Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Lubyanka ... Bullying investigation into former Federal Court judge goes nowhere ... "Complaint unsubstantiated" ... Phew! ... Recommendations about staff education ... Nothing recommended for judicial induction ... More >> 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"We're in unchartered territory here. A Pope hasn't died before during an Australian election campaign."  

Jane Norman, National Affairs Correspondent, ABC News ... April 21, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« War on wig spitters | Main | Izzo pix taunt plaintiff »
Thursday
Sep082011

Capital capers

News from the bush capital ... ACT Law Society faces unprecedented vigorous three way presidential contest ... Justice Refshauge delivers 30-months reserved damages judgment after nudge from Justinian ... Latest from the Molonglo 

The toy-town law 'n' order society in Canberra has been thrown into conniptions over the 2011 presidential elections. 

Normally the presidency of the ACT Law Society is determined by the meritorious principle of "Muggins turn".

Whomever stays with it longer and turns up to more meetings than anyone else ultimately will crowned, unopposed. 

Barralet: normally it would be her turn at the helmThis system has provided the profession with charismatic leaders, year in, year out. 

Normally it would be the turn this year of the senior vice Kay Barralet. 

The trouble is, for the first time in living memory, there is an election, with three candidates vying for the gilded bauble, which carries an honorarium of around $100,000 a year for three or four days a week of meetings and greetings.  

Kay has been on the council for eight years and normally would be a shoo-in (as many think she should be).  

However, two weeks before the ballot opened Brian Hatch threw his hat in the ring. 

Brian is a former treasurer and vice-prez of the society and, as he says in his election blurb, "I will be able to get started immediately without the need to come to grips with the workings of the society". 

Actually, he has hung out his shingle over the border in Monaro Street Queanbeyan. Apparently, that has something to do with a restraint agreement with a previous law firm that says he can't trade in the ACT. 

Blumer: common law championThe third presidential candidate is Nooraini Blumer from the local PI law shop Blumers. 

You can see her in action, live, on the firm's website

Noor has never been on the law society council, but there is much at stake for the PI industry in the capital territory as proposed legislation is likely to cut a swathe through the common law, which largely still applies in the ACT accident business. 

At present the local Greens have help it up, but vested interests are nervy. 

The election is in full swing and closes on September 15. 

*   *   *

It's heartening to see the power of my relentless cyber press having a positive effect. 

Twenty-eight days after we wrote about the ACT's reserved judgment protocol's failure to produce a result, Justice Refshauge produced a judgment - approximately two-and-a-half years late.   

Multiple notices under the protocol went unanswered by the ACT bar 'n' grill and the Supreme Court.  

Refshauge: sincere regretsEventually there were murmurings that counsel was advising a trip to the High Court with a writ of mandamus. 

Justinian burst into print about the 30-month delay on August 3. 

On August 31 Justice Roughshagger delivered a detailed, and generous, judgment on damages (liability not being an issue) in Leighton v Blundell 

In his final paragraph HH said: 

"I sincerely regret that the busyness of the court has delayed the delivery of judgment and these reasons in this matter. Nevertheless, I have read carefully the entire transcript and the exhibits tendered at the trial as well as my contemporaneous notes. These have resulted in a good recall of the proceedings and of the witnesses giving evidence, notwithstanding the passage of time." 

Where have we read that before

Refshauge published something similar with his reasons in QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd (March 11, 2011): 

"It is extremely regrettable that the busy workload of the court has delayed the delivery of judgment and these reasons for longer than is desirable. Nevertheless, I have carefully read the whole of the transcript and the exhibits that were tendered at the hearing as well as perusing my contemporaneous notes. I found that I had a good recall of the proceedings and the demeanour of Mr Rice as he gave evidence, notwithstanding the passage of time." 

That judgment also dragged the chain by about two-and-a-half years. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.