Free Newsletter sign-up

 

Justinian's news stories

Slaters sliced ... Pulling up the anchor at Slater & Gordon ... Where are the silken crime briefs? ... Bulletin from The Map ... Language of the law ... Human right to use the court's bathroom ... Theodora reports ... Read more ... 


Search Justinian
Justinian Columnists

Hypocrite alert ... Young Christian sacked by employer because she was a NO voter ... SSM ... Andrew Bolt, never the sharpest tool in the shed, makes a mess of his free speech credentials ... Subeta Vimalarajah on inconsistent anti-discrimination laws ... Read more ... 


This form does not yet contain any fields.

    "[Victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests] volunteered that they felt at peace with themselves after being listened to by Peter O'Callaghan. As Commissioner, Peter achieved a unique thing – in [Václav] Havel's words he helped countless people 'orient their spirit' and gave them the certainty that their lives made sense Peter gave them hope just as it is described by Havel."

    Former High Court judge Susan Crennan at the unveiling of the portrait of Melbourne barrister Peter O'Callagan QC who ran Archbishop Pell's Melbourne Response to sexual abuse by priests. The Royal Commission reported that he failed to report criminal offences to the police. September 26, 2017 ... Read more ... 


    Justinian Featurettes

    Anonymous campaign against Barry Dangerous ... Restlessness among the senior prefects of the NSW Law Soc ... New junior vice sworn-in ... Councillors stirring against senior vice with strange memo in circulation ... Read more ... 


    Justinian's archive

    Whitelocke on Lawmanship ... Beguiling pastiche of barristerial posturing ... The importance of looking the part ... The Velvet Salamander transforms into the Silver Canetoad ... James Hutton reviews Bullstrode Whitelocke’s essential text for advocates ... From Justinian's archive, July 13, 2010 ... Read more ... 


     

    « The constitutionality of unrepresentative swill | Main | A place in the community »
    Wednesday
    Jun222016

    Brandis and his "boutique controversies"

    Following his debate with George Brandis on Monday evening, shadow AG Mark Dreyfus QC gives an assessment of his opponent and reviews the damage wrought by the current attorney general ... "Not fit for office"   

    At the AG Debate: George Brandis doesn't look happy and has turned a funny colour

    Conservative attorneys general sometimes think they should be basically passive: a steady set of hands overseeing the legal system, law enforcement and security. Senator Brandis endorsed this view during Monday's debate, claiming proudly several times that his years in office had been more or less unremarkable. 

    Audio here 

    Unfortunately, Senator Brandis has fallen short of even his own low standards: a man who aspired to mediocrity and failed. 

    Senator Brandis has in fact been a conspicuous member of the Abbott-Turnbull Government - for all the wrong reasons. At the end of his first, and we should hope last, term as attorney general, it's worth remembering just what a trail of destruction he has left behind. 

    The attorney general is meant to make sure all Australians have access to justice. While Senator Brandis has found $160 million dollars for the divisive marriage equality plebiscite dreamed-up by Tony Abbott and supported by Malcolm Turnbull, he has ripped money away from vital legal assistance services, including those serving Indigenous communities and women suffering from domestic violence.  

    There's more in store - Senator Brandis will cut almost a third of all federal funding to Community Legal Centres after the election.  

    During the pre-election debate this week, Senator Brandis would only acknowledge his tenure had been marked by "boutique controversies" discussed in "law school common rooms". If he went and talked to the people waiting in community legal centre waiting rooms, he may take a different view.

    The attorney general is meant to oversee Australia's human rights framework, but Senator Brandis has spent much of his term doing his best to undermine it. 

    He famously declared to the first Indigenous woman elected to federal Parliament that "people do have a right to be bigots". He spent his first year in office trying to tear down Australia's protections against hate speech and, while he was forced to back down, has never ruled out trying to do so again. 

    Senator Brandis participated in disgraceful attacks on Professor Gillian Triggs, president of the independent Human Rights Commission, just for doing her duty, and even tried to bully her into resigning her post. That resulted in a successful censure motion in the Senate, declaring him unfit to hold the office of attorney general.

    The AG is meant to safeguard the courts, the legal system and the rule of law. But on Senator Brandis' watch, the courts, particularly those dealing with the family law matters of ordinary Australians, are plagued by backlogs and bottlenecks. He has neglected communities around the country by refusing to fill vacancies in their local federal court registry. But then, he doesn't think the courts are for ordinary people - he's persisting with a plan to prevent Australians challenging developments which harm their local environment.

    Now we've learned that Senator Brandis, the first law officer of the Commonwealth, has launched an unprecedented attack on the second law officer, solicitor general Justin Gleeson SC. He has reportedly tried to bring the solicitor general under his own exclusive control, a move some think illegal, and in the process may well have misled the parliament 

    The attorney general is meant to promote transparency and open debate, but Senator Brandis has led the biggest attack on our FOI laws since their inception. He spent two years trying to abolish the independent FOI watchdog and in the interim stripped it of its staff and resources, leaving it unable to do its important work. Senator Brandis doesn't believe in open debate. He has sought to gag legal assistance services from speaking out in public debate and working on law reform proposals.

    Australians who care about access to justice, good governance and the rule of law know the wrong that Senator Brandis has inflicted during his three years in office matters.

    Senator Brandis is not fit for office. Only a Labor Government can undo the damage he has inflicted, restoring proper access to justice and protecting the integrity of our legal system. 

    Mark Dreyfus is the Shadow Attorney General and the Shadow Minister for the Arts. He the Labor Party member for Isaacs in the House of Representatives 

    Reader Comments

    There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
    Member Account Required
    You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.