Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Enriching the client experience | Main | Nineteenth century man »
Friday
May242013

Smacking of pure arrogance 

QC drafts letter for Allens, which makes "thinly veiled" threat to Vic CJ ... "Grossly improper" attempt to influence the court ... Full throttle grovel 

Warren CJ: court accepts apology for indefensible letter from Allens

A PARTNER and a senior associate of Allens in Melbourne issued a massive grovel to the Vic Supremes over a threatening letter they sent to Chief Justice Earl Warren. 

Allens was acting for Australia Post in a trademarks appeal in the Full Feds. Notable Melbourne QC Rodney Garratt had been hired to saddle-up. 

Unfortunately, Rodney was stuck in the VicSupremes in a commercial case involving parties in love with the letter "X" - Contexx & Nominexx v Austexx & Ors

The case was dragging on and it didn't look at though Justice Jennie Davies was going to adjourn it part-heard so that Rod could pop along to the Full Feds for Allens and the postie. 

Instead of giving thought to whether Garrett's competent junior in the Contexx case could soldier on, Allens sent a missive to Warren CJ saying, in so many words: if we can't have an adjournment we will be reluctant to file further cases in the commercial list of the Supreme Court of Vic. 

Warren was away, but the correspondence soon bounced around the court causing incandescent reactions, with judges choking on their Iced Vo-Vos at morning tea. 

Aileen Ryan SC, herself a former Allens senior associate, appeared before Kim Hargrave (May 13)  on behalf of the two Allens IP gurus - misspelled in the transcript as "Mr Goulder and Mr Glesson". 

"I am instructed, Your Honour, to say that both practitioners unreservedly apologise and sincerely apologise for sending what was, in hindsite, a very inappropriate and indefensible letter to have sent. They realise now the consequences of the actions and are extremely remorseful and happy to make that apology to Your Honour in person, if needs be." 

It turns out that the letter dispatched by the Allens' boys was actually drafted by Garratt (misspelled in the transcript as Garret). 

Aileen dropped Rodney right in it: 

"In the terms of the contents of sending that letter, it's not an excuse but the explanation is that it was drafted by senior counsel, Mr Garratt. He recommended that the advice - that that letter be sent." 

HH said he was "concerned" to hear that piece of news. 

"The letter contains, I think, a thinly veiled threat ...

For solicitors or counsel, senior counsel at that, for a non-party, to endeavour to pressure the Chief Justice to influence the conduct of a trial judge in a part-heard case can have no justification ...

Such conduct smacks of pure arrogance." 

There were further horrors. The Allens' letter had not been sent to the other parties in the part-heard Contexx case. 

HH thought this was, "grossly improper, tantamount to seeking to influence the conduct of a part-heard trial by secret communication with the court".  

HH: "Senior counsel, a partner and a senior associate should know better. I hope you're about to tell me that it was copied to the other parties." 

Ms Ryan: "No, it wasn't your Honour ..."

As it eventually turned out counsel for the other side in the Contexx case were prepared to "accommodate" Rodney, so Justice Davies would not need to sit on the two days he was off in the Full Feds. As Hargrave concluded: 

"So I would say simply, gentlemen, in future exercise your own judgment, as Ms Ryan has frankly acknowledged that you both ought to have done. 

Mr Garratt, perhaps given the very difficult position in which he was placed, wasn't placed to give you objective advice about this and although understandable that you've adopted correspondence he has drafted, I'm fortified to hear that you appreciate it was not justifiable … I, of course, accept the apology which has been given." 

Phew!

Read transcript

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.