Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Lubyanka ... Bullying investigation into former Federal Court judge goes nowhere ... "Complaint unsubstantiated" ... Phew! ... Recommendations about staff education ... Nothing recommended for judicial induction ... More >> 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Happy birthday Gitmo | Main | Voyager victims fleeced by pirate »
Friday
Dec232011

Slater & Gordon bastes itself in Turner Freeman victory

Slater & Gordon accused of trying to snitch commercial benefit from Turner Freeman's High Court victory in asbestos case ... Angry rebuke ... All a terrible misunderstanding 

Turner Freeman is awfully upset with Slater & Gordon. 

And is it any wonder. 

S & G issued a couple of press releases about the asbestos related case, Booth v Amaca Pty Ltd (one of the James Hardie related companies). 

The most recent release from the publicly listed law shop was on December 14, the day the High Court upheld Booth's claim. 

The court said that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding by the Dust Diseases Tribunal that brake linings containing asbestos, manufactured by the appellant, caused Mr Booth's malignant pleural mesothelioma. 

Straight out of the blocks Slater & Gordon trumpeted to the world: "Landmark High Court win for asbestos victims." 

See Slater & Gordon media release

The only trouble was that Slater & Gordon didn't act for Booth. 

Wade: ring Joanne for further commentThe press release was issued by S & G asbestos partner in Sydney, Joanne Wade, and the firm's PR man Michael Salmon. 

It gave the distinct impression that this was one of Slater & Gordon's triumphs. 

"A landmark decision handed down today by the High Court of Australia has sent the strongest message yet to the manufacturers of automative brake pads that their products have a direct link to the deadly asbestos disease, mesothelioma." 

It went on to describe the history of the Booth case with added commentary about it from Joanne Wade. 

There was also a marketing twist to it, because Wade was quoted in the media release saying: 

"[The High Court] decision will provide a huge amount of relief to the possibly hundreds of mechanics and automotive workers who have contracted or may contract asbestos related diseases repairing brakes over the years." 

All part of an enthusiastic attempt to whistle-up a bit of business. 

Gardiman: lividTurner Freeman partner  and dust diseases guru Armando Gardiman was livid. He wrote to Slater & Gordon accusing the firm of behaviour that was "disgraceful … distasteful ...deceitful [and] completely unjustifiable". 

He had referred S & G's media release to senior counsel seeking advice whether any rules or regulations have been infringed. If so, he would consider sending a complaint to the Legal Services Commissioner. 

Woof, woof. 

"The obvious inference to the uninformed upon reading the release is that you claim credit for the case when it had nothing to do with your firm. 

You misrepresent yourself as having been involved in the conduct of the case when you did not perform a single act concerned with the cause until it had been successfully concluded by the efforts of Turner Freeman." 

There was mention of "drones" and "busy bees". 

John Booth was represented at all times by Gerard McMahon, a partner at Turner Freeman's Newcastle office. 

"For three years Gerard McMahon has devoted much of his professional life to the conduct of this litigation." 

McMahon: carried the Booth caseGardiman claimed that Michael Salmon contacted media organisations  "in order to promote the media release". 

The biting remarks kept coming: 

"Perhaps, now that you are a public company, you have ceased to understand the ethics and the integrity required of legal practitioners." 

You can read Armando's letter here

We approached Michael Salmon for a response. He said Slater & Gordon has a client dealing with the same issues as Mr Booth's litigation, and that "we offer comment on issues affecting our clients". 

Later we heard that Slater & Gordon had written to Turner Freeman apologising for any "misunderstanding". 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.