Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Tasmanis's Lieutenant Guv (and CJ) Christopher Shenanigans is unlikely to decide the consitiutional impass ... The current guv'nor, former Circuit Court judge and family lawyer Barbara Baker returns to Guv House next week ... Labor hates the Greens and is unlikely to form a coalition government ... Another election looks likely as the numbers for both sides are brittle and unreliable ... However, Baker can ask the Labor leader to test his numbers. 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« The vulture flies to Beijing | Main | Trilby in Misso soup »
Friday
Jun102011

Sinking of the Voyager survivors

Lawyer hollows out Voyager compo awards ... Receiver's costs balloon as Vic Supremes and LSB chew-up victims' proceeds ... Tom Westbrook reports on the latest twists in the David Forster case

HMAS Voyager: loss of 82 livesDavid Forster, the solicitor alleged to have overcharged victims of the Melbourne-Voyager naval disaster, is fighting off receivers and the Bureau de Spank in a protracted struggle that so far has chewed up $1.5 million in costs.

Ultimately, it may be too little too late for many of his ageing former clients.

Forster is presently stalling his way through preliminary attempts by the Legal Services Board to recover missing money - which court documents suggest is as much as $10 million - that would appear to belong to clients for whom he secured compensation.

HMAS Voyager crashed into HMAS Melbourne off Jervis Bay in 1964. Eighty-two sailors died in the accident, which resulted in 214 compensation claims.

David Forster handled 89 of them out of his Frankston law shop, Hollows.

Initially, Forster was cast as a hero, appearing on radio and TV defending his clients' interests, while the government was the villain, dragging its heels on the payouts.

However, as the cases went on – and they did go on, for decades, as the Commonwealth fought tooth and nail – Forster's billing methods began to attract suspicion and the ire of clients.

A complaint by a former employee in 2007 led to an investigation by the Law Institute of Victoria, which in turn led to the Legal Services Board appointing receivers in April last year and refusing to renew Forster's ticket in September.

The receivers, Hall & Wilcox, called in forensic accountants from Deloittes. As a preliminary step Deloittes looked into ten of the 89 Voyager compensation cases that Forster had run.

Only one client out of those ten had received more than 10 percent of the money awarded by the court.

Deloittes said that in nine cases it was likely that Forster had breached the trust account rules.

He had clients sign multiple fee agreements and allegedly double charged them for the same costs, removing money from funds held in trust and again from the final settlement.

There was the old chestnut of charging multiple clients for the same work: Hollows once billed 66 hours in a single day, for a conference with six clients.

HMAS Melbourne: 47 years agoForster described the Deloittes investigation as, "selective ... unfairly ... biased and improper".

The ABC's 7.30 Report ran a story on Forster last November, which featured one of one of his former clients, Barry Spaulding.

Spaulding, who knew nothing of the proceedings against Forster until the 7.30 Peport came knocking, and had no idea that Hollows was in receivership, had been awarded $250,000 in a settlement for post traumatic stress disorder.

He saw only $29,000 of it.

"I thought, 'Well okay, he's ripped me off and, you know, there's nothing I can do about it'," Mr Spaulding told the 7.30 Report.

Another client, Russell Norrish, received $72,000 from a $412,000 settlement.

The receivers have subsequently written to another 49 of Forster's clients and 46 have indicated they would like their dealings with him to be examined.

The LSB and Forster are presently locked in a Victorian Supreme Court battle before Justice Karen Emerton.

On Tuesday (June 7) Forster had a victory of sorts, when Emerton made a preliminary ruling that makes life more difficult for the receivers.

Hollows' receivers had been seeking to subpoena Forster's accountant, John Lombardo, and extract a number of financial documents from Forster and his wife.

They think Forster might have tucked the money away in superannuation.

However, Justice Emerton said that because "the receivers are not at the point where any recovery action is even mooted [it was] premature and unnecessary at this stage" for Forster to hand over the documents or for Lombardo to appear before the court.

The LSB will have to "ascertain by other means" whether Forster holds any ill-gotten assets which could be recovered.

Forster claims to have no assets and his lawyers (he is being represented by a former Hollows' colleague Nelson Pinto) have said that the trusts accounts deficiencies have been "created" by the receivers.

Earlier in the case Justice Emerton rejected Forster's attempts to halt proceedings on the grounds of mental incapacity. She said that the legal arguments could go ahead in his absence.

She has adjourned the matter to June 23 and instructed the parties to attend a case conference on June 16 before Associate Justice Daly.

Forster is also before VCAT (on June 20) fighting the refusal by the LSB to renew his ticket. he says he is entitled to remain a solicitor until the matter before the Supreme Court is settled.

Each day this protracted struggle drags on more and more money that may rightfully belong to Forster's former clients is being chewed-up.

The receiver's costs presently total $937,161.46 and the LSB's in excess of $400,000.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.