SEARCH
Justinian News

Lehrmann v The Commonwealth and Corruption Concealment Commission ... Here's Brucie's Originating Application seeking legai aid funding for the investigation into "frivolous, 'James Bond' like allegations that the Applicant used 'official' information (being French submarine secrets) gathered on the night of 26 March 2019 for financial, professional and personal purposes, among other things ... More >> 

Politics Media Law Society

My Role in Gough's Downfall ... Reporter-at-Large … Scoops that flushed out the deceit behind the Dismissal … Big anniversary chinwag in Canberra on November 11 … The combined forces of Kerr, Ellicott and cousin Garfield … Constitutional manipulation … Maurice Byers to the rescue ... Read more >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Know one, purl one ... Iron Lady of legal rectitude endorses Gageler ... The chief justice wants judges on the straight and narrow ... The cardboard cutout model of legislative supremacy ... The evils of judicial activism ... Procrustes on the dance floor with the Legislative-Judicial Foxtrot ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


AI at work ... The Epstein Files ... What a resurrected Christopher Hitchens says about Trump and Epstein ... Video >> 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Berlusconi's dream world ... Revenge politics in Italy ... Independence of prosecutors under attack ... Constitutional assault ... The years of lead ... Investigations reopened into old murders ... High drama at Milan's Leoncavallo ... Rome correspondent Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

"If we’re only picking people who have got completely lily-white records then we’ll be missing out on a lot of people that can contribute to public life.

NSW Premier Chris Minns, endorsing Mal Lanyon, his pick for Police Commissioner, whose contributions to public life include shouting drunken obsenities at a paramedic who came to his aid, and commandeering a police launch for private entertainment on New Year's eve ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Schmoozing and betrayal ... Judge Water Softener rides into Integrityville mounted high on his horse ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... Intriguing submissions ... Unprecedented assistance to morals monitor ... The scale of the sub-rosa intrigue ... Plenty to think about ... Ginger Snatch reports ... Read more >> 

Justinian's archive

News Desk Special ... Angelic death notices from the bar ... Soapy slips on FOI changes ... Unusual interlocutory costs order for Chris Dale ... Judge ticks off Abbott in letters' page ... Knock About's festive salute to the coppers ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Enriching the client experience | Main | Nineteenth century man »
Friday
May242013

Smacking of pure arrogance 

QC drafts letter for Allens, which makes "thinly veiled" threat to Vic CJ ... "Grossly improper" attempt to influence the court ... Full throttle grovel 

Warren CJ: court accepts apology for indefensible letter from Allens

A PARTNER and a senior associate of Allens in Melbourne issued a massive grovel to the Vic Supremes over a threatening letter they sent to Chief Justice Earl Warren. 

Allens was acting for Australia Post in a trademarks appeal in the Full Feds. Notable Melbourne QC Rodney Garratt had been hired to saddle-up. 

Unfortunately, Rodney was stuck in the VicSupremes in a commercial case involving parties in love with the letter "X" - Contexx & Nominexx v Austexx & Ors

The case was dragging on and it didn't look at though Justice Jennie Davies was going to adjourn it part-heard so that Rod could pop along to the Full Feds for Allens and the postie. 

Instead of giving thought to whether Garrett's competent junior in the Contexx case could soldier on, Allens sent a missive to Warren CJ saying, in so many words: if we can't have an adjournment we will be reluctant to file further cases in the commercial list of the Supreme Court of Vic. 

Warren was away, but the correspondence soon bounced around the court causing incandescent reactions, with judges choking on their Iced Vo-Vos at morning tea. 

Aileen Ryan SC, herself a former Allens senior associate, appeared before Kim Hargrave (May 13)  on behalf of the two Allens IP gurus - misspelled in the transcript as "Mr Goulder and Mr Glesson". 

"I am instructed, Your Honour, to say that both practitioners unreservedly apologise and sincerely apologise for sending what was, in hindsite, a very inappropriate and indefensible letter to have sent. They realise now the consequences of the actions and are extremely remorseful and happy to make that apology to Your Honour in person, if needs be." 

It turns out that the letter dispatched by the Allens' boys was actually drafted by Garratt (misspelled in the transcript as Garret). 

Aileen dropped Rodney right in it: 

"In the terms of the contents of sending that letter, it's not an excuse but the explanation is that it was drafted by senior counsel, Mr Garratt. He recommended that the advice - that that letter be sent." 

HH said he was "concerned" to hear that piece of news. 

"The letter contains, I think, a thinly veiled threat ...

For solicitors or counsel, senior counsel at that, for a non-party, to endeavour to pressure the Chief Justice to influence the conduct of a trial judge in a part-heard case can have no justification ...

Such conduct smacks of pure arrogance." 

There were further horrors. The Allens' letter had not been sent to the other parties in the part-heard Contexx case. 

HH thought this was, "grossly improper, tantamount to seeking to influence the conduct of a part-heard trial by secret communication with the court".  

HH: "Senior counsel, a partner and a senior associate should know better. I hope you're about to tell me that it was copied to the other parties." 

Ms Ryan: "No, it wasn't your Honour ..."

As it eventually turned out counsel for the other side in the Contexx case were prepared to "accommodate" Rodney, so Justice Davies would not need to sit on the two days he was off in the Full Feds. As Hargrave concluded: 

"So I would say simply, gentlemen, in future exercise your own judgment, as Ms Ryan has frankly acknowledged that you both ought to have done. 

Mr Garratt, perhaps given the very difficult position in which he was placed, wasn't placed to give you objective advice about this and although understandable that you've adopted correspondence he has drafted, I'm fortified to hear that you appreciate it was not justifiable … I, of course, accept the apology which has been given." 

Phew!

Read transcript

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.