Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Holiday season ... Mother's Day, Lent, Chocolate ... Publisher wants money from Russell Brand for unpublished books ... Paralegal accessed forbidden documents to qualify for legal training contract ... Birthday card payout ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Elements of judicial style | Main | Gonzo greed »
Tuesday
Nov012011

Silver Fox - not so quick

While merging the family law work of the federal courts edges ahead, the new Australian Military Court is missing in action ... The generals don't want federal madges dealing with their brave lads ... Defence Minister Stephen Smith still in cogitation mode ... Polly Peck reports 

Defence Minister Stephen Smith might be being pushed by the bruvvas of the NSW right as a safe pair of hands to take over from Julia, but he has one big problem. He spends most of his time sitting on them.

The man known as the Silver Fox to his lady admirers has got a reputation within government as the Great Procrastinator.

It's something of an irony that the fellow being tagged to block the return to The Lodge of Kevin Rudd is also notorious for sitting on matters for months before making a decision.

Smithy's need to "better understand" his briefs seems  to be part of the reason why legislation to create a new military division of the Federal Court and merge the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court has been missing in action.

Why the future of the Family Court and the FMC should be so linked may not be apparent to many. But your Canberra spy has some insight into the intricacies surrounding this issue.

In 2009, with the court merger proposal rapidly sinking as the Magistrates Liberation Front and George (Soapy) Brandis continued to shell it, the decision by the High Court to declare the Australian Military Court unconstitutional provided a timely life raft.

With the Liberal Party is in no position to block fix-up legislation after it created the mess over the AMC in 2007, it seemed like a smart strategy to bundle the court merger with legislation creating a new military division of the Federal Court.

Nonetheless, defence brass still had issues. They were not keen on outsiders sticking their beaks into military discipline, particularly when it related to actions arising on overseas deployment.

It was eventually agreed that all judicial officers appointed to the new division either have past military experience or a familiarity with the services to "ensure that the new court has the necessary understanding of the requirements and critical nature of military discipline".

The generals were concerned that some loose-cannon of a federal madge would let fly on our brave diggers. (Personally, I believe a bit of robust military discipline wouldn't go amiss at the FMC itself.) 

Smith: keen to understand At least, that arrangement seemed to be fine while Labor senator John Faulkner was defence minister. The legislation was introduced last year before the election.

But with Faulkner now on the back-bench and Smithy taking over the portfolio there appears to have been a change of heart and the legislation has not yet been re-introduced after lapsing at the election. 

When introducing legislation to reinstate the pre-2007 military justice court martial arrangements in May, pending new legislation to establish the military court, Smithy noted more time was needed, "for the consideration and development of options for a new military justice system which meets the requirements of Chapter III of the Constitution".

But head of the Defence Legal team, Mark Cunliffe, gave a bit more insight into what has been holding things up at Senate Estimates the other week. 

"There are a range of issues which have been raised by matters which have occurred or been identified in recent times.

Certainly the issue of the courts martial proceedings in relation to the civilian casualties issue in Afghanistan was one where the minister was keen to understand better some of those matters. I think it is still the case that there are issues which he and the Attorney are discussing in relation to how the model might work." 

In other words, Smithy needs to make sure our troops get a fair shake of the sauce bottle if they accidentally shoot an Afghanistan tribesman in the head while celebrating a local wedding. 

Attorney General Robert McClelland was quoted the other day as saying he intends to introduce legislation for the family courts restructure and judicial complaints handling, "in the current sittings, subject to general legislative programming". 

It may not be safe to assume that the new AMC component of the Federal Court will be ready to roll at the same time. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.