Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Being a lawyer can be sheer misery ... Psychological distress ... Workplace incivility ... Lack of support ... Rotten culture ... Report on wellbeing ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"One wonders whether a murderer who later contributes to society might be treated better that Heydon has been." 

Janet Albrechtsen in The Australian seeking the resurrection of former justice Dyson Heydon whose sexual predations ruined the legal careers of young women associates at the High Court ... April 11, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Take your hands out of your pockets | Main | What news on the Rialto? »
Sunday
Sep232012

No porridge for spending money illegally

Midway through the High Court's hearing of the Williams' case the government spotted a problem ... Hurried amendments to avoid the possibility of someone going to jail ... Parliament's surrender to the executive ... Rescuing the public service as well as the chaplains ... Polly Peck reports  

Rom Williams: took on the executive's spending power (pic Alan Pryke)

THERE'S an interesting little wrinkle flowing from Williams v The Commonwealth - better known as the case that scuppered the funding arrangements for school chaplains and other god-botherers. 

The case was heard by the court on August 9, 10 and 11, last year and the findings were handed down on June 20, 2012.  

A majority of the court found that successive governments had behaved unconstitutionally in entering into these non-legislative funding agreements. 

During the hearing a few mandarins from the administration turned up in court and paid close attention to what was going on. 

There was a distinct sense the Commonwealth was in difficulty, and that difficulty went beyond the funding of chaplains to the myriad of special interest programs where cash is shovelled out without parliamentary approval. 

So what did the mandarins do? 

They rushed back the Department of Finance and pored over the Financial Management and Accountability Act, with particular attention to s.26: 

"Drawing rights required for payment etc. of public money

An official or minister must not do any of the following except as authorised by a valid drawing right: 

(a) make a payment of public money, etc … 

Penalty: imprisonment for 2 years." 

Yikes! Two years in the clink for spending money unconstitutionally. 

The Commonwealth Solicitor General Stephen Gageler SC, as he then was, had drawn the court's attention to s.26 on day two of the hearing.  

He argued that the Commonwealth had met the necessary conditions for payment of the money, including that sufficient funds were available for the program, the availability of which had been the subject of an appropriation and the existence of a drawing right under s.26(a) of FMAA. 

Yet it was shaky and if the court didn't swallow that proposition then penalties loomed. 

Parliamentary counsel swung into action and as soon as possible after parliament resumed this year the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No.1) was introduced on February 16. 

Among other tinkering it repealed the penalty provision of s.26 of the FMAA with the amendment taking effect from April 5. 

In the second reading speech the government said the reason for the repeal was that, "it had never been used for a prosecution". 

The penalty for unconstitutionally entering into spending agreements with the Scripture Union of Queensland, or anyone else on the drip without legislative approval, has now vanished. 

Best to be sure, I suppose - particularly as the later amendments to the FMAA in June this year, to give effect to the High Court's findings, have come in for sniping. 

Prof. Anne Twomey from Sydney Uni cast doubt on whether the Bill effectively addressed the problems identified by the High Court - that there must be a head of legislative power to support spending programs. 

The government and the parliament addressed the problem by dumping into regulations a whole pile of existing and future programs - 427 of them. 

The legislation was passed in just over three hours. 

As Prof. Twomey says

"It it an abject surrender of parliament's powers of financial scrutiny to the executive, and all to save a few chaplains (possibly ineffectively) ... 

The Commonwealth is clearly asking for another clobbering by the court." 

At least now no ministers or public servants are going to wind-up doing porridge. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.