Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Potty Mouth Solicitor Dispatched ... NSW Court of Appeal takes dim view of solicitor who laced his correspondence with disrespectful insults ... Insufficiently professional ... Arrived from Greece with only his underpants ... No contrition ... Anthony Kanaan files ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Suing for defamation - it's such a good idea ...Federal Court of Australia ... Sydney barrister loses bid for extension of time to bring appeal over decision allowing Giles George to intervene to seek an equitable lien over costs ... Falling out between barrister and firm after successful defamation action ... No error or procedural unfairness ... From Stephen Murray at the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Major victory for the media as public interest defence established in large and lengthy defamation case brought by orthopaedic surgeon ... Al Muderis v Nine Network, Fairfax and The Age ... Good journalism wins the day ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I've stopped six wars in the last - I'm averaging about a war a month. But the last three were very close together. India and Pakistan, and a lot of them. Congo was just and Rwanda was just done, but you probably know I won't go into it very much, because I don't know the final numbers yet. I don't know. Numerous people were killed, and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years, intermittently, and we solved that war. You probably saw it just came out over the wire, so we solved it ..."

President Donald Trump at a meeting in Scotland with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer ... July 28, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Home Duties ... The dumping of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus ... Behind the scenes ... Bastardry among the brothers ... Unfinished business ... Family law, privacy ... Considerable policy and legislative results ... Here's Michelle Rowland as AG ... What are her priors? ... Polly Peck reports from the Gallery ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Abolish silks ... Sydney SC writes to the editor calling for abolition of the silk system ... Appointments are anachronistic ... It's not a matter of ability, only notability ... Secret blackballing ... "Corrupt" process ... Confessions from an insider who played the game ... From Justinian's Archive, October 24, 2002 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Courtside notebook | Main | Heart of the bar »
Friday
Sep122014

Vic's Lawn Order agenda

Victoria in election mode as government seeks to shift sentencing away from the judges ... NSW's mandatory sentencing plans remain in parliamentary deadlock ... Sex offenders registration unworkable ... Liberty Victoria on the case ... Kevin Childs reports 

Ho, ho, it's election time at Yarraside, and the bare-knuckles campaign is off to a flying start. 

The flaccid Naphthaline government is rushing to secure our safety with some typical rights-reducing proposals. 

Barristers, and others working overtime for nothing, have pinpointed the shortcomings and regressive qualities of the government's Lawn Order package. 

The Sentencing Amendment (Emergency Workers) Bill 2014 introduces mandatory immediate imprisonment and mandatory minimum non-parole periods for some offences against emergency workers on duty - for intentionally or recklessly causing serious injury in circumstances of gross violence. 

See: Liberty Victoria commentary  

See: Sentencing Amendment (Emergency Workers) Bill 2014

This covers police, ambulance officers, fire brigades and country fire brigades, and emergency services workers. Sadly surf life-savers are not on the list, which was the case at one stage with a similar proposal in NSW. 

Mandatory minimum non-parole periods for offences under the legislation range from two to five years. The legislation also imposes a minimum prison sentence of six months for otherwise intentionally or recklessly causing injury, s.18 Vic's Crimes Act

The emergency workers sentencing Bill will: 

• Prevent judicial officers from exercising leniency in cases that do not fit within one of the prescribed "special reasons" (such where an offender without a criminal history may act out of character and/or when drug affected, and is otherwise a law-abiding citizen in gainful employment, and a provider for a family);

• Provide a disincentive for offenders to plead guilty (and also provide an incentive for offenders to appeal). Liberty Vic says this would put further pressure on already stretched courts; 

• Further crowd the full to overflowing jails; and

• Switch key decision making from the judiciary to the executive and thereby instil a system of personality driven decision making.

Mandatory and baseline sentencing is  also part and parcel of the Crimes Amendment (Gross Violence Offences) Act 2013, the Sentencing Amendment (Baseline Sentences) Act 2014 and the Sentencing Amendment (Coward's Punch Manslaughter and Other Matters) Bill 2014.

The Victorian one punch measures set a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years where the offender knew the victim was not expecting to be punched and died as a result of being struck. 

Mandatory minimums are also proposed in manslaughter cases involving "gross violence".

Liberty says this legislation represents a radical transfer of criminal justice functions from the judiciary to the legislature.

