Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

The eagle cracked

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"One wonders whether a murderer who later contributes to society might be treated better that Heydon has been." 

Janet Albrechtsen in The Australian seeking the resurrection of former justice Dyson Heydon whose sexual predations ruined the legal careers of young women associates at the High Court ... April 11, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Premier Newman misleading parliament | Main | Trashing Fitzgerald's legacy »
Wednesday
Dec042013

Bowen Hills Bugle asleep on the job 

Was the Crime and Misconduct Commission recruited to write puff pieces in support of the bikie legislation? ... Questions the Courier-Mail should be asking ... Conflict of evidence still unresolved ... Stephen Keim and Alex McKean press ahead 

David Gibson: now in charge of the parliamentary ethics committee

An opinion piece from the Courier-Mail's state political writer suggests that Labor's past history of undermining the parliamentary committee system gives it no standing to complain about the LNP's treatment of those committees.  

This may be true, but it simply misses the point. 

The article claims that the unprecedented move by the government to sack the entire Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee, "will hardly register with voters who view any committee for politicians as a recipe for inertia conducted at their expense".  

If this is correct, then the Courier-Mail, itself, must share some of the responsibility for failing to discharge its obligations as a member of the fourth estate. In particular, one expects the press to ask the truly important questions about the Levy affair which led to the sacking of the PCMC. 

See: Trashing Fitzgerald's legacy 

The questions are simple. What is curious is that the major daily newspaper in the state, which played an instrumental role in bringing about the Fitzgerald Inquiry, has failed to ask them.

For example:

1. What is the explanation for the inconsistencies between the evidence given by acting head of the Crime and Misconduct Commission, Dr Ken Levy and government PR man Lee Anderson to the PCMC, specifically about:

  • the number of times there was contact between them prior to the publication of Levy's opinion piece;
  • whether Anderson suggested that journalist Des Houghton should conduct the interview with Levy;
  • Anderson making initial contact with Mr. Houghton to discuss the proposed interview;
  • Levy having had a face-to-face meeting with Anderson, in the Premier's office, a few days before the article was published and; 
  • Anderson seeking to provide input into what the article would and would not discuss?

2. If Mr. Anderson is telling the truth about these matters, isn't it clear that Levy has failed to be full and frank in his disclosure to the PCMC, on both occasions when he has given evidence before it, and in his efforts to correct the record?

3. How can those repeated failures to give full and frank disclosure be anything short of an attempt to mislead the PCMC?

4. If Levy has, somehow, forgotten a meeting in the Premier's office a few days before publishing an opinion piece, is he fit to head the CMC?

5. If Dr. Levy is so lacking in judgment as to think the meeting with Anderson in the Premier's officer was not contact with "someone from government", is he fit to head the CMC?

6. Where it appears that either: (a) Anderson has misled the PCMC, (b) Levy has misled the PCMC, or (c) Levy is incompetent, how can the public have confidence in Levy to remain as head of the CMC until these issues have been resolved?

These questions have not been put to the government.

Instead, the government's ploy of accusations of bias against the formerly constituted PCMC have been allowed to muddy the waters. It is tolerably clear that the PCMC was sacked simply so these questions could not be asked by the PCMC, itself.

The documents showing the inconsistencies between the evidence of Anderson and Levy have been available on the public record for more than 10 days. This is sufficient time for a competent news organ to seek answers to the relevant questions. 

*   *   *

THE government has now referred further investigation of Dr Levy to the select ethics committee, chaired by David Gibson, the LNP member for Gympie.

Gibson was forced to resign as Police Minister, two weeks after being appointed, when he was caught speeding while his licence was suspended.

He subsequently owned-up to a history of traffic offences going back 10 years, which had not previously been disclosed.

Gibson is a former army officer, as is Premier Newman and Brigadier Bill Mellor, who the Premier is said to have appointed to implement an "across government" response to bikies.

Gibson is also a former manager of the Gympie Times. When confronted about his offending, he said he could not recall receiving the correspondence informing him his licence had been suspended, and had been unaware he was driving without a valid licence.

In light of the importance of public confidence in the CMC, the select ethics committee should hold its hearings in public with transcripts of proceedings available to the public. 

These questions are too important for proceedings to take place behind closed doors, where the LNP majority can seek to head-off any embarrassment to the government. 

Alex McKean & Stephen Keim SC

McKean and Keim practise as counsel in south-east Queensland.

See: Trashing Fitzgerald's legacy 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.