Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Taxing times | Main | Ticking all the bruvvers' boxes »
Tuesday
Apr242012

Pensioned mediators

Ex-judges as mediators ... Out of court and back to work ... No worry about the barristers' five year rule ... Issues for the judicial pension scheme and the bar rules 

Richard Rolfe, soon to retire from the NSW Dizzo after 11-and-a-half years of judging, will leave the bench and become a commercial mediator. 

The ranks of ex-judges, who have turned their experience and skills to mediation, are swelling at an impressive rate. 

Apart from the well known High Court, Supreme Court, Federal Court and Court of Appeal bigwigs, we're finding judges from lower down the food chain and from the Family Court joining in the spree. 

Judges can retire on their full pension, hang out their shingles as mediators, and get straight back into it without having to bother with any bar rule that constrains them from practising in their old courts.  

Peter Rose and Stephen O'Ryan, both former judges of the Family Court, are now successfully embedded in the mediation business. 

O'Ryan is back as a member of the bar with rooms at State Chambers, and can do family law work as a mediator that he would not be permitted to do as a barrister for five years after his departure from the bench. 

Rose does not appear listed online as a member of the NSW bar 'n' grill. 

Both he and O'Ryan had been members of 12 Wentworth/Selborne

Rose did 12-and-a-half years and O'Ryan 16-and-a-half years as Family Court judges before turning to mediation. 

Brian Jordan, another Family Court judge, who was appointed in July 1994 and resigned in December 2009, is going strong as a family law mediator in Brisbane. 

There's no shortage of barristerial comment about this trend. Questions are begged about the point of the judicial pension and the effectiveness of bar rules in relevant jurisdictions. 

The pension is supposed to underpin the essence of judicial independence - that judges can do their job without worrying about how to put a bit of fruit on the sideboard after they retire. 

The contemplation of having to drum-up customers for a post-judicial gig should not be a distraction. 

In any event, if they're trousering $5,000 to $10,000 a day as mediators they probably don't need the taxpayer subsidised pension. 

The bar rules in NSW are designed to create a hiatus between being a judge and an advocate in the same court. 

The rule is more about appearances - it's not a great look to be judging one day, and the next back as an advocate appearing before recently farewelled colleagues. 

There's a bit of disgruntlement about the way former judges can collect their pensions and continue to ply their trade, doing quite similar work. 

In the meantime, the Law Society is revising its solicitor mediator fees. The new rates are expected to be "competitive". 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.