Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Late for the list | Main | Migratory thoughts »
Wednesday
Mar162016

Difficulty with the word "could" 

Another expert queries the mysteries of the High Court in ICAC v Cunneen ... Legal historian Evan Whitton draws inspiration from Bob Trimbole ... Appeal courts akin to casinos 

Reid: top appeal cases could be decided either way

Barry Lane says six appellate judges - John Basten, Julie Ward (NSW), Robert French, Ken Hayne, Susan Kiefel, Geoffrey Nettle (High Court) - were wrong to say ICAC had no power to investigate an officer of the NSW Supreme Court, Margaret Cunneen, on suspicion of corruption in connection with a motor accident.

Mr Lane's view will not surprise lawyers; Lord Reid said nearly half the rulings by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords could have gone either way. 

That tends to confirm my suggestion that appeal courts are "casinos, lacking only scantily-clad young ladies offering the gamblers high-octane cocktails. Lawyers can advise clients to have another roll of the dice; they might win, however dubious their case". 

High octane court of appeal

Appellate judges may thus be at risk of dismissal for incapacity, but who is watching? In Germany, they watch judges like hawks to see if a pattern emerges. 

The Casino Effect may partly derive from a peculiarity of the common law. Judging is obviously different from advocacy, but in exactly 850 years judges in England and its hapless colonies have never been trained as judges separately from lawyers, as they are in France.

Nonetheless, the Cunneen matter should not have taxed judges' brains unduly.   

The first part of section 8(2) of the ICAC Act defines corrupt conduct as: "... any conduct that adversely affects ... the exercise of official functions by any public official ..." 

The majority High Court view seems to be that a suspect's conduct is not corrupt if it did not adversely affect an official's function.

Bob Trimbole refutes the learned judges thus. Suppose he offered a judge a bribe, but the beak knocked him back. The official's function was not adversely affected, but Trimbole's conduct could obviously be investigated by the appropriate authorities. 

Trimbole: no corruption if his bride was knocked back

(That reminds me that I had the honour of being the only reptile to attend Bob's entertaining funeral service out in the wilds of Minchinbury - now the home of my hero, Aldi - and so heard a priest with a sense of fun, Fr John Massore, take as his text: All human life is as grass. A 1,200-word sketch of the service can be seen here.)

The second part of s.8(2) is a fortiori, as they say in the trade.

It turns on the word "could". If a suspect's conduct could adversely affect an official's action, that should mean the conduct is corrupt regardless of whether it did or did not adversely affect the official's action. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.