Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« ICAC's new commissioner | Main | McLeod's Daughters »
Friday
Jan312014

Regional reports 

Upending free speech in the Top End ... A terrible Christmas time in The Map 

OUR Darwin field agent, Buffalo Bruce, brings us news that the territory's CLP attorney general, former copper John Elferink, has been mightily vexed about an article in the January issue of Balance, the quarterly organ of the NT Law Society. 

Alice Springs legal aid lawyer Russell Goldflam, who is also president of the Criminal Law Association of the Northern Territory, penned an article under the fetching headline, Franz Schlegelberger and the concentration of powers.  

Russell reported on his holiday in Berlin and a visit to the Topographie des Terrors, a bleak museum on the site of the former headquarters of the SS and its neighbours, the Gestapo and the Concentration Camps Inspectorate. 

Goldflam referred to the eminent German jurist Franz Schlegelberger, whose defence at his war crimes trial was that judicial officers were subject to the will of the Supreme Judge i.e. Adolph Schicklgruber, (aka Hitler). 

The war crimes tribunal didn't think much of this argument and, in a warning to all toadying judges, slotted Franz to life imprisonment for crimes against humanity. 

All of this was a roundabout way of getting to the NT's Serious Sex Offenders Act and its design for indefinite preventative detention. 

Goldflam returned to Australia on the very day the NT AG's first application for indefinite detention of a prisoners was refused by the local Supremes. 

AG Elferink wanted to amend the legislation so that the court's decisions are "consistent with government expectations".  

Goldflam reported that this "sent a chill" down his spine. 

His article was vividly illustrated by a photo from the Topographie des Terrors, of a mass of Deutschlanders doing their Nazi salutes, with a lone protester resisting the Heil Hitler routine. 

From the Topographie des Terrors archiveElferink was livid, saying the article associated him with the Nazis - despite the fact the Goldflam went to pains to draw a distinction:  

"Not, I hasten to add, because I am worried that we are sliding towards fascism. I have no doubt that John Elferink is sincerely committed to securing the peace, order and good government of the Northern Territory, and moreover, I accept that his concerns on this specific issue are both clear and proper: the protection of the community, and the protection of the public purse."  

You'd think his carefully constructed work was eminently suitable for an organ called Balance

Elferink: incandescent Top End AG

The AG didn't think so and word got to Goldflam that the first law officer was incandescent with fury. 

Last weekend the lawyer from the Alice published a massive grovel to the thin-skinned attorney.  

"I apologise to the Northern Territory Attorney General, John Elferink, for the offence to him caused by my column published in the January 2014 edition of Balance. Mr Elferink has specifically taken umbrage at the superimposition of the article (which included criticism of a comment he had made) on a photograph depicting a crowd of people delivering the Nazi salute." 

It was an error of judgment, etc. 

Poor wounded Elferink. There is no shortage of glass jaws among pollies notorious for dishing it out in cowards' castle. 

Many top enders in the legal caper are incensed that one of their number felt obliged to eat humble pie. It's an outrage, is the frequent refrain around the watering holes. 

Being on the government payroll, rather than at the independent bar, may have been a deciding factor for the legal aid man - but for lawyers to have to tip-toe around an attorney general's tiresome sensitivities is absurd. 

Elfering issued a statement, saying: 

"I'm grateful to him for his courage in being so forthright in apologising." 

What a prat. 

Read Goldflam's column here

Read his grovel here 

*   *   *

TWO different, but sort-of-related, stories from Van Diemen's Land appeared in the tissues on the same day, in the middle of this month. 

Both are connected to Launceston lawyer Adrian John Hall, 38. 

At 1am on January 14 the The Advocate from the north west coast of the Apple Isle, reported that a legal aid dispute has delayed the trial of Davenport man Adrian Smillie, accused of a Christmas Day killing. 

The Advocate suggested that the Law Society of Tassie was taking legal proceedings against the Legal Aid Commission. 

Apparently, the commission has refused to fund Adrian because the accused had already been granted the services of an in-house legal aid lawyer. 

Food tragic Justice Stephen Estcourt said he would fast track the review to February 3, to be heard by Alan Blow CJ. 

Hall insists he'll do the trial, "even if I have to do it for free". 

That is very generous of him, because he may have some pending legal expenses of his own. 

At 3.41pm on January 14 the ABC News in Launceston posted a story that Hall had pleaded not guilty to three counts of common assault and 24 charges of breaching police family violence orders. 

It related to an alleged Christmas Eve domestic rumble in 2012. 

Hall is accused of grabbing his ex-partner by the neck and pushing her against a wall. 

There is another startling allegation that he also grabbed her by the ankles and pulled her off the toilet. 

The third allegation concerns an assault in the carpark of a Launceston drinking establishment. 

Hall: denies dragging ex-partner from the toilet

Hall denies the assault charges, plus the breach of family violence orders, as he does separate charges that he nicked $17,500 from his former law shop

He was also charged with over-billing a client a brutal $400 in December 2011. 

Just as well the Law Society is saddling-up on his behalf against the keepers of the legal aid purse. 

Looks like The Map is in for an exciting year of reporting. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.