Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Sofronoff stripped bare ... Deceit ... Betrayal ... Drumgold hung out to dry as a result of Sofronoff-Albrechtsen information "tryst" ... Latest derailment of conspiracies about the prosecution of manosphere darling, Bruce Lehrmann ... Derangement syndrome ... Sofronoff's "serious corruption" ... Devastation among devoted Banana Benders ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Bag lady ... Don't call the results until the fat lady sings … Senator's criminal record hidden from view … Inspiration from our B-grade business leaders … Forget the sexual harassment, Dicey Heydon is coming out of the deep freeze ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Capital crimes ... Dangerous words likely to be scrubbed from the Trump era lexicon ... Musk and his techie vandals ... The shredder going full blast at the FBI ... Stolen national security documents sent back to Mar-a-Lago ... Cabinet clown show ... White supremacy unleashed ... Consumer protection prosecutions dropped ... Lawyers and law firms threatened ... Roger Fitch from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"True to form, the ACT corruption watchdog has put itself at the centre of perceptions of bias with a finding against eminent former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC that serves only to debase the definition of serious corrupt conduct."

The Australian with its unique perspective on "bias" ... March 22, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Judgment for sale ... Melbourne University Publishing's decision to produce Justice Lee's Lehrmann judgment as a commercial product is not without its problems ... The omnishambles continues ... Melbourne lawyer Nilay B. Patel explains ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Defamation and other misadventures ... So sexy, said the actress of the Chief Justice ... Daphnis dunks women in hot water ... Another (male) judge frocks-up ... Inside Madge's mouth ... Stephen Archer defamed ... David Levine strangles more English ... Justice Dean Mildren "the idiot" ... From Justinian's archive, April 22, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Fresh disruption | Main | Dot and the dinosaurs »
Thursday
May242018

The wide and deep "missing middle"

Funding models and costs for legal services ... A voice from deep within Victoria Legal Aid ... Bare-boned applicants for legal aid ... Federal funding the lowest for 20 years ... Peach Melba on the barricades 

Amid all its fanfare about tax relief, the federal government's budget shows that it is not spending on under-resourced public services. The crisis in funding for the public legal sector is so great that on May 10, the Senate passed a motion calling on the government "to reverse the downward trend in legal aid funding". 

Senator Stirling Griff (Centre Alliance, SA), who moved the motion on National Pro Bono Day, said that the federal government's contribution to legal aid has fallen to its lowest level in 20 years.  

The structure of the community legal system means that when there's a shortfall from the top, the ripple spreads wide. 

State legal aid services provide legal assistance not only through their own lawyers, they also provide short and long-term funding to community legal centres, such as Melbourne's Fitzroy Legal Service. 

Fortunately, in Victoria the state budget has allocated an extra $37.3 million to Victoria Legal Aid over four years. This is to enable VLA to meet the increased need for legal services resulting from the government's injection of $97 million for police prosecutors.

Nonetheless, legal need in Victoria far outstrips the resources of community legal services. The eligibility requirements for a VLA grant of aid are very difficult to meet - based on an income and assets means test. 

An applicant will qualify for a grant if they, and any financially associated person, have a net disposable income of $360, or less, a week. 

Any more than that, and the applicant is required to pay an initial contribution from their income towards their legal costs. 

For the purposes of the assets test, VLA does not count equity of up to $500,000 in a principal home. This means that an individual with property, but low income, may be eligible for funding, while an applicant who does not own a house, but has more cash flow, may not. 

Such strict requirements result in a "missing middle" - individuals who aren't eligible for legal aid funding, but do not have the resources to retain a lawyer for the entirety or a part of their legal matter. 

National Legal Aid, in its submission to the Productivity Commission's Access to Justice paper stated that the difference in the cost of a lawyer at market rate is significantly higher than the legal aid rate, resulting in a "significant justice gap".

When it comes to financial barriers to access to justice, two factors feed in. 

Legal aid is underfunded, which in turn means community legal centres are underfunded. The private legal sector operates on a user pays business model, underscored by a significant tension - firms want their lawyers to notch up as many billable hours as possible, whereas the interest of the client is to pay as little as possible for the legal work.  

Predictably, disagreements between lawyers and clients over costs gives rise to many disputes, at a high enough volume that the Supreme Court of Victoria deals with them at the Costs Court.

The Legal Profession Uniform Law stipulates that "law practices must not charge more than fair and reasonable amounts for legal costs". 

However, fair and reasonable hourly rates for lawyers are determined by the market, which is a creature of convention, supply and demand. 

At this tier of the legal system, clients are viewed as consumers who are charged what they will bear. 

The market reality of the distribution of legal services, and the "missing middle" it creates, is so entrenched in the legal system that the federal funds required to fix it are beyond reasonable expectation. 

Nonetheless, funding cuts directly affect access for those who might otherwise currently qualify for aid. 

From Elif Sekercioglu, who is an intern at Victoria Legal Aid and a volunteer at Fitzroy Legal Service 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.