Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Happy birthday Gitmo | Main | Voyager victims fleeced by pirate »
Friday
Dec232011

Slater & Gordon bastes itself in Turner Freeman victory

Slater & Gordon accused of trying to snitch commercial benefit from Turner Freeman's High Court victory in asbestos case ... Angry rebuke ... All a terrible misunderstanding 

Turner Freeman is awfully upset with Slater & Gordon. 

And is it any wonder. 

S & G issued a couple of press releases about the asbestos related case, Booth v Amaca Pty Ltd (one of the James Hardie related companies). 

The most recent release from the publicly listed law shop was on December 14, the day the High Court upheld Booth's claim. 

The court said that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding by the Dust Diseases Tribunal that brake linings containing asbestos, manufactured by the appellant, caused Mr Booth's malignant pleural mesothelioma. 

Straight out of the blocks Slater & Gordon trumpeted to the world: "Landmark High Court win for asbestos victims." 

See Slater & Gordon media release

The only trouble was that Slater & Gordon didn't act for Booth. 

Wade: ring Joanne for further commentThe press release was issued by S & G asbestos partner in Sydney, Joanne Wade, and the firm's PR man Michael Salmon. 

It gave the distinct impression that this was one of Slater & Gordon's triumphs. 

"A landmark decision handed down today by the High Court of Australia has sent the strongest message yet to the manufacturers of automative brake pads that their products have a direct link to the deadly asbestos disease, mesothelioma." 

It went on to describe the history of the Booth case with added commentary about it from Joanne Wade. 

There was also a marketing twist to it, because Wade was quoted in the media release saying: 

"[The High Court] decision will provide a huge amount of relief to the possibly hundreds of mechanics and automotive workers who have contracted or may contract asbestos related diseases repairing brakes over the years." 

All part of an enthusiastic attempt to whistle-up a bit of business. 

Gardiman: lividTurner Freeman partner  and dust diseases guru Armando Gardiman was livid. He wrote to Slater & Gordon accusing the firm of behaviour that was "disgraceful … distasteful ...deceitful [and] completely unjustifiable". 

He had referred S & G's media release to senior counsel seeking advice whether any rules or regulations have been infringed. If so, he would consider sending a complaint to the Legal Services Commissioner. 

Woof, woof. 

"The obvious inference to the uninformed upon reading the release is that you claim credit for the case when it had nothing to do with your firm. 

You misrepresent yourself as having been involved in the conduct of the case when you did not perform a single act concerned with the cause until it had been successfully concluded by the efforts of Turner Freeman." 

There was mention of "drones" and "busy bees". 

John Booth was represented at all times by Gerard McMahon, a partner at Turner Freeman's Newcastle office. 

"For three years Gerard McMahon has devoted much of his professional life to the conduct of this litigation." 

McMahon: carried the Booth caseGardiman claimed that Michael Salmon contacted media organisations  "in order to promote the media release". 

The biting remarks kept coming: 

"Perhaps, now that you are a public company, you have ceased to understand the ethics and the integrity required of legal practitioners." 

You can read Armando's letter here

We approached Michael Salmon for a response. He said Slater & Gordon has a client dealing with the same issues as Mr Booth's litigation, and that "we offer comment on issues affecting our clients". 

Later we heard that Slater & Gordon had written to Turner Freeman apologising for any "misunderstanding". 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.