Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Tasmanis's Lieutenant Guv (and CJ) Christopher Shenanigans is unlikely to decide the consitiutional impass ... The current guv'nor, former Circuit Court judge and family lawyer Barbara Baker returns to Guv House next week ... Labor hates the Greens and is unlikely to form a coalition government ... Another election looks likely as the numbers for both sides are brittle and unreliable ... However, Baker can ask the Labor leader to test his numbers. 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Killing the goose | Main | The short goodbye »
Monday
Jan242011

The dash to mediocrity

Law Council fails to justify ethically flawed solicitors' conduct rules ... Law Society of New South Wales covers the problem in waffle ... Theodora on the barricades about conflicts and client "consent"

The Law Council of Australia didn't try very hard to come up with an imaginative response to my editor's story about the flawed solicitors' conduct rules.

The story was here in Justinian and here in The Sydney Morning Herald

The two most objectionable rules singled out for criticism both relate to watering down the information to be given clients about a solicitor's potential conflicts.

See the new conduct rules HERE.

Rule 11 will allow solicitors to rely on "implied consent" when concurrently acting for two clients whose interests are "adverse".

For instance, if the information about the conflict is buried in a detailed retainer agreement that would be sufficient to establish "consent".

Rule 12 permits solicitors to accept referral fees if they have "informed consent". The problem is they don't have to inform the client how much they are trousering.

These two rules alone represent a lowering of fiduciary standards, dressed up as "consumer protection".

While the rules seek to protect solicitors from ethical complaints, it opens lawyers to civil actions for breach of duty.

The editor's outpouring included a swipe at the Chief Justices, who should have put a stop to this proposed lax regime, which we understand was supported and driven by the LCA's Large Law Firm Group.

The lame rebuttal from the new president of the LCA, Alex Ward, majestically avoided addressing the central allegations.

Instead, he fearlessly denied something than had not been asserted.

"It is incorrect to assert or imply that the Chief Justices of this country had any part to play in the creation or approval of, the Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules.

To suggest otherwise is mischievous and unhelpful in any rational debate on the appropriateness or otherwise of the content of the rules...

The Law Council welcomes informed comment on the contents of these rules, but to imply that the Law Council process was unduly influenced by one of its constituencies, or anyone else, is wrong."

There was no attempt to justify the vice at the heart of the issue.

As they stand, these rules, with their half-baked disclosure requirements, represent a dash to mediocrity.

The Law Society of New South Wales also skirted the issue. Asked about this dilution of fiduciary responsibility back came an artfully crafted PR response:

"The Law Society of New South Wales supports uniform national conduct rules for solicitors and has been closely engaged in the development process of the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules. This has included making suggestions about the content and drafting of a number of the proposed rules... The Law Society always welcomes submissions on proposed new rules in response to this [consultation] process. The Law Society Council will consider the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules in their final form, and their adoption in NSW, in the coming months."

It is understood that Western Australia and South Australia are not supportive of the rules as they stand.

We may end-up with a national profession without unified rules.

Let's hope that the AGs and the CJs wise up to what's happening and do something...

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.