Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Around town ... Punctuation advice from Vic's bar ... Feds throw the book at library marriage ... Treacherous shallows in heterosexual discrimination legislation ... Another scalp in compulsory ticketing regime ... Quick Sandy and the unassisted Tamil ... Hands up for silk in Aotearoa ... Theodora's latest rounds ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Incensed ... Special laws for true believers up in smoke … Extreme unction … Cash splash for prejudice … The two-faced world of Janus Albrechtsen … Stokes, the new Murdoch … Tucker Down Under in relevance rescue mission ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Dark and Stormy times in the US of A ... The MAGA Supreme Court ... Conservative judges flirt with absolute presidential immunity ... A reconfigured Constitution ... Trump's intimidation of witnesses and jurors in NY election fraud case ... Jury deadlocked in Abu Ghraib torture case ... Roger Fitch's Letter from Washington ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Maintaining legal actions ... Maintenance and champerty ... The Lehrmann mess ... From Geoffrey Gibson, Melbourne barrister (retd.) ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's letter from Blighty ... Hugh Grant takes the money and leaves the box ... Last minutism ... And suprise round-up for Rwanda-bound refugees ... Read more ... 

"It was a commercial decision ... To suggest anything else would be inaccurate and disingenuous." 

Spokesman for Kerry Stokes explaining the reason for doubling the price of printing the Financial Review on Seven West presses in Perth ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Did Justice Lee get it wrong? ... More on the omnishambles ... Natural and ordinary meaning of the word "rape" ... Disappearance of the ordinary reasonable reader/viewer ... Graham Hryce comments on arguable appeal points ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Untrustworthy opponents | Main | Deferred examination application »
Friday
Jun282013

I'm a loser

"Why are you here?" the judge asks ... Lessons from a run of losses ... Junior Junior is advised about the virtue of defeat 

THE first year or two of a junior junior's professional life is usually marked by a series of loser briefs.

Solicitors have no qualms in briefing a baby barrister on a matter that is a dog - the baby barrister is cheap and solicitors are saved from the ignominy of being downed. 

But for a junior junior trying to get their hit rate up, it is demoralising.

Nothing says defeat like a string of losing briefs, some of which involve being bawled out by judges for wasting their time.

This is part of the unending joy of early barristerial life.

So, I was relieved when I had Friday night drinks with my floor leader a few weeks ago to be given some reassuring advice. 

First, losing briefs are the bread and butter of junior practice. Secondly, solicitors don't actually expect you to win them (phew), and most losing briefs are lost regardless of who the barrister is.

This idea that a genius barrister never loses a case (à la Rake) is just that, an idea. There is no reality in it.

The barrister with the fanciest pants will lose a hospital pass just the same as a green reader with their first brief. 

After your eighth straight loss, this is a welcome reality.

On more than one occasion, I have been asked by an incredulous judge, "Why are you even here?" 

There is obviously a fine line between an arguable case and a case that is wasting the court's time. 

During a costs argument, after an unmitigated failure of a case, the judge refused to even consider our carefully explained rejection of a Calderbank offer as, "it should have been obvious to your instructing solicitor from the second he received the instructions in the case, that it was bound to lose".  

While I think this was harsh, it was followed by a good 15 minutes being told that all my arguments were bogus. 

Afterward, my opponent apologised to me - he was mortified at the dressing down I had received.

The good news is, if you manage to win one of these rubbish briefs (such as by default of your opponents, the lack of logic on the part of a famous magistrate or some snappy loophole you manage to run), then your solicitor will love you forever.

There is nothing like receiving an email from a client with an offer to kiss your feet.

But, most of the time you know you are heading into the arena for a bollocking and there is nothing you can do about it, except to practice your poker face and ensure a stiff gin is awaiting you in chambers.

That said, off I go as the next bollocking awaits.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.