Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Cancelling Dicey | Main | Damp spirits »
Thursday
Mar172022

The ethnography of law school electives

The subjects they choose ... Divining the character and culture of law students ... What becomes of them? ... Corporations and tax ... Labour law ... Sports law ... Antonin Scalia law ... Human rights .. Equity ... Philosophy ... The different choices are defining ... Barely Legal reports 

From first to third years, law students hide themselves in the anonymity of giant tort and contracts lectures. But all good things must come to an end, and with the final two years of law school comes the opportunity to show their true colours through elective selection. 

Through careful study of these classes, we can parse the subtle (and less-than-subtle) differences between different student cultures.

Corporate and tax law electives (which make up a hefty bulk of the electives on offer at Sydney, unsurprisingly) are a haven for the Comm/Law grad. Peering over shoulders and at the screens of those in attendance provides a masterclass in how to build (and lose) a small fortune through crypto trading before the age of 24. 

Learning about the world of high finance, "tax minimisation" and corporate power could provide deep insights into where power really lies in Australia and how our economy works. Unfortunately, the only goal for these students is to extract a profit from that system. I imagine they will be quite successful.

At the other end of the spectrum, labour law classes are filled with the law school's small bleeding-heart faction. Specifically: sweet but incompetent Labor Left hacks; cruel and incompetent Labor Right shills; puritanical Marxists; and students with real jobs in hospitality (who have spent the last few years risking COVID to ensure the former groups can enjoy almond milk lattes). 

Regardless, as the lecturer dolefully noted in the course's first class, most will go on to represent employers against their workers.

Sports law forces two distinctive tribes into the same classroom. There are bookish honours students, keen to take a "WAM boosting course" as a leg up into a first-class honours. 

And the second, are students from the elite athlete program - who can receive admission into competitive law courses with an ATAR 5 points lower than the required minimum. 

Unsurprisingly, there is little studied interaction between the two.

Under the banner of a "US Constitutional Law" class, the law school convenes bi-weekly meetings of the Justice Scalia fan club. Here, law students are (as ever) keen to cast off aspersions that young people are more progressive than previous generations. 

The attire of choice is chinos, button ups in Young Lib Blue, RM Williams and the lanyard from their corporate firm. 

They are keen not to let discussion of caselaw, or the lecturer, interrupt their praise for states' rights, small government and originalism. It seems like a missed opportunity that the law school doesn't have a permanent exchange program with US colleges. 

Human rights law students have spent the last few years preparing for the course in Model UN. On last count, Amal Clooney posters adorned the walls of 92 percent of attendants. 

Their deep knowledge of global politics, built on their experience of impersonating an Azerbaijani UN rep when they were 18, is used to continually remind their lecturer that actually "the issue is much more complicated". 

While they are (of course) human rights supporters, they're keen to play devil's advocate. That will stand them in good stead. Despite their dreams of being a celebrity human rights lawyer, à la Ms Clooney, they're more likely to spend the next few years drafting Australia's responses to the UNHCR denying human rights abuses on our numerous island prisons.

Brave students who venture into the difficult advanced equity electives are the crème de la crème of young legal minds, or (at least) think themselves to be. Overheard in one class, a student professed that he strongly identified with a young Dyson Heydon: "I think he'd see a lot of himself in me." 

All law students must take at least one philosophy course with the law school. While serious philosophical study will be new to most, that doesn't stop the vocal minority from concluding that they have the answers to millennia-old questions about justice, rights and law. One could guess that study of the works of great minds might humble law students, but these classes show that really nothing will. 

Hart is clearly wrong, they declare; Mill, a fool who failed to consider the obvious; Raz, just an idiot. If only these illustrious thinkers had the chance to run their ideas past a group of LLB Vs before publication, then they might have stood a chance. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.