SEARCH
Justinian News

Time's Up for Naughty Nathan ... Recommendation that horrible NSW solicitor be derolled ... Misuse of online funding campaigns ... Spraying ripe and abusive language ... Trolling Robert Beech-Jones ... So unfit and improper as to be beyond reeducation ... Anthony Kanaan reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society

Perils of the Defamatorium ... Lovely Linda Reynolds’ “victory” leaves her underwater … Politics, sex, law, and money … Injuries galore … The art of Tottling … Where’s the serious harm? … Trust me … Jurisdictional backwater ... Read more >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Act of gracelessness ... Kathleen Folbigg's miserable ex gratia payout ... Comparable awards in other miscarriage cases ... Weasel words from the NSW Premier ... Need for a proper system of compensation assessment ... Procrustes in a lather ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I actually never saw the President in any type of massage setting. I never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way. The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects ... Trump was always very cordial and very kind to me. And I just want to say that I find, I admire his extraordinary achievement in becoming the president now."

Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell interviewed by Trump's former lawyer Todd Blanche, now Deputy Attorney General ... July 25, 2025. Interviews released by DOJ, August 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Schmoozing and Betrayal ... Judge Water Softener rides into Integrityville mounted high on his horse ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... Unprecedented assistance to morals monitor ... Plenty to think about ... Court reporter Ginger Snatch files ... Read more >> 

 

 

Justinian's archive

The Tamil Times ... The corruption wars ... Blitzkrieg from The Australian's legal affairs man ... Campaigns to sink ICAC and 18C ... Battles lost in the trenches ... Where are they now? ... Extravagant fulminations ... From Justinian's Archive, April 8, 2017 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Judicial spin | Main | Atanaskovic wins over-wrought billings battle »
Friday
Mar262010

The $6 million magistrate

Junior Junior believes that his cases stand or fall depending who’s on the bench … It’s a difficult concept for clients to comprehend … If only the DNA of some of these beaks could be manipulated … A bit less grump … A bit more fairness.

The conversation usually goes something like this:

Junior: “So, I’ve got this contested hearing tomorrow.”

Barrister (with whom Junior is sharing chambers): “Do you know who you’ve got?”

Junior: “Magistrate (insert name here).”

Barrister: (Uncomfortable silence.) “Ouch, bad draw.”

Whatever happened to justice being blind?

Anyone at the bar will tell you that the eventual outcome of a matter will depend as much, if not solely, on who hears it. Not necessarily the quality or otherwise of the advocate, not the facts, not even necessarily the evidence, but the person in the big chair.

Try explaining that to someone you’re acting for.

Try telling them that if they walk through the doors and see the smiling face of Her Honour Magistrate X, there’s every chance that they’re not walking back out the same door.

However, if it’s His Honour Magistrate Y who greets them in the morning, the likelihood is that a community based order and a stern lecture is on the way.

I realise this is why the good Lord invented de novo appeals from the magistrate’s court – but that’s hardly the point.

If it was me, I’d like to think that my matter would be judged on its merits alone, not the peculiar whims or fancy or prejudice or predilection of the randomly allocated person hearing it.

Perhaps I’m showing my naïveté.

Sometimes as I sit in the back of the court waiting to be called watching person after person, with charges and backgrounds and excuses similar to those I’m about to articulate on my client’s behalf, receiving sentences usually reserved for underworld figures or terrorist sympathisers, I shudder and wonder how much better things would be if I could select my own beak.

Everyone has a favourite magistrate, even they are never perfect.

Just contemplate how life would be improved if you could build-a-better-bench.

Take a little bit from here, a little bit from there and create your own ideal magistrate.

Such a creature can be constructed. We have the technology.

Obviously this would be different for everyone. Those who lean towards the persecution side of things might like to use for their skeleton His Honour deputy sergeant (name removed for obvious reasons) from Geelong.

Add a sprinkling of “drug addiction is a lifestyle choice” and “punishment is the key focus of sentencing” and you should have your perfect prosecutor’s bench.

Likewise, your defence counsel types might like to start with some lefty who buys into that whole ethos of addressing the cause of the offending, rather than punishing the offence itself.

Take a large dose of faith in the redeemable nature of those who frequent the magistrate’s courts and a willingness to find “exceptional circumstances” in the most curious of places and you should be off and running.

You might add an infrared enabled bionic eye and the ability to run at speeds up to, and including, 60 mph – but personally I’d settle for a sunny demeanour and a bit of consistency.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.