Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Potty Mouth Solicitor Dispatched ... NSW Court of Appeal takes dim view of solicitor who laced his correspondence with disrespectful insults ... Insufficiently professional ... Arrived from Greece with only his underpants ... No contrition ... Anthony Kanaan files ... Read more >>

Politics Media Law Society


The End Of The Affair ... Lord Moloch’s bid for more Fox News fans … The Wall Street Journal rallies the MAGA base …Will the old rogue abandon his journalists? … Is “bawdy” the right word here? … The Deep State plumbs the depths … John and Stanley Roth’s generosity to loving causes ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Suing for defamation - it's such a good idea ...Federal Court of Australia ... Sydney barrister loses bid for extension of time to bring appeal over decision allowing Giles George to intervene to seek an equitable lien over costs ... Falling out between barrister and firm after successful defamation action ... No error or procedural unfairness ... From Stephen Murray at the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Review of the operation of the FCFCA ... No suggestion that the courts should be subsumed by the Federal Court of Australia ... Instead, it's largely not understood that the FCFC consists of two separate courts ... "Unfortunate nicknames" ... Consideration of name change urged, along with further review of the federal law jurisdiction ... On it goes ... Report >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Postcard from London ... Summertime - And the living' is easy ... Votes for 16-year olds ... Paralegal's theft by pen ... Spy helping British intelligence from his job at Border Force ... Super-injunction comes out of the shadows ... Feed them strawberries and cream ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"I've stopped six wars in the last - I'm averaging about a war a month. But the last three were very close together. India and Pakistan, and a lot of them. Congo was just and Rwanda was just done, but you probably know I won't go into it very much, because I don't know the final numbers yet. I don't know. Numerous people were killed, and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years, intermittently, and we solved that war. You probably saw it just came out over the wire, so we solved it ..."

President Donald Trump at a meeting in Scotland with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer ... July 28, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Home Duties ... The dumping of Attorney General Mark Dreyfus ... Behind the scenes ... Bastardry among the brothers ... Unfinished business ... Family law, privacy ... Considerable policy and legislative results ... Here's Michelle Rowland as AG ... What are her priors? ... Polly Peck reports from the Gallery ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Abolish silks ... Sydney SC writes to the editor calling for abolition of the silk system ... Appointments are anachronistic ... It's not a matter of ability, only notability ... Secret blackballing ... "Corrupt" process ... Confessions from an insider who played the game ... From Justinian's Archive, October 24, 2002 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« I'm a loser | Main | A life of crowded hours »
Sunday
Jun232013

Deferred examination application

Law students and their sense of entitlement ... The daily horror of confronting the demands of undeserving yoof ... Dr Criminale teaches at one of our leading halls of learning and is on the front line of the battle 

Dear student,

Thank you for your email with the attached deferred examination application and supporting documents.

I am sorry to hear that your budgerigar appears to have a head cold, that must be quite distressing. For the bird.

I was not previously aware that vets issued medical certificates. I hope that Pee Pee is now well and truly back in rude health.

How was your second cousin's wedding? I'm sure it must have been a terrific celebration, given that you needed six weeks' absence to attend.

Of course, you kept up with your readings while you were overseas, that was obvious from the quality of your mid-session assignment.

I can do no better than quote a couple of the more memorable passages: "parliament illegalised drink spiking a few years ago" and "penile provisions must be strictly constructed".

While you maintain that the mark I gave your paper was harsh it was, in fact, higher than your mark for last session's effort (which was remarkably similar, despite being on a different topic). Moreover, I ignored your failure to provide any references (which I put down to jet-lag).

Perhaps I should take greater account of your vigorous class participation? This included giggling with your mates at the back of the room and asking pertinent questions such as "is this going to be in the exam?".

You were quite right to defend yourself when I told you that constant texting during lectures was not going to help you pass the subject - you were using your phone to take notes, as I now concede.

By the way, what was that song you had for your ringtone? I'd like to get a copy to dance to.

I'm a bit confused about this bit: "you didnt follow the text book."

Gosh you must have a good memory! I never saw the set text in your possession once. I obviously misjudged your devotion to the subject; clearly, you went home every afternoon to compare what I said with what is in the textbook.

As you say, the textbook is too heavy to carry around, and student health and safety is our highest priority here at the university.

As your lecturer I find myself casting my mind forward a bit and imagining you as a legal practitioner (even if you can get admitted following those theft charges you asked me about).

What would this student be like as a lawyer?

I imagine you fronting up before a judge to explain why that order the court made last month has not been complied with.

"Sorry, your Honour, I have been busy with family business." What a good excuse! After all, judges are family people too. I'm sure you would have no trouble in the profession.

If the judge is really nasty you can always use the reasoning in your email: "I tryed really hard and deserve to get thru."

Consequently, there seems to be no reason for concern; in any event, I am glad to say that your admission to the profession will be someone else's responsibility.

Oops! I forgot to mention at the start - I can't deal with this. Deferred examination applications have to go to the student centre, and thence to the subject co-ordinator, who makes the final decision.

See you next session!

Kindest regards,

Dr Criminale

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.