Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Appeasement ... Craven backdowns galore … Creative Australia – how to avoid “divisive debates” … Grovels and concealments follow the “Undercover Jew” fiasco … Suppression orders protecting Lattouf terminators … No waves at the Yarts Ministry … Preselection jeopardy for pro-Palestinian pollie … Justice Lee dabbles in “sentient citizenship” … Semites and antisemitism ... Read on ... 

Destruction of Gaza and Ethnic Cleansing

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Sally Dowling SC and the ODPP NSW get a gold stamp from the Sexual Assault Review Report ... "The Review found a consistently high standard of legal analysis concerning the question of whether to proceed with sexual offence prosecutions" ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... T.S Eliot gets it wrong ... Harry cleans up in a fresh round with Murdoch's hacking hacks ... All aboard Rebekah Brooks' "clean ship" ... Windy woman restrained from further flatulent abuse ... Trump claims "sovereign immunity" to skip paying legal costs of £300,000 ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Saints Go Marching In ... Cash cow has to claw its way back to the LCA's inner sanctum ... Stephen Estcourt cleans up in Mercury settlement ... Amex rides two horses in expiring guarantee cases ... Simmo bins the paperwork ... Attorneys General should not come from the solicitors' branch ... Goings On from February 9, 2009 ... Read more >>


 

 

« Are you being served? | Main | Moulds remain unbroken »
Monday
Jul172017

Horse talk

Yarraside Barrister's reputation repaired with award of aggravated damages against The Age ... Defamatory articles lingered on the internet ... Serious award for seriously hurt feelings 

Rebel Wilson swept into the Victorian Supreme Court in June trailed by Hollywood glamour and significant press interest in her defamation case against Bauer Media. 

The jury, overseen by Justice John Dixon, found in Wilson's favour. It was one of the Supreme Court's more colourful cases, with such episodes as the jury being shown photographs from the plaintiff's childhood, including of her handling dogs and on holiday in South Africa petting a lion. 

A great result for Wilson's brief Matt Collins QC. 

As the saying goes, you win some, you lose some, and in another defamation case brought by fellow Melbourne barrister Damian Sheales against The Age and its racing writer Patrick Bartley, Matt's clients came second.  

HH awarded Sheales $175,000 in damages for Bartley's article which claimed the barrister in representing two trainers, Mark Kavanagh and Danny O'Brien, had negligently misstated facts to a Racing Victoria inquiry into the effects of cobalt on racehorses. 

The damages included an award for aggravation because the article was an "unwarranted personal attack" by the reporter. 

Among other things, the article compared Sheales' appearance before the stewards to "a theatrical performance reminiscent of Rumpole of the Bailey". 

The defamation jury found one of two imputations were conveyed: 

"In making submissions to a Racing Victoria stewards' hearing in his capacity as a lawyer, the plaintiff acted negligently in misstating facts about whether cobalt in performance enhancing in horses and whether it is harmful." 

The defendants submitted that because the article appeared on page 37 of the print edition of The Age, only a small fraction of the readership of the paper would have read it. 

Justice Dixon did not accept this as mitigating the seriousness of the defamatory imputation. He found that readers with an interest in horse racing would have encountered that particular article. The story was also significant in the public consciousness because of its links to Black Caviar's trainer Peter Moody and the high profile of Sheales' racing clients. 

Sheales: described as a "robust" character

The Age also argued that damages should be mitigated because Sheales had himself made misstatements about individuals who gave evidence in the trial, including an academic who had written about cobalt. 

Dixon said that that Sheales' submissions in the Racing Victoria hearing were "not immune from legitimate and serious criticism". Furthermore, he noted that in the course of the trial "there was some strength to the defendants' submission that the ferocity of the plaintiff's attacks on the reputations of others were unnecessary to making out his case and at times bordered on conduct unbecoming for a member of counsel". 

Justice Dixon appears to have accepted that the high emotion was a result of Sheales' great sense of injury and embarrassment at the publications. 

The plaintiff was awarded aggravated damages because the defendants failed to apologise for the defamatory articles after Sheales contacted them and failed to remove the articles from the internet until after the jury returned its verdict. 

The judge thought this increased the plaintiff's subjective hurt. 

See: Damian Sheales v The Age 

Elif Sekercioglu reporting

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.