Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


A biopsy on bias ... Darryl Rangiah and Oscar Wilde … A unity ticket … White flags at Ultimo … The Hyphen … BBC also on the ropes … Cease – FIRE … Why is Murdoch’s bias always wrong about everything? ... Read on >> 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Walter Sofronoff v ACT Integrity Commission kicks off on Monday @ 10.15 am before Justice Abraham ... Judicial review of corruption finding ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"What you are not being told by the media anywhere is that the death toll likely would not have been as high if it wasn't for DEI."

Charlie Kirk, American conservative and conspiracy theorist on the Texas floods ... The Charlie Kirk Show, July 9, 2025  Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeitgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Being chased by a dog called Rhetoric ... Justice Virginia Bell on rhetorical devices and barristering ... It seems to be a male thing ... Distractions from the truth ... Tulkinghorn asks, where would the bar be without bad rhetoric? ... September 14, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Leave application rejected | Main | Boxing beats scholarship »
Thursday
Sep262013

Losing touch with ourselves 

Junior Junior goes all political ... Her sought-after insights on the federal election and the bar's tussle over incorporation ... Time for change ... Colleagues agree 

SEPTEMBER has been an enormous month for politics - not only the federal election, but politics at the NSW bar over the incorporation drama. 

Me? I was ambivalent about both. 

Not because I don't care, but only because as far as the choice for running the country was concerned the options were crap. 

As for being an incorporated barrister, I don't fancy it - but I don't have an issue if someone else wants to do it. 

However, I do have an issue with the forest that was felled in the propaganda war from both sides. 

I got to the point where I was throwing out any prepaid envelopes with my name incorrectly spelled. 

To me, the federal election result said that Australians wanted stability - even if that stability comes at a high cost. 

As far as I can see those costs include the environment, women's rights, gay rights, human rights and virtually all other rights that should be self-evident. 

There wasn't much to choose between: a petulant man-child, a bumbling intransigent, a gaggle of yokels, a rich, dinosaur-loving nutter, Hanson, shooters, Christians, and so on. 

It raises the issue of compulsory voting and whether it is doing more harm than good. 

And then there are those preference deals, which allow all sorts of fringe dwellers to end-up with the balance of power. 

Craziness all round, I say. 

In three years time most people would have realised that whoever they voted for in 2013 was a mistake. 

The incorporation debate shows that the bar is working in the opposite direction to the general Australian public.  

While the average Aussie voter is calling for change at any cost, the geriatrics of the bar are demanding no change at any cost.  

I think the bar is doing itself a disservice by attempting to insulate itself from change. It will slowly become extinct if it doesn't get modern. 

Of course, it has a perfect right to stay stuck-in-the-mud if it wants to. 

Lots of younger barristers I've talked to think the bar has lost touch with the outside world in terms of how it is perceived. 

It is no longer regarded as the repository of legal wisdom and an honourable profession untainted by human foibles. 

Some grizzly barristers still see themselves in the same way the clergy used to regard itself - untouchable and immune. 

Perhaps we will have to allow ourself as barristers, in order to survive, to be more of a business and less the pretence of a profession. 

Of course, it would be nice if it was a business that upheld some noble ideals and acted for the poor, etc. 

We can call ourselves a profession all we want, but there isn't a profession that has not been found out for what it is: a bunch of flawed people just trying to do the best for themselves and the customers. 

Anyway, that's what I think. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.