Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Holiday season ... Mother's Day, Lent, Chocolate ... Publisher wants money from Russell Brand for unpublished books ... Paralegal accessed forbidden documents to qualify for legal training contract ... Birthday card payout ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« No fixed address | Main | Are you being served? »
Monday
Aug282017

Snowshoeing

Clerkship applications ... Finding something to talk about in the interview ... Slots on the partners' cards ... Cocktail evenings in high-heels ... Barely Legal busily reformatting paragraph indentations 

"You're so lucky," a later-year JD friend once told me. "Your hobbies are really weird. The firms will love you."

This was clerkship application logic if I'd ever heard it. Thing was, she was probably right. When you and two hundred of your closest law school frenemies are all applying for clerkships at the same corporate firms, you'll milk anything to stand out. Up to and including eccentric extracurriculars. Footy and going to the movies won't cut it. We're talking steam trains, tropical horticulture and Dalmatians. 

For good or ill, Barely Legal does have a weird hobby. It's a sport unusual enough that it's potentially identifying, so let's just pretend that it's competitive snowshoeing. In any other job market this would be a footnote. More likely, it'd be cut altogether in the quest for that elusive two-page resume. But on a clerkship CV? 

"Snowshoeing? What? OK, put it at the top." This from my law school's careers advisor. "They'll definitely ask about it, and then you'll have something to talk about in the interview."

This was great news - God forbid they ask me any questions about the law.

Her eyes scoured the remainder of my resume with clinical detachment. "Oh good, you went to a public school. The algorithm will be looking for low socio-economic indicators." 

I laughed. She didn't. 

I decided it was good to know that some firms outsourced the earliest rounds of the hiring processes to a machine. I spent the rest of the afternoon reformatting the paragraph indentations on my resume to achieve mathematical perfection. 

Fear not if by this stage you haven't managed to tell HR about yourself in excruciating detail, because the simple act of filling out mandatory biographical questions on the firm's website will remove any doubt that you're entitled to a life free from corporate diversity quotas. 

Are you LGBT? Are you Indigenous? Do you identify as a gender other than male or female? What extenuating circumstances, physical or mental, have prevented you from achieving higher marks? What is your ethnic background? Do you have any outstanding infringements? Does anybody really love you?

But these kinds of drop down boxes were easy compared to drafting the cover letters. Weeks were lost, civilisations fell. Whispers began spreading about the existence of a magical template, available only - like everything at the law school - if you knew the right people.

Rumour had it that the use of this template would guarantee you at least two interviews rounds. Yet as far as Barely Legal could tell, the firms actually intending to hire people by interview were rarer than a $4 coffee.

I could brace myself for the online psychometric tests and the discursive answer sections (Please reflect on the rule of law in Australian society in 150 characters or less). But the cocktail evenings were another matter: wearing high heels, holding your liquor, schmoozing the partners, and good old-fashioned Hunger Games jockeying. 

"Each partner at the party has two slots on their card," a veteran of one firm's 'cocktail evening' explained.

"You have to approach each one and convince them why you deserve one of those slots. The best strategy is to team up with someone, then you can sell each other to the partners. Except I think they're onto that now. You'll have to think of something else."

Just as well hours of manually inputting every mark I'd ever received for a tertiary subject had deadened my basic human instincts. Fear was now but a concept, but curiosity remained: did anyone really, truly care how I'd done in first year Post Modernist Art History?

Apparently, yes.

A classmate sidled up to me the morning after the clerkship application deadline. "Did you get an email from the firms this morning?" she asked. "Saying something like, 'thanks for choosing our firm, your application is now being considered'?" 

"Yeah." I was exhausted, I was relieved, I was trying to blot out my memory of the last month by staring fixedly into my iPhone flashlight.

"Aw, too bad, that means your average grade is below their 'clearly in' number. Did they ask you to do more online tests?"

They had, doling out a very reasonable 48 hours in which to submit myself to a third party multiple choice exam that would determine whether my brain was a logical instrument or a garbage fire. 

I turned up the power on the flashlight and wondered if mass cellular death was something I'd need to disclose on another form.

Hey kid, I comforted myself. You'll always have snowshoeing.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.