Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Merits review ... AAT member's unzipped opinions ... Conservative elbows flailing in all directions ... Unrestrained by convention ... Another KC survey for the Apple Isle Bar ... Push by old buffers to trade in their SCs ... Fascination with gilded embroidery ... Theodora reports ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Back in the ring ... Rape on the minister’s couch … Cover-up … Of course, there was a cover-up … Bettina Arndt and the Institute for the Presumption of Bruce Lehrmann’s Innocence … Linda Reynolds needs sympathy and money … Justice Lee’s loose crumbs ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Plus ça change ... Racism and prejudice ... The police and their cultural predilections ... The ABC and its Lattouf problem ... Reprising Allan Ashbolt and Talbot Duckmanton ... Hard-line interest groups and special pleaders still bashing away at Aunty ... Procrustes files ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


All you need to know about homicide in Australia ... Latest report from the Australian Institute of Criminology ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Celebrations at the Lubyanka ... NSW Supreme Court judges gear up for a big birthday party ... Planned revelries ... Serious reflections ... History by the yards ... Monumental book ... Artworks ... Musicale ... From Miss Ginger Snatch, an associate of judges ... Read more ... 

"A Legal Braveheart who is a defender of the rule of law. Sofronoff had the courage to expose legal misadventure of the sort that must never be condoned. He deserves the nation's gratitude."

Rule of Law Institute plugging a forthcoming lecture by Walter Sofronoff with a quote from an editorial in The Australian. April 19, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Algorithmic injustices ... Criminal justice in the data age ... The lurking dangers when algorithms are used to dispense justice ... Predicting the pattern of potential offenders ... Anthony Kanaan interviews Dr Tatiana Dancy, author of Artificial Justice ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Hoot ... Hoot ... No win, lots of fees – remembering Copper 7 … Conflicts and compromises ... Law and Social Work get cognate at U.Syd … Judge Felicity – feisty telly star … Wendler’s marmalade – by appointment ... From Justinian's Archive, July 30, 2010 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Grant Donaldson SC | Main | Creative possibilities for the law of torts »
Friday
Nov242023

Julian Burnside

A barrister, much of whose career has been in the public eye ... Counsel to the rich and the deprived ... Flirting with politics ... Career change ... Retirement ... Relaxation and writing await ... On The Couch 

Burnside: missed out on engineering

Julian Burnside KC has retired after 47 years as a barrister. For a large part of his career he acted for corporations and the big end of town. 

In 1998 he was counsel for the Maritime Union of Australia in the Patrick Stevedores case and increasingly from the late 90s he did pro bono work for asylum seekers and refugees. 

He has received many awards and garlands for his human rights work. 

And here he is, on Justinian's Couch ...

Describe yourself in three words

Driven, insecure, empathetic

What are you currently reading? 

"Heat: Life and Death on a Scorched Planet" by Jeff Goodell. 

What is your favourite film? 

Recently: "One Life" (Anthony Hopkins) for sentimental reasons

What was your expected career path before you studied law? 

Artist (photography). 

Why did you want to be a barrister?  

I like changing people's minds, although I studied law for accidental reasons. But for the accident that my sister's ex-boyfriend was doing Law at Monash, I might have accepted the Melbourne University offer of a place in their Engineering faculty.

Why are you now leaving the Bar? 

I will be 74 next June.

Who have been the most influential people in your life? 

My wife, Kate Durham and law lecturer Louis Waller (whose son, Ian Waller, was my last reader and was recently appointed a Supreme Court Judge). 

What was your most memorable and/or enjoyable case? 

Trevorrow v South Australia. It is the first case in which a member of the Stolen Generation succeeded and got damages.  

Alan Bond was a lot more entertaining than people gave him credit for. Acting for Rose Porteus was a lot of fun, and so was the Cash for Comment enquiry - cross-examining Alan Jones was clearly more fun for me than for him.  

What was your most miserable/difficult case? 

There isn't one. I enjoyed every case I did. 

What took you into doing significant work for asylum seekers and refugees?  

I learned what we are doing to them when I did the Tampa case. 

What has been your greatest controversy?  

The way we treat human beings looking for a safe place to live.

Are you still a member of the Greens? What attracted you to a political career? 

Yes. The Greens have a policy about Climate Change. I thought that, as a politician, I might be able to inject some decency into the debate in this blessed country.

Who is your greatest friend in the law? 

Matthew Albert. 

What words or phrases do you overuse? 

No ... Not to my taste ... Not mad about.

What is your greatest weakness? 

Impatience, obsessiveness, empathy.

If you were a foodstuff, what would you be? 

A pineapple.

What human quality do you most distrust? 

A stated belief in human rights. 

What would you change about Australia? 

Our attitude to human rights. 

Who or what do you consider overrated? 

Politicians. 

What now for Julian Burnside? 

Relax; write.

What comes into your mind when you shut your eyes and think of the word "law"? 

Rules ... the faint possibility of justice

And here is Burnside in a previous appearance - On The Couch, 2017 

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.