Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Around town ... Punctuation advice from Vic's bar ... Feds throw the book at library marriage ... Treacherous shallows in heterosexual discrimination legislation ... Another scalp in compulsory ticketing regime ... Quick Sandy and the unassisted Tamil ... Hands up for silk in Aotearoa ... Theodora's latest rounds ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Incensed ... Special laws for true believers up in smoke … Extreme unction … Cash splash for prejudice … The two-faced world of Janus Albrechtsen … Stokes, the new Murdoch … Tucker Down Under in relevance rescue mission ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Dark and Stormy times in the US of A ... The MAGA Supreme Court ... Conservative judges flirt with absolute presidential immunity ... A reconfigured Constitution ... Trump's intimidation of witnesses and jurors in NY election fraud case ... Jury deadlocked in Abu Ghraib torture case ... Roger Fitch's Letter from Washington ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Maintaining legal actions ... Maintenance and champerty ... The Lehrmann mess ... From Geoffrey Gibson, Melbourne barrister (retd.) ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"It was a commercial decision ... To suggest anything else would be inaccurate and disingenuous." 

Spokesman for Kerry Stokes explaining the reason for doubling the price of printing the Financial Review on Seven West presses in Perth ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Did Justice Lee get it wrong? ... More on the omnishambles ... Natural and ordinary meaning of the word "rape" ... Disappearance of the ordinary reasonable reader/viewer ... Graham Hryce comments on arguable appeal points ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Late for the list | Main | Migratory thoughts »
Wednesday
Mar162016

Difficulty with the word "could" 

Another expert queries the mysteries of the High Court in ICAC v Cunneen ... Legal historian Evan Whitton draws inspiration from Bob Trimbole ... Appeal courts akin to casinos 

Reid: top appeal cases could be decided either way

Barry Lane says six appellate judges - John Basten, Julie Ward (NSW), Robert French, Ken Hayne, Susan Kiefel, Geoffrey Nettle (High Court) - were wrong to say ICAC had no power to investigate an officer of the NSW Supreme Court, Margaret Cunneen, on suspicion of corruption in connection with a motor accident.

Mr Lane's view will not surprise lawyers; Lord Reid said nearly half the rulings by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords could have gone either way. 

That tends to confirm my suggestion that appeal courts are "casinos, lacking only scantily-clad young ladies offering the gamblers high-octane cocktails. Lawyers can advise clients to have another roll of the dice; they might win, however dubious their case". 

High octane court of appeal

Appellate judges may thus be at risk of dismissal for incapacity, but who is watching? In Germany, they watch judges like hawks to see if a pattern emerges. 

The Casino Effect may partly derive from a peculiarity of the common law. Judging is obviously different from advocacy, but in exactly 850 years judges in England and its hapless colonies have never been trained as judges separately from lawyers, as they are in France.

Nonetheless, the Cunneen matter should not have taxed judges' brains unduly.   

The first part of section 8(2) of the ICAC Act defines corrupt conduct as: "... any conduct that adversely affects ... the exercise of official functions by any public official ..." 

The majority High Court view seems to be that a suspect's conduct is not corrupt if it did not adversely affect an official's function.

Bob Trimbole refutes the learned judges thus. Suppose he offered a judge a bribe, but the beak knocked him back. The official's function was not adversely affected, but Trimbole's conduct could obviously be investigated by the appropriate authorities. 

Trimbole: no corruption if his bride was knocked back

(That reminds me that I had the honour of being the only reptile to attend Bob's entertaining funeral service out in the wilds of Minchinbury - now the home of my hero, Aldi - and so heard a priest with a sense of fun, Fr John Massore, take as his text: All human life is as grass. A 1,200-word sketch of the service can be seen here.)

The second part of s.8(2) is a fortiori, as they say in the trade.

It turns on the word "could". If a suspect's conduct could adversely affect an official's action, that should mean the conduct is corrupt regardless of whether it did or did not adversely affect the official's action. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.