Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... Latest from the trouble prone Queensland branch of the Federales ... Administrative law upsets ... Sandy Street overturned ... On the level in Canberra ... Missing aged care accountant ... Law shop managing director skewered ... Ginger Snatch reports from courtrooms around the nation ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Smoke and mirrors ... Spiritual notes … Bishop fends off claim for damages from victim of priestly abuse … How does this work? … Victoria protects politician with DV offences … An oppressive no-publication regime … Celebrity judge battles antisemitism from the gala dinner circuit ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's Hitlerish ... Reelection of a charlatan ... Republicans take popular vote for the first time in 20 years ... Amnesia ... Trashing a democracy ... Trump and his team of troubled men ... Mainstream media wilts in the eye of the storm ... Depravity, greed and revenge are the new normal ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Change of guard at the High Court ... Richard Glenn appointed CEO and Executive Director of the Court ... The same Richard Glenn who as Commonwealth Ombudsman was birched over mishandling a report into the legality of Robodebt ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Shmagatha Shmistie 2.0 ... Another round with Vardy and Rooney ... Remote evidence from a witness - on the bus ... Brazilian magistrate looses his shirt ... CV qualifications propped up by pork pies ... Fast justice by Scissors & Paste ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt in London with the latest regrettable court-related conduct ... Read more >> 

"Today is about Dad's wishes and confirming all of our support for him and for his wishes. It shouldn't be difficult or controversial. Love you, Lachlan."   

Lachlan Murdoch's text message to his sister Elisabeth on the eve of a special meeting to discuss altering the family trust so that Lachlan would run and control News Corp and Fox News ... Quoted in the opinion of the Nevada Probate Commissioner who ruled against changing the terms of the trust ... The New York Times, December 9, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The great interceptor ... Rugby League ... Dennis Tutty and the try he shouldn't have scored ... Case that changed the face of professional sport ... Growth of the player associations, courtesy of the Barwick High Court ... Free kick ... Restraint of trade ... Braham Dabscheck comments ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Litigation's artful delays ... From Justinian's archive ... April 22, 2014 ... Lawyers and the complexity of litigation ... Delay as a defence tactic ... Access to justice includes preventing access to justice ... Reprising the Flower & Hart saga with starring role by Ian Callinan QC ... Abuse of process ... Queensland CJ declined to intervene ... Tulkinghorn on the case  ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Secret justice | Main | Adversarialism and the binary nature of the legal system »
Sunday
Oct162011

Montage of an Italian stallion

Styles v Clayton Utz ... Two judgments dealing with pleadings in the sex discrimination case against the large law shop ... Taunting photos ... Unfunny parodies ... Sexual tension ... Metro manwhoreishness 

The Izzo photos, which are a key component of the sexual harassment case brought by Bridgette Styles against Clayton Utz, have been on display in NSW Supremes. 

Clutz's objections to the latest round of Styles' proposed amended pleadings proved successful. 

Two photos are in contention - a montage of pix of Luis Izzo with post-it note bubbles or captions and a separate framed photo of him. 

Both were placed close to Styles' office at Clutz and she says they made her the subject of sexual jokes. 

At the time both Styles and Izzo were employees of Clayton Utz in the workplace relations group. 

Styles submission was that the photos were sexualised in themselves and the sexual harassment did not depend on the context in which they were displayed. 

However, it was conceded that there were no particulars in the pleadings to sustain that position. 

The plaintiff submitted that she took objection to the sexualised nature of photos of Izzo at the time she saw them, and not merely in hindsight. 

Styles contends that rumours abounded while she was employed at Clayton Utz as to whether she was sexually involved with Izzo. 

She alleges that people asked her directly whether that was the case, after she had engaged in a single "one-night stand" with him. 

Izzo & Styles

The montage and the framed photo were discussed in detail in the redacted reasons of Justice Lucy McCallum dealing with the pleadings, dated September 5.  

That judgment has only just been published following submissions as to which parts should be removed to avoid prejudicing a February jury trial of Styles' defamation proceedings against Clayton Utz and Izzo. 

The montage itself is not in evidence, only a poor quality photo of it. Apparently the item "had not been retained" by Clayton Utz. 

In this most recent round on the pleadings Styles wanted to insert new paragraphs into the amended statement of claim: 

"25A The montage appeared to the plaintiff to be a joke lampooning Izzo's reputation within the Sydney office as a man who had slept with a number of colleagues.

Particulars

The plaintiff drew this conclusion based on her observations that:

(i) Izzo's reputation, as a Casanova, was based on his conduct in boasting about having slept with colleagues including her:

(ii) the montage was located outside her office:

(iii) the montage contained no apparent reference to Izzo's work as a solicitor;

(iv) the montage contained, instead, a text bubble stating: '[We're] pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking [Luis]. We hope you plan on figuring out what that is'; and

(v) the montage contained a photograph of Izzo making what the plaintiff understood to be a sexualised hand gesture:

Particulars

The hand gesture is formed by extending the index and little fingers while holding the middle and ring fingers down with the thumb." 

Izzo montageMcCallum concluded that those matters are not capable of sustaining the allegation that the montage is in itself conduct of a sexual nature in relation to the plaintiff. 

"I do not see anything in [the montage] that is objectively capable of meeting the description contended for by the plaintiff." 

In relation to the framed photo of Izzo, the plaintiff sought to add that it ... 

"was perceived by the plaintiff to be a joke of a sexual nature, implying she was 'in love' with Izzo, because people generally only keep, in expensive looking photograph frames in their offices, flattering portraits of adults whom they 'love', namely their romantic partners or spouses." 

This suffered from the same difficulties as the montage. The judge said: 

"In my view the contention that the display of an anodyne photograph is capable of taking on a sexual character (as so to amount in itself to conduct of a sexual nature) on the ground of the perception pleaded is objectively unsustainable."  

Styles also sought an order in the following terms:  

(g) [the framed photograph] was recognized by the plaintiff to be a substantially enlarged A4 copy of Izzo's 'Clayton Utz intranet photograph', which fact reinforced her perception it was a sexualised joke, given that said intranet photograph was the subject of an email (the 'Manwhore Email') which, to the knowledge of the plaintiff at the time: 

(a) had been sent by members of the workplace relations group from Izzo's email address:

(b) to a significant number of other employees:

(c) as a parody of Izzo's sexual desirability, in that the plaintiff was aware it contained words to like effect of those that it does contain, namely:

a. I have an intranet photograph to die for;

b. I am THE Italian Stallion:

c. I have the best hair in all of Sydney; 

d. If I see you in the lift, I'll grace you with a head nod... But please don't come up to me at work drinks - I'll just pretend I don't know you;

e. In metro-manwhoreness, Luis 'Greasy' Izzo, Solicitor/ Workplace Relations/Clayton Utz. 

The framed pic of IzzoJustice McCallum observed: 

"The proposition that a standard head and shoulders shot of a man in a suit, whether or not placed in an extensive looking frame, could have sexual connotations or be understood to be a sexualised joke, is in my view untenable." 

Finally, the plaintiff wanted a further amendment, claiming that the law firm detrimentally failed to "properly investigate the montage and framed photograph". 

The judge found that, "the logical difficulty with the plaintiff's claim ... is that the gist of the complaint accuses the defendants, as it appears, of failing to investigate something that was never brought to their attention". 

That disposed of Styles' most recent notice of motion. 

It's all available here.  

And the redacted September 5 judgment is here   

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.