Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Potty Mouth Solicitor Dispatched ... NSW Court of Appeal takes dim view of solicitor who laced his correspondence with disrespectful insults ... Insufficiently professional ... Arrived from Greece with only his underpants ... No contrition ... Anthony Kanaan files ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Suing for defamation - it's such a good idea ...Federal Court of Australia ... Sydney barrister loses bid for extension of time to bring appeal over decision allowing Giles George to intervene to seek an equitable lien over costs ... Falling out between barrister and firm after successful defamation action ... No error or procedural unfairness ... From Stephen Murray at the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Review of the operation of the FCFCA ... No suggestion that the courts should be subsumed by the Federal Court of Australia ... Instead, it's largely not understood that the FCFC consists of two separate courts ... "Unfortunate nicknames" ... Consideration of name change urged, along with further review of the federal law jurisdiction ... On it goes ... Report >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I've stopped six wars in the last - I'm averaging about a war a month. But the last three were very close together. India and Pakistan, and a lot of them. Congo was just and Rwanda was just done, but you probably know I won't go into it very much, because I don't know the final numbers yet. I don't know. Numerous people were killed, and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years, intermittently, and we solved that war. You probably saw it just came out over the wire, so we solved it ..."

President Donald Trump at a meeting in Scotland with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer ... July 28, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Home Duties ... The dumping of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus ... Behind the scenes ... Bastardry among the brothers ... Unfinished business ... Family law, privacy ... Considerable policy and legislative results ... Here's Michelle Rowland as AG ... What are her priors? ... Polly Peck reports from the Gallery ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Abolish silks ... Sydney SC writes to the editor calling for abolition of the silk system ... Appointments are anachronistic ... It's not a matter of ability, only notability ... Secret blackballing ... "Corrupt" process ... Confessions from an insider who played the game ... From Justinian's Archive, October 24, 2002 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Are you being served? | Main | Moulds remain unbroken »
Monday
Jul172017

Horse talk

Yarraside Barrister's reputation repaired with award of aggravated damages against The Age ... Defamatory articles lingered on the internet ... Serious award for seriously hurt feelings 

Rebel Wilson swept into the Victorian Supreme Court in June trailed by Hollywood glamour and significant press interest in her defamation case against Bauer Media. 

The jury, overseen by Justice John Dixon, found in Wilson's favour. It was one of the Supreme Court's more colourful cases, with such episodes as the jury being shown photographs from the plaintiff's childhood, including of her handling dogs and on holiday in South Africa petting a lion. 

A great result for Wilson's brief Matt Collins QC. 

As the saying goes, you win some, you lose some, and in another defamation case brought by fellow Melbourne barrister Damian Sheales against The Age and its racing writer Patrick Bartley, Matt's clients came second.  

HH awarded Sheales $175,000 in damages for Bartley's article which claimed the barrister in representing two trainers, Mark Kavanagh and Danny O'Brien, had negligently misstated facts to a Racing Victoria inquiry into the effects of cobalt on racehorses. 

The damages included an award for aggravation because the article was an "unwarranted personal attack" by the reporter. 

Among other things, the article compared Sheales' appearance before the stewards to "a theatrical performance reminiscent of Rumpole of the Bailey". 

The defamation jury found one of two imputations were conveyed: 

"In making submissions to a Racing Victoria stewards' hearing in his capacity as a lawyer, the plaintiff acted negligently in misstating facts about whether cobalt in performance enhancing in horses and whether it is harmful." 

The defendants submitted that because the article appeared on page 37 of the print edition of The Age, only a small fraction of the readership of the paper would have read it. 

Justice Dixon did not accept this as mitigating the seriousness of the defamatory imputation. He found that readers with an interest in horse racing would have encountered that particular article. The story was also significant in the public consciousness because of its links to Black Caviar's trainer Peter Moody and the high profile of Sheales' racing clients. 

Sheales: described as a "robust" character

The Age also argued that damages should be mitigated because Sheales had himself made misstatements about individuals who gave evidence in the trial, including an academic who had written about cobalt. 

Dixon said that that Sheales' submissions in the Racing Victoria hearing were "not immune from legitimate and serious criticism". Furthermore, he noted that in the course of the trial "there was some strength to the defendants' submission that the ferocity of the plaintiff's attacks on the reputations of others were unnecessary to making out his case and at times bordered on conduct unbecoming for a member of counsel". 

Justice Dixon appears to have accepted that the high emotion was a result of Sheales' great sense of injury and embarrassment at the publications. 

The plaintiff was awarded aggravated damages because the defendants failed to apologise for the defamatory articles after Sheales contacted them and failed to remove the articles from the internet until after the jury returned its verdict. 

The judge thought this increased the plaintiff's subjective hurt. 

See: Damian Sheales v The Age 

Elif Sekercioglu reporting

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.