Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Splitting heirs ... How to get rid of the Royals – a Republican tours Orstraya … Underneath their robes – sexual harassment on the bench … Credit card fees – so tricky that only economists know what to do … Muted response to Drumgold vindication … Vale Percy Allan ... Read on ... 

The Financial Times examines criminal trial delays in England & Wales ... About 70,000 cases on waiting lists at Crown Courts ... More >>

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Online incitements ... Riots in English cities fed by online misinformation about refugees ... Policing and prosecution policies ... Fast and furious processing of offenders ... Online Safety Act grapples with new challenges ... Increased policing of speech on tech platforms ... Hugh Vuillier reports from London ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Rules of Engagement | Main | Lawmen in popular culture »
Thursday
Oct282010

Barristerial schtick

Behind the scenes Tippy and the other 'staves devote a healthy amount of time to eviscerating barristerial performances ... It also occurs to her that she may be the subject of scathing dinner table analysis 

As I am wont to tell my hangers-on, weeks can pass within the walls of this bunker in downtown Sydney with only the most trifling of amusements to keep one on the livelier side of the consciousness line.

As I am also apt to say, these are by far the most enjoyable of life's diversions.

Over the past nine-odd months, Gus and I have channelled a vast deal of our surplus energies - that is, those snatches of time not devoted to pillorying Plastic Man - into watching the routines of the learned advocates that sweep into Our Courtrooms.

"Mr X QC has said Farah and Say-Dee 12 times in seven-and-a-half minutes," Gus marvels at the morning tea adjournment, referring to that deliciously nasty High Court case dotted with superior smack-downs to the court below.

"Mr Y - you know, the one who looks like Gollum from The Lord of the Rings - keeps on making that smacking noise with his lips," I say, scooping coffee into the plunger.

"Ooh, I hate it when he does that," Gus shudders. "I told you we had him for a five-day trial and I could hear that moist smack-smack-smack sound in my sleep.

"I think it's the dentures that do it."

Ah, but we love barristers.

Curmudgeons, young guns akin to undergraduate mooters, dab old hands, smooth-larynxed operators, embittered veterans who should settle down into fractious retirement with their fashionable wives on the harbour.

My favourite is a young woman who, in the throes of argument, crinkles her nose like a rabbit.

Barristerial turns of phrase have wormed into our vernacular like a compelling Bret Walker SC argument: we wouldn't put an assertion "quite so high"; our trials and tribulations in matters romantic may be compared "mutatis mutandis"; my compulsion to write (badly) is made grand by labelling it a "cacoethes scribendi".

Gus and I shall never tire of watching the endless permutations of barristerial schtick.

If we could spread out their dear black-caped wings and paste our favourite specimens into scrapbooks, like butterflies, we would.

On occasion, I try to extract judicial thoughts on the bumbling advocates before us, but HH is ever the professional.

Judge will similarly try, when I enter the lair of chambers, to draw me into robust discussions of the law.

But my well of respect for HH runs too deep to sport with the Judicial IQ by offering ill-informed musings on such weighty topics.

So we have, by now, a well-choreographed routine of our own.

I enter chambers with a research note, lunch, coffee, or all three; we pretend these routine exchanges are not timed to the second but welcome, spur-of-the-moment offerings; I wave away any expressions of gratitude; we make a fist of conversation - I on matters trivial, HH on matters meaty; an uncomfortably long pause of one-sided incomprehension hangs in the air; I scuttle away backwards, hit a trolley I parked badly, and tell Gus that Judge has another anecdote of Tippy Stupidity for the familial dinner table.

I do imagine Judge's conversations of an evening en famille.

In my mind's eye, HH is holding court with a glass of pinot noir, red-faced with suppressed laughter, saying ...

"And THEN, Tippy said, 'Judge, why can't a plaintiff receive common law damages for an equitable cause of action'?"

Hearty guffaws sound all round, from a spotty adolescent son to the impeccably coiffed, clever judicial spouse.

I imagine a variation of this Tippy-inspired mirth around The Associate's familial table, or with a gaggle of colleagues in the chambers kitchen.

She tolerates my stupidity with an air of amused benevolence teetering on affection these days, and for this I love her without restraint.

But I can hear her accounts of my botched errands yet:

"And THEN, Tippy said, 'Can I put the Wedgewood in the dishwasher'?"

You can imagine the rest.

I cannot bear to think of leaving this place.

I am not ready for the world, and it is not ready for me.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.