to imagine the outcome of this review- but don't be surprised if the Federal Court being a major winner.

And tribunals shouldn't expect any easier time if there is a change of government. Joe Hockey will be looking for even more savings after they have repealed the carbon and mining taxes, filled a $10 billion blackhole and handed out tax cuts.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.