Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Merits review ... AAT member's unzipped opinions ... Conservative elbows flailing in all directions ... Unrestrained by convention ... Another KC survey for the Apple Isle Bar ... Push by old buffers to trade in their SCs ... Fascination with gilded embroidery ... Theodora reports ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Back in the ring ... Rape on the minister’s couch … Cover-up … Of course, there was a cover-up … Bettina Arndt and the Institute for the Presumption of Bruce Lehrmann’s Innocence … Linda Reynolds needs sympathy and money … Justice Lee’s loose crumbs ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Plus ça change ... Racism and prejudice ... The police and their cultural predilections ... The ABC and its Lattouf problem ... Reprising Allan Ashbolt and Talbot Duckmanton ... Hard-line interest groups and special pleaders still bashing away at Aunty ... Procrustes files ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Justinian's Bloggers

Celebrations at the Lubyanka ... NSW Supreme Court judges gear up for a big birthday party ... Planned revelries ... Serious reflections ... History by the yards ... Monumental book ... Artworks ... Musicale ... From Miss Ginger Snatch, an associate of judges ... Read more ... 

"A Legal Braveheart who is a defender of the rule of law. Sofronoff had the courage to expose legal misadventure of the sort that must never be condoned. He deserves the nation's gratitude."

Rule of Law Institute plugging a forthcoming lecture by Walter Sofronoff with a quote from an editorial in The Australian. April 19, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Algorithmic injustices ... Criminal justice in the data age ... The lurking dangers when algorithms are used to dispense justice ... Predicting the pattern of potential offenders ... Anthony Kanaan interviews Dr Tatiana Dancy, author of Artificial Justice ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Hoot ... Hoot ... No win, lots of fees – remembering Copper 7 … Conflicts and compromises ... Law and Social Work get cognate at U.Syd … Judge Felicity – feisty telly star … Wendler’s marmalade – by appointment ... From Justinian's Archive, July 30, 2010 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Love letters to a cat | Main | Sydney lawyers and TINS »
Monday
Apr202009

Who killed Dr Kelly?

Clarence Darrow and the vanishing art of advocacy … Doctors convinced David Kelly was murdered … Alex Mitchell files from what’s left of Fleet Street ... From Justinian's archive, July 20, 2009 

IN a review of Donald McRae’s book, The Old Devil: Clarence Darrow, the World’s Greatest Trial Lawyer, published by Simon & Schuster, The Guardian’s legal affairs man Marcel Berlins last week complained about the loss of theatricality and passion among today’s barristers. 

Noting that Darrow invariably appeared on behalf of the underdog and often won apparent lost causes, Berlins wrote: 

“He did so by sheer persuasion, backed by a powerful presence, a magnetic way with words and, above all, what must have been extraordinary oratorical skills, an actor’s talent as much as a lawyer’s.” 

Berlins, no mean raconteur himself as well as a huge wine buff, named Edward Marshall Hall as Darrow’s only English equivalent, saying that crowds would form at courts to hear him speak. 

“On one occasion, defending a pathetic prostitute on a charge of murder, he ended his plea to the all-male jury by pointing to her and, with a sob in his softest voice: ‘Look at her. God never gave her a chance. Won’t you?’ 

The jury acquitted.” 

Berlins concluded that today’s barristers have abandoned vocal and behavioural flair for hum-drum legal profundities delivered in a flat monotone. 

“Much more effective, no doubt,” he grumbled, “and so boring”. 

A couple of days later two briefs from Matrix Chambers, Alex Bailin and Alison Macdonald, took issue with The Guardian’s grumpy commentator and recalled an incident from the flamboyant career of their former colleague, Tony Jennings QC. 

“When representing a man charged with masturbating a dolphin, Tony had adduced evidence that the aquatic mammal sometimes uses its sexual organ as a foraging tool. In closing, he reminded the jury that ‘You don’t often see a man pushing his trolley around Tesco’s with his penis, do you?’ Unable to disagree, they duly acquitted.” 

*   *   *

Dr Kelly: suicide finding a boost for BlairThe case of Dr David Kelly, the senior government scientist found dead near his home in Oxfordshire on July 18, 2003, has come back to haunt the British government and the judicial establishment. 

His body was found in woodlands after he had been subjected to repeated grillings by security committees about media leaks and his assessment of the government's claim about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. 

The stories sourced to those alleged leaks were to the effect that the Blair government had gone to war in Iraq knowing that claims about weapons of mass destruction were untrue. 

Kelly left no suicide note and none of his colleagues believed the veteran United Nations arms inspector was the type to crack under pressure. 

However, Lord Hutton’s inquiry concluded that Kelly killed himself, giving a timely boost to Tony Blair and leading to the resignations of BBC director-general Greg Dyke and chairman Gavyn Davies. 

Now a team of 13 doctors is launching a legal challenge to Hutton’s patsy findings. 

Based on the medical opinions of a number of eminent specialists, the doctors are convinced that Kelly was murdered. 

Their report calls Hutton’s conclusions “flawed” and they are demanding the resumption of a full inquest under the Coroners Act

The original inquest was suspended in extraordinary circumstances on the orders of then Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, who deemed that the Hutton inquiry fulfilled “the functions of an inquest”. 

Hutton’s verdict was that “the principal cause of death was bleeding from incised wounds to the left wrist” exacerbated by “silent coronary heart disease” and the ingestion of pain-killers. 

David Halpin a retired lecturer in anatomy at King’s College London, said on behalf of the group mounting the challenge: 

“We reject hemorrhage the cause of death and see no contrary opinion which would stand its ground. I think it highly likely he was assassinated.” 

The doctors concur that the bleeding from the ulnar artery would not have been sufficient to cause death. 

Hutton: findings challenged by doctors The two ambulance officers who collected the body also stated that there were only minor bloodstains at the scene. 

The doctors are represented by solicitor Martin Day of Leigh Day & Co and barrister Richard Harmer QC. 

Hutton has form. 

He represented the Ministry of Defence at the inquest into the 1972 killing of Northern Ireland civil rights marchers in 1972. 

In 1999 he was part of a panel that overturned a Law Lords decision in favour of the extradition of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. 

Meanwhile, a film entitled The Anthrax War directed by Bob Coen is receiving enthusiastic reviews at fringe screenings in London and has been bought by SBS. 

It gives details of Kelly’s role as head of microbiology at the UK’s Porton Down, the top secret laboratory for research into germ and chemical warfare. 

Apart from books and films, there’s got to be an opera out of all.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.