Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Unread emails ... Family law barrister in Adelaide neglects to attend to emails ... Reminders to renew her ticket studiously ignored ... Unravelling chaos ... Trials invalidated ... Liability of Law Society and Conduct Commissioner ... Breach of statutory requirement ... Damages ... From our Team on the Torrens ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


An Australian Abroad ... An essay with pictures … Egypt and the Grand Museum … No end to the antiquities … Down the Nile on a dahabiya … Tombs and temples … Paris and industrial-scale tourism … The Yarts & Kulture ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Annihilation of the now ...Trump's campaign of destruction ... Fake emergencies ... Pointless and farcical executive orders ... Gangsterism ... Looting ... Corruption ... Shakedowns ... White rage ... Christian nationalism ... Roger Fitch unloads ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Tasmanis's Lieutenant Guv (and CJ) Christopher Shenanigans is unlikely to decide the consitiutional impass ... The current guv'nor, former Circuit Court judge and family lawyer Barbara Baker returns to Guv House next week ... Labor hates the Greens and is unlikely to form a coalition government ... Another election looks likely as the numbers for both sides are brittle and unreliable ... However, Baker can ask the Labor leader to test his numbers. 

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... Weather report ... Starmer sinking ... Farage rising ... Fake law firm ... Fake cases ...  NHS employee cleans up with woke case for hurt feelings ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"In its self-image, Australia has changed from a nation of tough, resilient Anzacs to a snowflake society of victims. This can be seen in the rise of identity politics, cancel culture, trigger warnings, unconscious bias, workplace Broderickism, LGBTQIA+ pleading, colonisation impacts, hidden disabilities and welfare dependency. Hurt feelings, offensive words, micro-aggressions, workload stress and anxiety now form the basis of workers compensation claims."

Mark Latham MLC - a dissenting statement in a parliamentary report on proposed changes to workers compensation law ... May 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeilgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Justice Jeff Shaw's bingle ... Supreme Court judge's drink-drive experience ... Cars damaged in narrow Sydney street ... Touch driving ... Missing blood sample ... Equality before the law may not apply to judges ... Judges behind the wheel ... From Justinian's Archive ... November 4, 2004 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Hazard to human health | Main | The ambivalence of friendship »
Tuesday
Apr122011

The vulture circles

Vulture fund litigation ... Issue of Hong Kong's jurisdiction over the Congo (Democratic Republic of) ... Expensive counsel fly in from the UK ... Mountains of cash, Chinese politics and judicial independence of Hong Kong all in play ... Percy Lo-Kit Chan reports

It reads like an international thriller - yet the underlying story raises vital issues concerning the rule of law in Hong Kong, and its relations with our "mother country".

In brief, a "vulture" fund (which specialises in buying distressed debt at a deep discount to its face value) acquired an aged and apparently irrecoverable obligation entered by the Democratic Republic of the Congo - think Heart of Darkness meets Hard Times.

The vulture, of course, wishes to collect and discovers an "asset" in the shape of moneys owed to the Congo by a PRC entity, apparently recoverable in Hong Kong.

Can it swoop in upon this juicy piece of carrion and enforce in Hong Kong?

The matter gets interesting and complicated (at least for your correspondent).

The British legal system, which we maintain here as part of our unique comparative advantage over the more byzantine and politically influenced system to our immediate north, recognises a doctrine of "limited sovereign" immunity.

That is to say, according to the Trendtex decision as handed down to us by the common law, if a sovereign entity (like the Congolese government) engages in "trade" and "commercial activity" then those aspects of its business lose the general protection that attaches to its otherwise universal protection as a sovereign state. 

In the usual case, the overriding doctrine of comity would mean that the Hong Kong court would not presume to permit the Congo to be impleaded here in the courts of Hong Kong, nor could China be impleaded in the courts of the Congo. You scratch my back and I will scratch yours!

It seems clear that the activities of the Congo involve "trade" and therefore are not immune. But (and it is very large but) perhaps unsurprisingly, the People's Republic of China does indeed recognise a doctrine of "universal" immunity - that is to say, on no account whatsoever may the Congo be impleaded.

Here lies the rub - the PRC, naturally, is in charge of all our international affairs. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region does not have any "foreign" affairs role at all - that is why, I sleep soundly in my bed every night. I do not worry about someone "attacking" Hong Kong from anywhere because the People's Liberation Army (and navy and airforce) are ever vigilant to ward off incursions.

Surprisingly, although they are no doubt present in some numbers in Hong Kong, one never sees PLA officers, and soldiers, in the streets of Hong Kong, which is a very pleasant contrast to watching brawling members of the Black Watch at Stanley Beach on a Sunday, under the Empire.

So, does the exercise of a jurisdiction over the Congo attract "blanket immunity" - and thus a more than usually hungry vulture - or limited immunity, in which case champagne and caviar at the Mandarin Grill?

The trial judge thought it was a matter for the general PRC law (full immunity), the Court of Appeal disagreed. What will the Final Court of Appeal (on which Mason NPJ will no doubt be playing a leading role) decide?

The matter has a large political element since it is possible for a case to go from the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal to the National People's Congress - a political body and part of the PRC system of governance. 

Naturally, the Court of Final Appeal does not like matters going to the NPC, for the obvious reason that it is not a court of law and hearkens back to the British system under the late Tudors.

In recent memory, only the decision on the "right of permanent abode" for mainland citizens in Hong Kong has gone from the Court of Final Appeal to the NPC where the court's decision was reversed. 

Since this involved important matters of internal migration and a mixture of politico-legal issues, the reference was entirely understandable in one sense.

A caravanserai of great and good counsel (experts in public international law all) flew in, at some expense, from the United Kingdom to argue the case.

What will the court decide? We have a new Chief Justice and an experienced tribunal. The ultimate decision will call for all its combined legal and political savvy to steer a safe course in rocky waters that involve a poultice of cash, the political interests of the Chinese state at the highest level, and the continuing judicial independence of Hong Kong.

Percy

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.