Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

The law and its miracles ... Party allies selected for judicial elevation in Qld ... Justice Jenni Hill's brother ... More entries for the Golden Tortoise award ... Federal Court muddles the maths, again ... Theodora reports ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


Rupert World ... Lord Moloch’s pal Doug the Diva – driving Washington spare … News UK’s model for unionism … What next for the Washington Post? … Concealed coal lobbyists running an anti-Teal campaign … More corruption busting for Stinging Nettle … The litigation industry spawned by Lehrmann ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Party time for Dicey ... Heydon's book - a pathway to rehabilitation ... The predatory man and the clever intellect - all wrapped up in the one person ... Academic tome and cancel agenda ... Despite the plaudits the record of abuse doesn't vanish ... Book launch with young associates at a safe distance ... Procrustes thinks out loud ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Being a lawyer can be sheer misery ... Psychological distress ... Workplace incivility ... Lack of support ... Rotten culture ... Report on wellbeing ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

Governance turmoil at Tiny Town Law Society ... Night of the long knives ... Lakeside in Canberra ... ACT Law Society upheaval over governance changes ... Bodies carted out of the council room ... Blood on the carpet ... Fraught litigation another distraction ... From Gang Gang ... Read more >> 

"One wonders whether a murderer who later contributes to society might be treated better that Heydon has been." 

Janet Albrechtsen in The Australian seeking the resurrection of former justice Dyson Heydon whose sexual predations ruined the legal careers of young women associates at the High Court ... April 11, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Letter from Rome ... Judges on strike ... Too much "reform" ... Berlusconi legacy ... Referendum on the way ... Constitutional court inflames the Meloni regime with decision on boat people ... Insults galore ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Tea is for Tippy ... Life of a tiffstaff ... Bright, ambitious and, when it comes to the crucial things, hopeless ... Milking the glory of the gig ...  Introducing Tippy, our new blogger filing from within the concrete cage at Queens Square ... From Justinian's Archive, March 15, 2010 ...  Read more >> 


 

 

« Order me a f*&%ing pizza while you're at it | Main | James Hardie and the rule of law brigade »
Wednesday
Jun062012

Putting the Queen back into Queensland 

Long may she reign over us ... Down with SCs ... Queens Counsel make a happy and glorious return to the Queensland Bar … Tory AG and bar hatch exciting plan to turn back the clock … Jubilee celebrations send bar boys troppo 

Ideas Man: Queensland's attorney general Jarrod Bleijie

IN a headlong grope to find a more glorious past, Queens Counsel are on the way back for Queensland barristers. 

The new attorney general, Jarrod Bleijie, 30, who is well to the right of the shop spoon, has sought the bar's response to his innovative suggestion. 

The bar council took about four seconds to embrace the old model for the silkiest of silkies, and in the process made it pretty clear that QCs should never have been done away with in the first place. 

In a circular today (June 6) to the rank and file, chief barman, Roger N. Traves, said that new appointments will have to be by letters patent and only on the recommendation of CJ Daphnis de Jersey.

The existing protocol, whereby the bar puts forward names to the CJ, is to be maintained. 

Excitingly, senior counsel can trade in their nylon gowns for real silk ones and convert to QCs. 

The whole thing is a ludicrous piece of posturing, egged on by the AG. 

Bleijie's other radical initiative since coming to office was to stamp out the Crown solicitors' preferential briefing policy for women barristers, which had been introduced by Labor AG Cameron Dick. 

Traves came up with three compelling reasons for a return to Queens Counsel: 

  • The desirability of having one category of top-notch barrister; 
  • Greater public recognition of the position of QCs; 
  • Desirability of distinguishing QCs from special counsel and senior counsel in solicitors' law shops.

Maybe, there's the possibility that QCs can charge more than SCs. 

Of course, two categories of senior counsel would persist because not everyone would want to embrace the monarchical post nominals - a point that was made by a minority faction at a meeting of the council on June 4. 

It was also argued that the bar should avoid taking a position on what essentially is a cornstalk political gesture.

The only other bars that have retained the flourish are in the boondocks of SA, NT and NZ. 

It seems to be a bit of High Tory policy, because the NZ National Party government announced in 2009 that QCs would make a return to the Land of the Strangled Vowel. 

The Queensland bar's motion in support was hedged with some clumsily worded and puff-ball "conditions": 

MOVED: The President 

SECONDED: Vice-President

1. That the Bar Association of Queensland gives in principle support to the reintroduction of the office of Queen’s Counsel.

2. Recognising that the proposal is in its early stages and that much will depend upon its final form, that the President inform the Honourable the Attorney-General that the Bar Association would regard as critical to any firm proposal:

a. That the integrity of the existing process of appointment is maintained;

b. That the essential features of the present process (save as it may be from time-to- time altered by the Bar Association and the Chief Justice) be maintained, recognising that the ultimate act of appointment will involve some change;

c. Thus, that the existing Protocol (and the Protocol as, from time-to-time, it may by the Bar Association and the Chief Justice be determined to be) for the Appointment of Senior Counsel is recognised as an essential part of the process of appointment of Queen’s Counsel;

d. The process of consultation and recommendation remain within the control of the Bar Association and the Chief Justice;

e. There be appointed to the office of Queen’s Counsel all and only those counsel recommended for appointment as Queen’s Counsel by the Chief Justice;

f. Consistently with recognising the integrity of the existing system, all present Senior Counsel be appointed Queen’s Counsel upon request;

g. The relative seniority of Counsel is maintained; and

h. The Bar Association has a reasonable opportunity to consider any more detailed and the final proposal. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.