Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... Latest from the trouble prone Queensland branch of the Federales ... Administrative law upsets ... Sandy Street overturned ... On the level in Canberra ... Missing aged care accountant ... Law shop managing director skewered ... Ginger Snatch reports from courtrooms around the nation ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


A Christmas card from 500 Words ... It's Christmas – time to consider Trump, Lehrmann, and Dutton's connections to the word "rape" … It's not Christmas without Lady Mary Fairfax … US Ambassador to Australia – looking for someone from the "diplomatic clown car" ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's Hitlerish ... Reelection of a charlatan ... Republicans take popular vote for the first time in 20 years ... Amnesia ... Trashing a democracy ... Trump and his team of troubled men ... Mainstream media wilts in the eye of the storm ... Depravity, greed and revenge are the new normal ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Shmagatha Shmistie 2.0 ... Another round with Vardy and Rooney ... Remote evidence from a witness - on the bus ... Brazilian magistrate looses his shirt ... CV qualifications propped up by pork pies ... Fast justice by Scissors & Paste ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt in London with the latest regrettable court-related conduct ... Read more >> 

"Today is about Dad's wishes and confirming all of our support for him and for his wishes. It shouldn't be difficult or controversial. Love you, Lachlan."   

Lachlan Murdoch's text message to his sister Elisabeth on the eve of a special meeting to discuss altering the family trust so that Lachlan would run and control News Corp and Fox News ... Quoted in the opinion of the Nevada Probate Commissioner who ruled against changing the terms of the trust ... The New York Times, December 9, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The great interceptor ... Rugby League ... Dennis Tutty and the try he shouldn't have scored ... Case that changed the face of professional sport ... Growth of the player associations, courtesy of the Barwick High Court ... Free kick ... Restraint of trade ... Braham Dabscheck comments ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Litigation's artful delays ... From Justinian's archive ... April 22, 2014 ... Lawyers and the complexity of litigation ... Delay as a defence tactic ... Access to justice includes preventing access to justice ... Reprising the Flower & Hart saga with starring role by Ian Callinan QC ... Abuse of process ... Queensland CJ declined to intervene ... Tulkinghorn on the case  ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Rules of Engagement | Main | Lawmen in popular culture »
Thursday
Oct282010

Barristerial schtick

Behind the scenes Tippy and the other 'staves devote a healthy amount of time to eviscerating barristerial performances ... It also occurs to her that she may be the subject of scathing dinner table analysis 

As I am wont to tell my hangers-on, weeks can pass within the walls of this bunker in downtown Sydney with only the most trifling of amusements to keep one on the livelier side of the consciousness line.

As I am also apt to say, these are by far the most enjoyable of life's diversions.

Over the past nine-odd months, Gus and I have channelled a vast deal of our surplus energies - that is, those snatches of time not devoted to pillorying Plastic Man - into watching the routines of the learned advocates that sweep into Our Courtrooms.

"Mr X QC has said Farah and Say-Dee 12 times in seven-and-a-half minutes," Gus marvels at the morning tea adjournment, referring to that deliciously nasty High Court case dotted with superior smack-downs to the court below.

"Mr Y - you know, the one who looks like Gollum from The Lord of the Rings - keeps on making that smacking noise with his lips," I say, scooping coffee into the plunger.

"Ooh, I hate it when he does that," Gus shudders. "I told you we had him for a five-day trial and I could hear that moist smack-smack-smack sound in my sleep.

"I think it's the dentures that do it."

Ah, but we love barristers.

Curmudgeons, young guns akin to undergraduate mooters, dab old hands, smooth-larynxed operators, embittered veterans who should settle down into fractious retirement with their fashionable wives on the harbour.

My favourite is a young woman who, in the throes of argument, crinkles her nose like a rabbit.

Barristerial turns of phrase have wormed into our vernacular like a compelling Bret Walker SC argument: we wouldn't put an assertion "quite so high"; our trials and tribulations in matters romantic may be compared "mutatis mutandis"; my compulsion to write (badly) is made grand by labelling it a "cacoethes scribendi".

Gus and I shall never tire of watching the endless permutations of barristerial schtick.

If we could spread out their dear black-caped wings and paste our favourite specimens into scrapbooks, like butterflies, we would.

On occasion, I try to extract judicial thoughts on the bumbling advocates before us, but HH is ever the professional.

Judge will similarly try, when I enter the lair of chambers, to draw me into robust discussions of the law.

But my well of respect for HH runs too deep to sport with the Judicial IQ by offering ill-informed musings on such weighty topics.

So we have, by now, a well-choreographed routine of our own.

I enter chambers with a research note, lunch, coffee, or all three; we pretend these routine exchanges are not timed to the second but welcome, spur-of-the-moment offerings; I wave away any expressions of gratitude; we make a fist of conversation - I on matters trivial, HH on matters meaty; an uncomfortably long pause of one-sided incomprehension hangs in the air; I scuttle away backwards, hit a trolley I parked badly, and tell Gus that Judge has another anecdote of Tippy Stupidity for the familial dinner table.

I do imagine Judge's conversations of an evening en famille.

In my mind's eye, HH is holding court with a glass of pinot noir, red-faced with suppressed laughter, saying ...

"And THEN, Tippy said, 'Judge, why can't a plaintiff receive common law damages for an equitable cause of action'?"

Hearty guffaws sound all round, from a spotty adolescent son to the impeccably coiffed, clever judicial spouse.

I imagine a variation of this Tippy-inspired mirth around The Associate's familial table, or with a gaggle of colleagues in the chambers kitchen.

She tolerates my stupidity with an air of amused benevolence teetering on affection these days, and for this I love her without restraint.

But I can hear her accounts of my botched errands yet:

"And THEN, Tippy said, 'Can I put the Wedgewood in the dishwasher'?"

You can imagine the rest.

I cannot bear to think of leaving this place.

I am not ready for the world, and it is not ready for me.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.