Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Triumph in the tropics | Main | Heydon, Albrechtsen and Meagher »
Friday
Apr112003

Tubby's in the firing line

It's a wheeze on the High Court ... Bon mots fly thick and fast from droll judicial wags ... Well, there were two in two days ... From Justinian's archive of transcribed morsels 

Gleeson: forefront of japesThe dry sticks of the High Court have recently cast off their glumness and are having a riot of a time. In particular, Smiler Gleeson, who not all that long ago lectured against witticisms in the court, is at the forefront of the japes:

Gillard v The Queen

Transcript of proceedings, Tuesday April 1, 2003

Kirby J: He did see Mr Preston leave with a gun?

D. Peek QC (for the appellant): I have to come to that. Your Honour, I wonder if I can come to that in the course of the submissions because that is a not unimportant aspect, but can I say just now in direct answer to your Honour, that was a matter that was postulated by the prosecution but the accused, Gillard, in fact said to the police he did not see a gun.

Kirby: How big was the gun?

Peek: We have it in court and I was going to actually give a very brief demonstration of the cocking procedure later. Would it suffice if your Honour looked at it at that time rather than now?

Kirby: Is it a big gun or a pistol?

Peek: It is a pistol, I am sorry, your Honour. It is a Luger pistol and not a particularly big pistol. It is an automatic pistol, or a semi-automatic to be quite precise, rather than a bulky revolving cylinder pistol.

Gleeson CJ: If you are going to point it at us would you mind pointing it in the direction of Justice Callinan?

Peek: I see.

Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd

Transcript of proceedings, Wednesday April 2, 2003

The next day the court was hearing an appeal in a defamation case, concerning qualified privilege and the reciprocity of a publisher’s duty and a reader’s interest:

R. McColl SC (for the appellant): The duty which is the 'common convenience and welfare of society' to which regard is had in determining whether a qualified privilege duty arises is one which is imposed by society, namely, what would right-thinking people regard as whether or not there was a duty, not ...

Gummow J: How do we find these creatures?

McColl: Well, they are the reasonable people who inhabit the streets of Phillip Street and George Street.

Gummow: Mrs Thatcher said there was no such thing as society, and she had a point. She said there is no such thing as society.

Callinan J: Only families, I think.

Gummow: These just get repeated.

Gleeson CJ: Well, 'right-thinking people' means people like me.

McColl: I have no doubt your Honour is a right-thinking member of society.

Bashford's appeal was unsuccessful

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.