Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Pale, male and stale ... Trump’s George III revival … Change the channel … No news about George Pell is the preferred news … ACT corruption investigation into the Cossack and Planet Show gets closer to the finishing line … How to empty an old house with a chainsaw ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Charities Commission provides details of the staggering amounts of loot in which the College of Knowledge is wallowing ... Little wonder Bell CJ and others are on the warpath ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... T.S Eliot gets it wrong ... Harry cleans up in a fresh round with Murdoch's hacking hacks ... All aboard Rebekah Brooks' "clean ship" ... Windy woman restrained from further flatulent abuse ... Trump claims "sovereign immunity" to skip paying legal costs of £300,000 ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Saints Go Marching In ... Cash cow has to claw its way back to the LCA's inner sanctum ... Stephen Estcourt cleans up in Mercury settlement ... Amex rides two horses in expiring guarantee cases ... Simmo bins the paperwork ... Attorneys General should not come from the solicitors' branch ... Goings On from February 9, 2009 ... Read more >>


 

 

« Some good, some turnips | Main | Pressing issues »
Saturday
Jan012000

Orifice politics

The ghastly events leading up to John Marsden's defamation action against Channel 7 ... Huge drama following the president of the NSW Law Society's decision to out himself as gay ... Accusations in parliament, on television and from former employee ... Confusion about underage sex 

Dunbier in party modeWhat we are witnessing is the sour remains of an old friendship being played out for our edification on the TV screen by a couple of gay blades.

Ronnie Dunbier (Gorman Dunbier of Campbelltown) alleged on Channel 7's Today Tonight (March 13, 1995) that former President of the NSW Law Society John Marsden regularly had sex with boys who were underage.

Invariably they were clients of the firm in criminal matters, he said.

Dunbier knew of at least a dozen of them and had supplied the names of five to the NSW Police Royal Commission.

Dunbier assisted Channel 7 in its hatchet job on Marsden. For years he has loathed his former boss.

But allegations between the two have been flying around for yonks. Dunbier claims Marsden threatened to expose his homosexuality to his father, who was a significant client of Marsden's practice.

Dunbier says he and his partner, Bryan Gorman, have run up a bill of $100,000 in defending the practice against investigations by the Law Society, inspired by Marsden or his colleagues.

Marsden says he has never personally lodged a complain against Dunbier, "as at today's date".

In turn, Dunbier has made complaints to the Law Society about Marsden. 

This activity would also suggest a war for clients in the Campbelltown legal services market.

Marsden also claims that Dunbier's work was not up to scratch and that various client problems had to be unscrambled after he left Marsdens.

Dunbier and Marsden cannot even agree if they had been "fuck buddies".

Today Tonight produced two uni-identified rent boys to say that they had sex with Marsden in 1970 when they were 15!

One of them said that Marsden in his Mercedes picked him up at the Cross, paid him to go to his home near Campbelltown, sniff amyl-nitrate, have sex and be hit with a leather strap. (A real bargain at $50 for the whole lot.)

Both rent boys, cutely named witnesses A and B in the TV program, said they had terrible memories of Marsden.

Channel 7 might have been more careful depending on the word of a couple of lads of the night. Remember Elton John.

Marsden claims that he has never met one of these chaps. He is, however, acting for the fellow's wife in a bitter family law dispute. 

There are a couple of statutory declarations floating about that allege Dunbier paid a former client of Marsden's to make some damaging allegations against the ex-Law Society president.

The declarations signed by two solicitors from Corrs in Sydney are to the effect that Dunbier had paid the former client $30,000 in two $15,000 cheques and bought him a Holden car.

Dunbier says that those statements are of no significance and hat he had been stood over by the former client.

The whole series of allegations and counter allegations has been extremely entertaining.

Marsden's lawyer, Olympic hero and Corrs' chairman, Rod McGeoch, had advised Marsden to shut up, keep out of the media and put his head down.

Marsden: too much informationMarsden had damaged himself with his disarming openness about his sex life.