Former NSW Director of Public Prosecutions Nicholas Cowdery QC has been vocal on the evils of mandatory sentencing in the issues in the context of NSW "one-punch" laws. 

In NSW the government backed away from mandatory sentences for less serious offences. However, legislation for mandatory minimums for alcohol fuelled violence have not passed the Legislative Council. The Crimes (Amendment) Intoxication Bill is still sitting in orders of the day and not going anywhere. 

Basically, the Legislative Council made some amendments, which the Legislative Assembly refused to pass and then the LC refused to pass the unamended Bill. 

See: Crimes (Amendment) Intoxication Bill 2014

See: Legislative Council debate 

See: Upper House vote jeapordises new NSW mandatory sentencing law 

Liberty Vic makes a couple of points: There are other ways to ensure that sentencing standards reflect community values, such as guideline judgments and/or crown appeals. Also, when the public is fully informed of relevant sentencing facts, the research confirms that sentencing standards of judicial officers are not out of step with the community. 

See: Public judgment on sentencing: Final results from the Tasmanian Jury Sentencing Study 

The Victorian Court of Appeal has an important role in ensuring that sentencing practices meet community standards. It has found some sentences inadequate, and in Winch v The Queen lifted the tariff in cases of glassings. 

There was also a significant effect as a result of increasing the sentence in a case of confrontational aggravated burglary in Hogarth v The Queen

*   *   *

Supervised contact with children still must be reported to the sex offenders register

The Sex Offenders Registration Amendment Bill 2014 also presents concerns. 

See: Sex Offenders Registration Amendment Bill 2014

See: Liberty Victoria response 

The Sex Offenders Registry would further move from being a database to help crime prevention to becoming a responsive form of data collection. 

"The Registry becomes a vast 'warehouse' of information that may be used after a crime has been committed to help a prosecution, rather than providing a targeted and refined database of information that can be used to protect the community and prevent crimes from being committed in the first place." 

The Victorian Law Reform Commission report on Sex Offenders Registration estimates that there will be 10,000 registrants by 2020.  

In addition to other personal details that have to be reported by registrants, and then updated if changed, the legislation requires registrants to report any form of contact or oral or written communication with a child that has the "purpose of forming a personal relationship with the child", even in circumstances of supervised contact. 

To comply, a registrant who may have had dinner at a friend's home and has spoken with his friend's child at the dinner table, with parents present, would need to report this to the register within a day.

Liberty wants judicial discretion as to whether offenders are placed on the register in the first place. 

"The problem with mandatory registration as it stands is that offenders with very low risks of re-offending must be placed on the register."

The Bill also allows information to be passed from police to the community if a registrant may have contact with children. 

"While appreciating the need for disclosure in some circumstances, there is no control in the Bill as to how this information can be disseminated further. 

Liberty is concerned about the possibility of vigilante conduct and the public 'naming and shaming' of persons on the register, that may well be stigmatising and damage rehabilitation to persons who would otherwise be very unlikely to reoffend."

Astonishingly, an offender put on the registry for an offence of indecent assault against an adult, with no link to any child offending or acts of paedophilia, will be banned from child-related employment, forced to advise the register of any clubs or organisations with child-related activities or membership (this includes a library), and notify the registry of any contact with a child in day-to-day life (whether in public and supervised or not). 

Liberty says this is unworkable and diminishes the value of the register. It gives police the power to breach registrants who may find it very difficult to comply with all the requirements, which is itself a serious criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. 

There should be a right to review placement on the register (other than a judicial review which is a very narrow form of review in cases of jurisdictional error and in a costs jurisdiction). 

The Bill only allows the Supreme Court to review people who are registered for life, after 15 years. 

The Bill allows the Chief Commissioners to "suspend" someone from the register for up to 12 months, but it is difficult to see how this would happen.

Liberty calls for a proper means of merits review, specially for registrants who may be suitable for child-related employment, where an offence had nothing to do with children.

"There should be merits review of placement on the register, possibly after two to three years or if there are new facts and/or circumstances. That would help ensure that the register is comprised of people who do constitute a real risk to the sexual safety of the community." 

This is all about politics and pre-election Lawn Order grandstanding and has little to do with ensuring criminal justice functions effectively. 

See: Liberty Victoria's statement

See: Vic bar's statement 

See: ABA's statement

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.