Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Holding onto Hope: Gina Rinehart's Bleak House ... Seeking chunks of the huge iron ore pit, Hope Downs ... Tracing the tangled Wright, Hancock, Rinehart litigation ... Allegations of fraud against the family trust ... Manouvering ... Tax "advice" ... Shifting vesting date ... Money, the root of unhappiness ... Anthony-James Kanaan reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Pastoral care ... Election free content … Cardinal sins … The Pope leaves behind the wreckage of his predatory priests … The law keeps victims in check … Litigation loopholes … Latest cases … Catholic Church’s battle to keep the money ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

"Invasion" of the United States ...Trump deportations ... Detention in gulags ... How much of an enemy does an alien have to be? ... Trump judge turns the tables ... Bush's war on terror shows the way ... Forum shopping for habeas cases ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian is taking a break during May ... Normal operations will recommence in June ... 

Justinian's Bloggers

Conclave Part 2: Return of the Prodigal ... Vatican fraudster returns ... And departs ... Another struck-off Cardinal re-emerges ... Blowflies in the Conclave ointment ... What can go wrong? ... Silvana Olivetti reports from Rome ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from London ... Voting at Australia House ... Polling at the Vatican ... Holding down three public service jobs at once ... LibDems want to tone down the noise ... How to foul-up a cover-up ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt on the case in Blighty ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Judgment of the week ... Justice Ian Harrison in the NSW Supremes dismisses apprehended bias application ... Facebook posts by judge's tipstaff ... Claim made by family values applicant that HH's associate supports gay rights ... Battle with a noted sexual equality campaigner ... Purple pride ... Jurisdictional issue ... Finding that cases are decided by judges, not their staff ... From Justinian's Archive, May 10, 2019 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Late for the list | Main | Migratory thoughts »
Wednesday
Mar162016

Difficulty with the word "could" 

Another expert queries the mysteries of the High Court in ICAC v Cunneen ... Legal historian Evan Whitton draws inspiration from Bob Trimbole ... Appeal courts akin to casinos 

Reid: top appeal cases could be decided either way

Barry Lane says six appellate judges - John Basten, Julie Ward (NSW), Robert French, Ken Hayne, Susan Kiefel, Geoffrey Nettle (High Court) - were wrong to say ICAC had no power to investigate an officer of the NSW Supreme Court, Margaret Cunneen, on suspicion of corruption in connection with a motor accident.

Mr Lane's view will not surprise lawyers; Lord Reid said nearly half the rulings by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords could have gone either way. 

That tends to confirm my suggestion that appeal courts are "casinos, lacking only scantily-clad young ladies offering the gamblers high-octane cocktails. Lawyers can advise clients to have another roll of the dice; they might win, however dubious their case". 

High octane court of appeal

Appellate judges may thus be at risk of dismissal for incapacity, but who is watching? In Germany, they watch judges like hawks to see if a pattern emerges. 

The Casino Effect may partly derive from a peculiarity of the common law. Judging is obviously different from advocacy, but in exactly 850 years judges in England and its hapless colonies have never been trained as judges separately from lawyers, as they are in France.

Nonetheless, the Cunneen matter should not have taxed judges' brains unduly.   

The first part of section 8(2) of the ICAC Act defines corrupt conduct as: "... any conduct that adversely affects ... the exercise of official functions by any public official ..." 

The majority High Court view seems to be that a suspect's conduct is not corrupt if it did not adversely affect an official's function.

Bob Trimbole refutes the learned judges thus. Suppose he offered a judge a bribe, but the beak knocked him back. The official's function was not adversely affected, but Trimbole's conduct could obviously be investigated by the appropriate authorities. 

Trimbole: no corruption if his bride was knocked back

(That reminds me that I had the honour of being the only reptile to attend Bob's entertaining funeral service out in the wilds of Minchinbury - now the home of my hero, Aldi - and so heard a priest with a sense of fun, Fr John Massore, take as his text: All human life is as grass. A 1,200-word sketch of the service can be seen here.)

The second part of s.8(2) is a fortiori, as they say in the trade.

It turns on the word "could". If a suspect's conduct could adversely affect an official's action, that should mean the conduct is corrupt regardless of whether it did or did not adversely affect the official's action. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.