Three years ago, when he was President of the NSW Law Society, Marsden decided to "come out" about his homosexuality in the intimate confines of ABC TV's 7.30 Report. Being "proactive" was the best way to face down any untoward allegations, he thought.

Things started to unravel following the allegation last December that he was a paedophile, made under parliamentary privilege by Labor MP Deirdre Grusovin (sister of Laurie "Botany" Brereton) and based on a statutory declaration by known pederast Colin Fisk. 

Subsequently, in early February this year (1995), Marsden produced a new statutory declaration in which Fisk admitted that at the time he made his original statement he was under psychiatric care and unable to differentiate "fact from fiction". 

He also claimed that the original statutory declaration had been dictated by Mrs Grusovin and typed by her advisor, Mr Ron Hicks.

Mr Fisk has since disappeared from view.

Marsden was in unequivocal mode at his February press conference: "I have never had sex with anyone underage," he said.

"I have received offensive phone calls in the middle of the night to my home and unfortunately some public taunting. I have been publically humiliated. It is utterly painful to be accused of something you are not guilty of." 

He then decided to accept the kind invitation of the ABC's Ellen Fanning to appear again on the 7.30 Report.

Once more he thought that this strategy would head off accusations and innuendo about his "lifestyle".

That program went to air on February 28.

There were no parameters agreed for the Ellen Fanning interview and Marsden did not see the tape before it went to air.

Again McGeoch counselled against going on the program, but Mars Bar would not be stopped.

He thought that by opening up he would head off Channel 7, which he knows has a reporter digging up some filth.

Indeed, on the 7.30 Report an unidentified figure said that a media organisation had offered rewards if information was forthcoming against Marsden.

In retrospect MGeoch was right. It was folly for Marsden to appear on the ABC. 

He started off saying, "No one out there will say that John Marsden is a pederast", and then went on to admit to the possibility of having had an "accident" with an underage boy. 

He said that the allegations against him would not have been made if he had been a heterosexual, but he agreed that there is a link made in the community's mind between homosexuality and paedophilia.

Fanning: Do you consider yourself to be promiscuous:?

Marsden: I wouldn't consider myself not to be promiscuous.

Fanning: That's an answer you'd expect from a lawyer.

Marsden: Gay people are promiscuous. I accept that, yes.

Fanning: If you have been promiscuous, how do you know you haven't slept with somebody underage?

Marsden: Well firstly it's not my desire, or my emotional or my preferred option, so to that extent I'm pretty certain that no accident would have occurred. But gay people have saunas, gay people have places where they meet. You don't go round and say please produce your birth certificate, etc. etc. But as far as I know I have never, ever slept with someone underage ... Grusovin has pretty heavily damaged my life ... Ron Hicks, an agent for Fisk, has played a very important part in this conspiracy, this criminal conspiracy, this criminal conspiracy, to defame and bring me down.

Fanning: Are you concerned that Deirdre Grusovin may well bring further claims against you?

Marsden: Concerned, no, not concerned because there'll be no basis in them. There's nothing out there on this issue that can do me any damage whatsoever. But, if you say will she try to justify her position, I've got no doubt she will and I've no doubt I'll fight back with every inch and power and determination that is necessary. 

Two weeks later Channel 7 wheeled out three people to refute Marsden's denials.

The Channel 7 exercise was terribly sleazy, with questions to the rent boys like:

Channel 7: "Tell me what happened when you had sex with John Marsden? ... 

What's the worst thing that's ever happened to you in your life?".

Answer: "Meeting John Marsden".

So there you have it. Not guilty of anything in early February, but in late February the door was open to possibilities.

Marsden has commenced proceedings for defamation against Channel 7, but not against Dunbier.

Never go on television to discuss your sex life. 

[Marsden was substantially successful in fis defamation action against Channel 7's programs Today Tonight and Witness. Justice David Levine awarded the plaintiff damages of $525,000. The Court of Appeal ordered a retrial on damages, but the case was settled nefore the hearing.] 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.