Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Potty Mouth Solicitor Dispatched ... NSW Court of Appeal takes dim view of solicitor who laced his correspondence with disrespectful insults ... Insufficiently professional ... Arrived from Greece with only his underpants ... No contrition ... Anthony Kanaan files ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Suing for defamation - it's such a good idea ...Federal Court of Australia ... Sydney barrister loses bid for extension of time to bring appeal over decision allowing Giles George to intervene to seek an equitable lien over costs ... Falling out between barrister and firm after successful defamation action ... No error or procedural unfairness ... From Stephen Murray at the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Major victory for the media as public interest defence established in large and lengthy defamation case brought by orthopaedic surgeon ... Al Muderis v Nine Network, Fairfax and The Age ... Good journalism wins the day ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I've stopped six wars in the last - I'm averaging about a war a month. But the last three were very close together. India and Pakistan, and a lot of them. Congo was just and Rwanda was just done, but you probably know I won't go into it very much, because I don't know the final numbers yet. I don't know. Numerous people were killed, and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years, intermittently, and we solved that war. You probably saw it just came out over the wire, so we solved it ..."

President Donald Trump at a meeting in Scotland with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer ... July 28, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Home Duties ... The dumping of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus ... Behind the scenes ... Bastardry among the brothers ... Unfinished business ... Family law, privacy ... Considerable policy and legislative results ... Here's Michelle Rowland as AG ... What are her priors? ... Polly Peck reports from the Gallery ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Abolish silks ... Sydney SC writes to the editor calling for abolition of the silk system ... Appointments are anachronistic ... It's not a matter of ability, only notability ... Secret blackballing ... "Corrupt" process ... Confessions from an insider who played the game ... From Justinian's Archive, October 24, 2002 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The smell of burning silk | Main | The end of the Good Samaritan »
Thursday
Sep152011

Fish without bicycles

Female liberation Chinese style ... PRC Supremes say that if a wife brings nothing to a marriage, she gets nothing on the split-up ... As property prices soar, divorce booms ... Millions of young men with no home and no woman ... Trouble brewing ... Percy Lo-Kit Chan reports 

They may "hold up half the sky", as our late Chairman once remarked, but the recent interpretation of the 1950 Marriage Law by the PRC Supreme Court has occasioned great disquiet.

In effect, the court has ruled that property that a party brings to a marriage will revert to that party on divorce.

Since it is almost a cultural prerequisite that a young male suitor possesses a flat of some sort before making a serious proposal of marriage, the ruling means that a divorced wife (and divorce is becoming increasingly common - last year 2.7 million couples divorced which was an eight percent year-on-year increase over 2009 and seems to have prompted the ruling) will be left without anything. 

Think back to your own position before the wretched decision of your High Court in Mallet v Mallet required a Family Court judge to go through the embarrassing and fruitless exercise of calculating a "pool" of assets brought to the marriage.

This now means a late inheritance, or a lottery win, or some boost to super can have a significant effect on the "pot" available to be claimed by the "lucky" spouse.  

Surely a system where 20 years' hard work meant an automatic 50-50 split would be much simpler and fairer – although not popular with those advising on the high technicality of how to calculate the relevant "pools".

End of the joint assetPrior to the recent ruling by the PRC Supreme Court, the family home had been considered a "joint asset" regardless of who acquired it.

Now, "feudal society is back again" as one irate blogger (and there were more than a million-and-a-half of them on Sina Weibo, the largest micro-blog) has commented.

It was claimed by supporters of the new interpretation that the rule in fact strengthened the traditional family structure by preserving a family's financial investment - for that read, the "husband's family" - whose money may have gone into the acquisition of the newly weds' apartment.

The new ruling must also be seen against the present market position.

First, the price of property has risen some 500 percent since 2000. So, if parents and relatives contribute to help buy the apartment, they will lose out if the marriage founders. 

Secondly, an inability to find the funds to buy an apartment in the first place is leading to a very large and looming social problem.

On present estimates, some 25 to 30 million men will end up as "bare branches" - they will never be able to find a wife because they cannot afford the price of a flat, and more poignantly, because selective feticide which favours a male heir means that the country is many millions of women "short".

Zhou: bare branch crisis loomingYou don't need to be Zhou En-Lai to realize that having 25 million fellas wandering the streets with no home, and no woman, at the age of 24 is going to be a recipe for very big trouble.

If you can, see a recent Chinese movie, Black Mountain, which graphically examines the plight of villagers who have no women and are forced to the unpleasant stratagem of kidnapping young girls and forcing them into a sort of wedlock. 

Of course, the court's ruling is "gender-neutral". If the wife has provided the flat, she will get it back on a split up – as if.

The new ruling, unlike the notional operation of your section 75, ignores all the unpaid work that a wife may provide over many years in running the household.

The position is even worse than the ridiculous UK situation exemplified by Rosset and Stack v Sowden where some sort of notional trust, constructive or resulting (who would know?) is erected by a fiction to provide for the unpaid labour of the female partner.

It is said that the new rules could put women off marriage completely.

The new Marriage Law of 1950 was the first law passed by the Communist government when it seized power in 1949.

It outlawed all sorts of unpleasantness from feudal times - arranged marriages, concubinage, and permitted divorce by a wife for the first time.

Don't forget that it was only the 1938 Act in England that had achieved pretty much the same result as far as divorce was concerned, while the 1882 Married Womens' Property Act had removed part of the problem involved in a woman unfortunately marrying a drunk or a lunatic, or a drunken lunatic, while giving the quietus to a lot of trust learning on settlements of covenants.

Is the new ruling a grossly backward step, or merely the latest incentive to encourage women to become fully emancipated?

To quote one blogger:

"Women, work hard, earn money and buy your own home. After this, a man is as insubstantial as a cloud."

Or as one local female savant put it: "A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicyle." 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.