Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


A biopsy on bias ... Darryl Rangiah and Oscar Wilde … A unity ticket … White flags at Ultimo … The Hyphen … BBC also on the ropes … Cease – FIRE … Why is Murdoch’s bias always wrong about everything? ... Read on >> 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Walter Sofronoff v ACT Integrity Commission kicks off on Monday @ 10.15 am before Justice Abraham ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"What you are not being told by the media anywhere is that the death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn't for DEI."

Charlie Kirk, American conservative and conspiracy theorist on the Texas floods ... The Charlie Kirk Show, July 9, 2025  Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeitgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Being chased by a dog called Rhetoric ... Justice Virginia Bell on rhetorical devices and barristering ... It seems to be a male thing ... Distractions from the truth ... Tulkinghorn asks, where would the bar be without bad rhetoric? ... September 14, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Late for the list | Main | Migratory thoughts »
Wednesday
Mar162016

Difficulty with the word "could" 

Another expert queries the mysteries of the High Court in ICAC v Cunneen ... Legal historian Evan Whitton draws inspiration from Bob Trimbole ... Appeal courts akin to casinos 

Reid: top appeal cases could be decided either way

Barry Lane says six appellate judges - John Basten, Julie Ward (NSW), Robert French, Ken Hayne, Susan Kiefel, Geoffrey Nettle (High Court) - were wrong to say ICAC had no power to investigate an officer of the NSW Supreme Court, Margaret Cunneen, on suspicion of corruption in connection with a motor accident.

Mr Lane's view will not surprise lawyers; Lord Reid said nearly half the rulings by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords could have gone either way. 

That tends to confirm my suggestion that appeal courts are "casinos, lacking only scantily-clad young ladies offering the gamblers high-octane cocktails. Lawyers can advise clients to have another roll of the dice; they might win, however dubious their case". 

High octane court of appeal

Appellate judges may thus be at risk of dismissal for incapacity, but who is watching? In Germany, they watch judges like hawks to see if a pattern emerges. 

The Casino Effect may partly derive from a peculiarity of the common law. Judging is obviously different from advocacy, but in exactly 850 years judges in England and its hapless colonies have never been trained as judges separately from lawyers, as they are in France.

Nonetheless, the Cunneen matter should not have taxed judges' brains unduly.   

The first part of section 8(2) of the ICAC Act defines corrupt conduct as: "... any conduct that adversely affects ... the exercise of official functions by any public official ..." 

The majority High Court view seems to be that a suspect's conduct is not corrupt if it did not adversely affect an official's function.

Bob Trimbole refutes the learned judges thus. Suppose he offered a judge a bribe, but the beak knocked him back. The official's function was not adversely affected, but Trimbole's conduct could obviously be investigated by the appropriate authorities. 

Trimbole: no corruption if his bride was knocked back

(That reminds me that I had the honour of being the only reptile to attend Bob's entertaining funeral service out in the wilds of Minchinbury - now the home of my hero, Aldi - and so heard a priest with a sense of fun, Fr John Massore, take as his text: All human life is as grass. A 1,200-word sketch of the service can be seen here.)

The second part of s.8(2) is a fortiori, as they say in the trade.

It turns on the word "could". If a suspect's conduct could adversely affect an official's action, that should mean the conduct is corrupt regardless of whether it did or did not adversely affect the official's action. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.